Literature DB >> 23668907

The 3.2 Å resolution structure of a receptor: CheA:CheW signaling complex defines overlapping binding sites and key residue interactions within bacterial chemosensory arrays.

Xiaoxiao Li1, Aaron D Fleetwood, Camille Bayas, Alexandrine M Bilwes, Davi R Ortega, Joseph J Falke, Igor B Zhulin, Brian R Crane.   

Abstract

Bacterial chemosensory arrays are composed of extended networks of chemoreceptors (also known as methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins, MCPs), the histidine kinase CheA, and the adaptor protein CheW. Models of these arrays have been developed from cryoelectron microscopy, crystal structures of binary and ternary complexes, NMR spectroscopy, mutational, data and biochemical studies. A new 3.2 Å resolution crystal structure of a Thermotoga maritima MCP protein interaction region in complex with the CheA kinase-regulatory module (P4-P5) and adaptor protein CheW provides sufficient detail to define residue contacts at the interfaces formed among the three proteins. As in a previous 4.5 Å resolution structure, CheA-P5 and CheW interact through conserved hydrophobic surfaces at the ends of their β-barrels to form pseudo 6-fold symmetric rings in which the two proteins alternate around the circumference. The interface between P5 subdomain 1 and CheW subdomain 2 was anticipated from previous studies, whereas the related interface between CheW subdomain 1 and P5 subdomain 2 has only been observed in these ring assemblies. The receptor forms an unexpected structure in that the helical hairpin tip of each subunit has "unzipped" into a continuous α-helix; four such helices associate into a bundle, and the tetramers bridge adjacent P5-CheW rings in the lattice through interactions with both P5 and CheW. P5 and CheW each bind a receptor helix with a groove of conserved hydrophobic residues between subdomains 1 and 2. P5 binds the receptor helix N-terminal to the tip region (lower site), whereas CheW binds the same helix with inverted polarity near the bundle end (upper site). Sequence comparisons among different evolutionary classes of chemotaxis proteins show that the binding partners undergo correlated changes at key residue positions that involve the lower site. Such evolutionary analyses argue that both CheW and P5 bind to the receptor tip at overlapping positions. Computational genomics further reveal that two distinct CheW proteins in Thermotogae utilize the analogous recognition motifs to couple different receptor classes to the same CheA kinase. Important residues for function previously identified by mutagenesis, chemical modification and biophysical approaches also map to these same interfaces. Thus, although the native CheW-receptor interaction is not observed in the present crystal structure, the bioinformatics and previous data predict key features of this interface. The companion study of the P5-receptor interface in native arrays (accompanying paper Piasta et al. (2013) Biochemistry, DOI: 10.1021/bi400385c) shows that, despite the non-native receptor fold in the present crystal structure, the local helix-in-groove contacts of the crystallographic P5-receptor interaction are present in native arrays and are essential for receptor regulation of kinase activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23668907      PMCID: PMC3694592          DOI: 10.1021/bi400383e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  100 in total

Review 1.  Transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemoreceptors.

Authors:  J J Falke; G L Hazelbauer
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 13.807

2.  Four-helical-bundle structure of the cytoplasmic domain of a serine chemotaxis receptor.

Authors:  K K Kim; H Yokota; S H Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Covalent modification regulates ligand binding to receptor complexes in the chemosensory system of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  G Li; R M Weis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-02-04       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  XtalView/Xfit--A versatile program for manipulating atomic coordinates and electron density.

Authors:  D E McRee
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  1999 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.867

5.  Attractant regulation of the aspartate receptor-kinase complex: limited cooperative interactions between receptors and effects of the receptor modification state.

Authors:  J A Bornhorst; J J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-08-08       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 6.  Chemotaxis in bacteria.

Authors:  J Adler
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 7.  The superfamily of chemotaxis transducers: from physiology to genomics and back.

Authors:  I B Zhulin
Journal:  Adv Microb Physiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.517

8.  Crystal structure of the CheA histidine phosphotransfer domain that mediates response regulator phosphorylation in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  L Mourey; S Da Re; J D Pédelacq; T Tolstykh; C Faurie; V Guillet; J B Stock; J P Samama
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-05-31       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Determinants of chemotactic signal amplification in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  C Kim; M Jackson; R Lux; S Khan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-03-16       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Motility and chemotaxis in tissue penetration of oral epithelial cell layers by Treponema denticola.

Authors:  R Lux; J N Miller; N H Park; W Shi
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  Signaling and sensory adaptation in Escherichia coli chemoreceptors: 2015 update.

Authors:  John S Parkinson; Gerald L Hazelbauer; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 2.  A tale of two machines: a review of the BLAST meeting, Tucson, AZ, 20-24 January 2013.

Authors:  Christine Josenhans; Kirsten Jung; Christopher V Rao; Alan J Wolfe
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Signalling-dependent interactions between the kinase-coupling protein CheW and chemoreceptors in living cells.

Authors:  Andrea Pedetta; John S Parkinson; Claudia A Studdert
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Baseplate variability of Vibrio cholerae chemoreceptor arrays.

Authors:  Wen Yang; Alejandra Alvarado; Timo Glatter; Simon Ringgaard; Ariane Briegel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins: a core sensing element in prokaryotes and archaea.

Authors:  Abu Iftiaf Md Salah Ud-Din; Anna Roujeinikova
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Assigning chemoreceptors to chemosensory pathways in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Davi R Ortega; Aaron D Fleetwood; Tino Krell; Caroline S Harwood; Grant J Jensen; Igor B Zhulin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The source of high signal cooperativity in bacterial chemosensory arrays.

Authors:  Germán E Piñas; Vered Frank; Ady Vaknin; John S Parkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Chemotaxis arrays in Vibrio species and their intracellular positioning by the ParC/ParP system.

Authors:  Simon Ringgaard; Wen Yang; Alejandra Alvarado; Kathrin Schirner; Ariane Briegel
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Structure, function, and on-off switching of a core unit contact between CheA kinase and CheW adaptor protein in the bacterial chemosensory array: A disulfide mapping and mutagenesis study.

Authors:  Andrew M Natale; Jane L Duplantis; Kene N Piasta; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Chemotaxis cluster 1 proteins form cytoplasmic arrays in Vibrio cholerae and are stabilized by a double signaling domain receptor DosM.

Authors:  Ariane Briegel; Davi R Ortega; Petra Mann; Andreas Kjær; Simon Ringgaard; Grant J Jensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.