Literature DB >> 23667758

Three-dimension High-resolution Anorectal Manometry Can Precisely Measure Perineal Descent.

Véronique Vitton1, Jean-Charles Grimaud, Michel Bouvier.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23667758      PMCID: PMC3644663          DOI: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.2.257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 2093-0879            Impact factor:   4.924


× No keyword cloud information.
A 65-year-old woman was referred to investigate a long history of intractable constipation. Clinical examination revealed a descending perineum and digital examination diagnosed a large rectocele without stool in the rectum. The patient underwent 3-dimension high-resolution anorectal manometry (3DHRAM), dynamic endo-anal ultrasonography (D-EUS) and conventional defecography. The 3DHRAM showed mean resting pressure of 84 mmHg, mean maximal squeezing pressure of 207 mmHg and length of the high-pressure zone of 2.7 mm. The recto-anal inhibitory reflex was present and the rectal sensitivity was normal (10 mL). However there was an incomplete anal relaxation during attempted defecation indicating a pelvic floor dyssynergia. In addition during attempted defecation a 9 mm perineal descent on the manometric probe was observed in the left lateral decubitus position (Figure). At the end of the bear down the perineum regained its initial position indicating that the probe has not moved. Conventional defecography showed a 9.2 mm perineal descent from the pubo-coccygeal line, a retentive rectocele of 69 mm and rectal intussusception. D-EUS showed no anal sphincter defect and, at dynamic time, showed a rectocele measured at 35 mm and descending perineum measured at 15 mm according to the method described by Vitton et al.1
Figure

Result of the 3-dimension high-resolution anorectal manometry during the defecation effort. Before (A), during (B) and after (C) defecation effort. The row between the 2 dotted lines measures the size of the perineal descent. Note that in C the perineum regain its initial position (as in A).

This observation confirms that 3DHRAM can provide morphological data as reported by previous data.2-5 Here, for the first time, 3DHRAM demonstrated to diagnose precisely a perineal descent which was also diagnosed by conventional defecography suggesting that the position of the patient during the procedure might not be such an important determinant of pelvic floor disorder measurement.
  5 in total

1.  Investigation of anal motor characteristics of the sensorimotor response (SMR) using 3-D anorectal pressure topography.

Authors:  Gregory Cheeney; Jose M Remes-Troche; Ashok Attaluri; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 4.052

2.  Topographic and manometric characterization of the recto-anal inhibitory reflex.

Authors:  G Cheeney; M Nguyen; J Valestin; S S C Rao
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Dynamic anal endosonography and MRI defecography in diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: comparison with conventional defecography.

Authors:  Véronique Vitton; Pascal Vignally; Marc Barthet; Valérie Cohen; Olivier Durieux; Michel Bouvier; Jean-Charles Grimaud
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  High-resolution Anorectal Manometry for Acquired Megarectum in a Patient With Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Tae Hee Lee; Joon Seong Lee
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 4.924

5.  High-resolution Anorectal Manometry and Anal Endosonographic Findings in the Evaluation of Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Tae Hee Lee; Joon Seong Lee
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.924

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional Anorectal Manometry Enhances Diagnostic Gain by Detecting Sphincter Defects and Puborectalis Pressure.

Authors:  Shreya Raja; Francis C Okeke; Ellen M Stein; Sameer Dhalla; Monica Nandwani; Kristle L Lynch; C Prakash Gyawali; John O Clarke
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry in functional anorectal disorders: results from a large observational cohort study.

Authors:  Charlotte Andrianjafy; Laure Luciano; Camille Bazin; Karine Baumstarck; Michel Bouvier; Véronique Vitton
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  How to Perform and Interpret a High-resolution Anorectal Manometry Test.

Authors:  Tae Hee Lee; Adil E Bharucha
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-01-31       Impact factor: 4.924

Review 4.  The London Classification: Improving Characterization and Classification of Anorectal Function with Anorectal Manometry.

Authors:  S Mark Scott; Emma V Carrington
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2020-09-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.