Literature DB >> 23669371

Biomechanical analysis of different types of pedicle screw augmentation: a cadaveric and synthetic bone sample study of instrumented vertebral specimens.

Kuo-Hua Chao1, Yu-Shu Lai, Wen-Chuan Chen, Chia-Ming Chang, Colin J McClean, Chang-Yuan Fan, Chia-Hao Chang, Leou-Chyr Lin, Cheng-Kung Cheng.   

Abstract

This study aims to determine the pull-out strength, stiffness and failure pull-out energy of cement-augmented, cannulated-fenestrated pedicle screws in an osteoporotic cadaveric thoracolumbar model, and to determine, using synthetic bone samples, the extraction torques of screws pre-filled with cement and those with cement injected through perforations. Radiographs and bone mineral density measurements from 32 fresh thoracolumbar vertebrae were used to define specimen quality. Axial pull-out strength of screws was determined through mechanical testing. Mechanical pull-out strength, stiffness and energy-to-failure ratio were recorded for cement-augmented and non-cement-augmented screws. Synthetic bone simulating a human spinal bone with severe osteoporosis was used to measure the maximum extraction torque. The pull-out strength and stiffness-to-failure ratio of cement pre-filled and cement-injected screws were significantly higher than the non-cement-augmented control group. However, the cement pre-filled and cement-injected groups did not differ significantly across these values (p=0.07). The cement pre-filled group had the highest failure pull-out energy, approximately 2.8 times greater than that of the cement-injected (p<0.001), and approximately 11.5 times greater than that of the control groups (p<0.001). In the axial pull-out test, the cement-injected group had a greater maximum extraction torque than the cement pre-filled group, but was statistically insignificant (p=0.17). The initial fixation strength of cannulated screws pre-filled with cement is similar to that of cannulated screws injected with cement through perforations. This comparable strength, along with the heightened pull-out energy and reduced extraction torque, indicates that pedicle screws pre-filled with cement are superior for bone fixation over pedicle screws injected with cement.
Copyright © 2013 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone screw; Dimensions; Insertion; Performance requirements; Pull-out; Static; Test methods; Torsion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23669371     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  12 in total

1.  The contribution of the cortical shell to pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Matthew Henry Pelletier; Nicky Bertollo; Darweesh Al-Khawaja; William Robert Walsh
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

2.  Can cavity-based pedicle screw augmentation decrease screw loosening? A biomechanical in vitro study.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Riesner; Thomas R Blattert; Renate Krezdorn; Simone Schädler; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  ICT technologies as new promising tools for the managing of frailty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alessia Gallucci; Pietro Davide Trimarchi; Carlo Abbate; Cosimo Tuena; Elisa Pedroli; Fabrizia Lattanzio; Marco Stramba-Badiale; Matteo Cesari; Fabrizio Giunco
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 4.  Pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic spine: indications, limitations and technical aspects.

Authors:  S Hoppe; M J B Keel
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  The preoperative Hounsfield unit value at the position of the future screw insertion is a better predictor of screw loosening than other methods.

Authors:  Jingchi Li; Zhuang Zhang; Tianhang Xie; Zhetao Song; Yueming Song; Jiancheng Zeng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 7.034

6.  [Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screw fixation in treatment of senile thoracolumbar tuberculosis combined with severe osteoporosis].

Authors:  Qingda Li; Hao Chen; Tuanjiang Liu; Limin He; Peng Liu; Yuanting Zhao; Jinpeng Du; Peng Zou; Zhengping Zhang; Baorong He; Junsong Yang; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-12-15

7.  In vitro biomechanical study of pedicle screw pull-out strength based on different screw path preparation techniques.

Authors:  Mark Moldavsky; Kanaan Salloum; Brandon Bucklen; Saif Khalil; Jwalant S Mehta
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 8.  Designs and techniques that improve the pullout strength of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: current status.

Authors:  Thomas M Shea; Jake Laun; Sabrina A Gonzalez-Blohm; James J Doulgeris; William E Lee; Kamran Aghayev; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Comparison of bone regeneration in alveolar bone of dogs on mineralized collagen grafts with two composition ratios of nano-hydroxyapatite and collagen.

Authors:  Yan-Fu Wang; Cheng-Yue Wang; Peng Wan; Shao-Gang Wang; Xiu-Mei Wang
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2015-12-31

10.  Hybrid Stabilization of Thoracic Spine Fractures with Sublaminar Bands and Transpedicular Screws: Description of a Surgical Alternative and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Marie-Therese Unterweger; Frank Kandziora; Klaus J Schnake
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2015-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.