| Literature DB >> 26816654 |
Yan-Fu Wang1, Cheng-Yue Wang2, Peng Wan3, Shao-Gang Wang3, Xiu-Mei Wang4.
Abstract
To study the effect of two composition ratios of nano-hydroxyapatite and collagen (NHAC) composites on repairing alveolar bone defect of dogs. Eighteen healthy adult dogs were randomly divided into three groups. Two kinds of the NHAC composites were prepared according to the constituent ratios of 3:7 and 5:5; immediately after extraction of the mandibular second premolars, each kind of the NHAC composite was implanted into extraction socket, respectively: Group I, nHA/Col = 3:7; Group II, nHA/Col = 5:5 and Group III, blank control group. The bone-repairing ability of the two grafts was separately analyzed by morphometric measurement, X-ray tomography examination and biomechanical analysis at 1st, 3rd and 6th month post-surgical, respectively. The NHAC composites were absorbed gradually after implanting into alveolar bone defect and were replaced by new bone. The ratios of new bone formation of Group I was significantly higher than that of Group II after 3 months (P < 0.05). The structure and bioactive performance can be improved when the ratio between the collagen and the hydroxyapatite was reasonable, and the repairing ability and effect in extraction sockets are obviously better.Entities:
Keywords: alveolar ridge preservation; collagen; dental extraction socket; nano-hydroxyapatite; ratios
Year: 2015 PMID: 26816654 PMCID: PMC4723277 DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbv025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regen Biomater ISSN: 2056-3426
The percentage of each component in weight and the parameters of the composites
| Property | NHAC 1 | NHAC 2 |
|---|---|---|
| HA/Col in weight | 3:7 | 5:5 |
| Porosity (%) | 85-95 | 85-95 |
| Diameter of pore (μm) | 50-500 | 50-500 |
Figure 1.Comparison between the two NHAC composites with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectra
Figure 2.Study design for Group I (yellow), Group II (green) and Group III (blue)
Figure 3.The alveolar bone around the extraction socket was cutting into a bone block that the size of it was approximately 25 mm × 15 mm × 10 mm. The black line represents the scan area
Figure 4.The dimensional changes of mandible of each group in different time periods. (A) Result of morphometric measurement among three groups in different time periods. *P < 0.01; **P < 0.01. (B) Result of morphometric measurement in different tine periods among three groups. *P < 0.01
Figure 5.The details of the specimens in the XRM examination at 1, 3 and 6 months. The specimens in different time periods were shown in different colors. (A) The specimen of Group I after 1 month. The area of extraction socket was filled by immature bone. The array of it was messy. (B) The specimen of Group II after 1 month. (C) The specimen of Group III after 1 month. The area of extraction socket was filled mainly by woven bone. (D) The specimen of Group I after 3 months. The newly formed bone had become compact. (E) The specimen of Group II after 3 months. (F) The specimen of Group III after 3 months. The mature bone had become more while the woven bone was still recognized. (G) The specimen of Group I after 6 months. The extraction socket was filled by mature bone. (H) The specimen of Group II after 6 months. (I) The specimen of Group III after 6 months. The woven bone and the mature bone were visible
The trabecular bone volume percentage of each group in different time periods (%)
| Group | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | 14.43 ± 0.77 | 22.22 ± 0.43 | 53.43 ± 0.57 |
| II | 14.27 ± 0.96 | 20.25 ± 0.36 | 50.60 ± 0.82 |
| III | 8.33 ± 0.98 | 17.35 ± 0.55 | 42.75 ± 0.44 |
There was no statistical difference between Group I and Group II (P > 0.05), whereas both of them were greater than Group III (P < 0.01) at 1month. The trabecular bone volume percentage of all groups had increased (P < 0.01). And there was a significant difference among all three groups after 3 months (P < 0.01).
The BP of each group in different time periods (%)
| Group | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | 55.23 ± 0.68 | 23.59 ± 0.83 | 15.22 ± 0.98 |
| II | 55.01 ± 0.73 | 27.61 ± 0.61 | 19.01 ± 0.72 |
| III | 56.27 ± 0.70 | 39.38 ± 0.71 | 26.11 ± 0.77 |
There was no statistical difference among three groups at 1 month (P > 0.05). The BP had decreased during the experimental period (P < 0.01). And there was a significant difference among all three groups after 3 months (P < 0.01).
The ultimate strength of each group in different time periods (MPa)
| Group | No. 1 | No. 2 | No. 3 | No. 4 | Mean | Standard deviation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 25.16 | 25.33 | 24.51 | 25.41 | 25.1025 | 0.41 | 160.5393 | <0.01 |
| II | 30.14 | 29.81 | 31.26 | 30.79 | 30.50 | 0.65 | ||
| III | 23.09 | 22.79 | 23.64 | 21.84 | 22.84 | 0.75 |
Figure 6.The trabecular bone volume percentage of each group in different time periods. (A) The trabecular bone volume percentage among three groups in different time periods. *P < 0.01; **P < 0.01. (B) The trabecular bone volume percentage in different tine periods among three groups. *P < 0.01