Literature DB >> 23106008

High-resolution Anorectal Manometry and Anal Endosonographic Findings in the Evaluation of Fecal Incontinence.

Tae Hee Lee1, Joon Seong Lee.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23106008      PMCID: PMC3479261          DOI: 10.5056/jnm.2012.18.4.450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 2093-0879            Impact factor:   4.924


× No keyword cloud information.
A 65-yeduring the past 2 years. She usually was not aware of it although sometimes she was not able to hold back stool until going to the bathroom in time. The stools were usually soft and formed. She denied neurologic symptoms, urinary incontinence and pelvic or perianal injury. She had 2 children by natural childbirth. She has taken nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug for osteoarthritis. Perianal examination showed unremarkable findings. Digital rectal examination revealed weak resting tone and normal increase with squeeze. However, digital rectal examination is not reliable and is subject to interobserver differences due to several factors including the size of the examiner's finger, the technique and the cooperation of patient.1 Thereforear-old woman presented with moderate volume of fecal incontinence high-resolution anorectal manometry (ManoScan, Sierra Scientific Instruments, Los Angeles, CA, USA) and anal endosonography were performed. The high-resolution anorectal manometry showed a very low mean resting anal pressure, relatively intact maximal squeezing pressure and short duration of the sustained squeezing pressure. However abrupt increase of anal sphincter pressure above rectal pressure that could prevent stress incontinence was observed during cough (Fig. 1). Because resting anal pressure predominantly represents the internal anal sphincter (IAS) pressure and the squeezing pressure predominantly measures the external anal sphincter pressure, these findings imply defect in IAS with normal external anal sphincter.2 The anal endosonography also revealed the presence of scarring of IAS from the 8 to 1-o'clock direction (Fig. 2). In this patient, fecal incontinence was turned out to be caused by the IAS defect.
Figure 1

The low mean resting anal pressure (28 mmHg), maximum squeezing pressure (135 mmHg) and short duration of sustained squeezing pressure (5 second) are observed. During coughing, abrupt increase of anal sphincter pressure is noted.

Figure 2

Anal endosonography shows the presence of scarring of internal anal sphincter from the 8 to 1-o'clock direction.

  2 in total

1.  Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Investigation and treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  S Maslekar; A Gardiner; C Maklin; G S Duthie
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.401

  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry in functional anorectal disorders: results from a large observational cohort study.

Authors:  Charlotte Andrianjafy; Laure Luciano; Camille Bazin; Karine Baumstarck; Michel Bouvier; Véronique Vitton
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Three-dimension High-resolution Anorectal Manometry Can Precisely Measure Perineal Descent.

Authors:  Véronique Vitton; Jean-Charles Grimaud; Michel Bouvier
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.924

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.