Literature DB >> 23669007

Rapid plasticity of motor corticospinal system with robotic reach training.

S S Kantak1, L M Jones-Lush, P Narayanan, T N Judkins, G F Wittenberg.   

Abstract

Goal-directed reaching is important for the activities of daily living. Populations of neurons in the primary motor cortex that project to spinal motor circuits are known to represent the kinematics of reaching movements. We investigated whether repetitive practice of goal-directed reaching movements induces use-dependent plasticity of those kinematic characteristics, in a manner similar to finger movements, as had been shown previously. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to evoke upper extremity movements while the forearm was resting in a robotic cradle. Plasticity was measured by the change in kinematics of these evoked movements following goal-directed reaching practice. Baseline direction of TMS-evoked arm movements was determined for each subject. Subjects then practiced three blocks of 160 goal-directed reaching movements in a direction opposite to the baseline direction (14 cm reach 180° from baseline direction) against a 75-Nm spring field. Changes in TMS-evoked whole arm movements were assessed after each practice block and after 5 min following the end of practice. Direction and the position of the point of peak velocity of TMS-evoked movements were significantly altered following training and at a 5-min interval following training, while amplitude did not show significant changes. This was accompanied by changes in the motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) of the shoulder and elbow agonist muscles that partly explained the change in direction, mainly by increase in agonist MEP, without significant changes in antagonists. These findings demonstrate that the arm representation accessible by motor cortical stimulation under goes rapid plasticity induced by goal-directed robotic reach training in healthy subjects. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AD; BB; EMG; M1; MEPs; MT; PD; TB; TMS; anterior deltoid; biceps brachii; electromyography; motor-evoked potentials; movement time; plasticity; posterior deltoid; primary motor cortex; reaching; robotics; transcranial magnetic stimulation; triceps brachii

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23669007      PMCID: PMC3733539          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  28 in total

1.  Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; L Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of precentral cortex.

Authors:  Michael S A Graziano; Charlotte S R Taylor; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Influence of the amount of use on hand motor cortex representation: effects of immobilization and motor training.

Authors:  S Ngomo; G Leonard; C Mercier
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Neuronal correlates of memory formation in motor cortex after adaptation to force field.

Authors:  Fritzie Arce; Itai Novick; Yael Mandelblat-Cerf; Eilon Vaadia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Cortical preparatory activity: representation of movement or first cog in a dynamical machine?

Authors:  Mark M Churchland; John P Cunningham; Matthew T Kaufman; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Dynamic encoding of movement direction in motor cortical neurons.

Authors:  Jörn Rickert; Alexa Riehle; Ad Aertsen; Stefan Rotter; Martin P Nawrot
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice.

Authors:  J Classen; J Liepert; S P Wise; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996.

Authors:  E M Wassermann
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-01

Review 9.  The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex.

Authors:  A Karni; G Meyer; C Rey-Hipolito; P Jezzard; M M Adams; R Turner; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Pietro Mazzoni
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  8 in total

1.  Self-powered robots to reduce motor slacking during upper-extremity rehabilitation: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  Edward P Washabaugh; Emma Treadway; R Brent Gillespie; C David Remy; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Variance in exposed perturbations impairs retention of visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Cesar Augusto Canaveral; Frédéric Danion; Félix Berrigan; Pierre-Michel Bernier
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Timing of motor cortical stimulation during planar robotic training differentially impacts neuroplasticity in older adults.

Authors:  Crystal L Massie; Shailesh S Kantak; Priya Narayanan; George F Wittenberg
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Relationship between structural brainstem and brain plasticity and lower-limb training in spinal cord injury: a longitudinal pilot study.

Authors:  Michael Villiger; Patrick Grabher; Marie-Claude Hepp-Reymond; Daniel Kiper; Armin Curt; Marc Bolliger; Sabina Hotz-Boendermaker; Spyros Kollias; Kynan Eng; Patrick Freund
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Robot-assisted training of the kinesthetic sense: enhancing proprioception after stroke.

Authors:  Dalia De Santis; Jacopo Zenzeri; Maura Casadio; Lorenzo Masia; Assunta Riva; Pietro Morasso; Valentina Squeri
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Five-day rehabilitation of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty using an end-effector gait robot as a neuromodulation blending tool for deafferentation, weight offloading and stereotyped movement: Interim analysis.

Authors:  Kyo-In Koo; Chang Ho Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Brain activation is related to smoothness of upper limb movements after stroke.

Authors:  Floor E Buma; Joost van Kordelaar; Matthijs Raemaekers; Erwin E H van Wegen; Nick F Ramsey; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Immediate muscle strengthening by an end-effector type gait robot with reduced real-time use of leg muscles: A case series and review of literature.

Authors:  Chang Ho Hwang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 1.337

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.