The tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) is a multifunctional cytokine playing a key role in tissue regeneration and remodeling. Dysregulation of TWEAK signaling is involved in various pathological processes like autoimmune diseases and cancer. The unique interaction with its cognate receptor Fn14 makes both ligand and receptor promising targets for novel therapeutics. To gain insights into this important signaling pathway, we determined the structure of soluble human TWEAK in complex with the Fab fragment of an antibody selected for inhibition of receptor binding. In the crystallized complex TWEAK is bound by three Fab fragments of the neutralizing antibody. Homology modeling shows that Fab binding overlaps with the putative Fn14 binding site of TWEAK. Docking of the Fn14 cysteine rich domain (CRD) to that site generates a highly complementary interface with perfectly opposing charged and hydrophobic residues. Taken together the presented structure provides new insights into the biology of TWEAK and the TWEAK/Fn14 pathway, which will help to optimize the therapeutic strategy for treatment of related cancer types and autoimmune diseases.
The tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) is a multifunctional cytokine playing a key role in tissue regeneration and remodeling. Dysregulation of TWEAK signaling is involved in various pathological processes like autoimmune diseases and cancer. The unique interaction with its cognate receptor Fn14 makes both ligand and receptor promising targets for novel therapeutics. To gain insights into this important signaling pathway, we determined the structure of soluble humanTWEAK in complex with the Fab fragment of an antibody selected for inhibition of receptor binding. In the crystallized complex TWEAK is bound by three Fab fragments of the neutralizing antibody. Homology modeling shows that Fab binding overlaps with the putative Fn14 binding site of TWEAK. Docking of the Fn14cysteine rich domain (CRD) to that site generates a highly complementary interface with perfectly opposing charged and hydrophobic residues. Taken together the presented structure provides new insights into the biology of TWEAK and the TWEAK/Fn14 pathway, which will help to optimize the therapeutic strategy for treatment of related cancer types and autoimmune diseases.
The TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK, TNSF12, APO3L, CD255) is a member of the TNF superfamily of cytokines. TWEAK was first described in 1997 as a novel TNF-like protein displaying pro-apoptotic activity on interferon γ treated humanHT-29colon carcinoma cells [1] and since then has emerged as a prominent player in normal and pathological tissue remodeling. It is expressed as a 249 amino acid long type II membrane bound protein and comprises an intracellular N-terminal domain, which contains a potential protein kinase C phosphorylation site, a transmembrane domain and an extracellular TNF homology domain (THD). Upon specific proteolysis by the serine protease furin, soluble TWEAK is released from membranes [1]–[3].Both membrane bound and soluble forms of TWEAK have been shown to be able to bind to the TWEAK receptor and trigger signaling [2]. The cognate TWEAK receptor (Fn14, TWEAKR, TNFRSF12A, CD266) is the smallest member of the TNF receptor superfamily (TNFRS) so far and interacts only with TWEAK [4]. The extracellular TWEAK binding domain of Fn14 comprises a single cysteine rich domain (CRD) that contains 3 disulfide bonds. It is structurally related to the CRD of other TNFRS members, some of which have been structurally characterized [5].Signaling of Fn14 is initiated when TWEAK binds to the receptor and induces its trimerization. The signal is transmitted into the cell by attraction of the TNFR-associated factors (TRAFs) 1, 2, 3 and 5 to the short C-terminal cytoplasmic tail of Fn14 [6], [7]. This interaction leads to the activation of several signaling pathways including the ERK [8]–[10] and JNK [8], [11] pathways as well as the non-canonical [12]–[14] and canonical NF-κB signaling cascade [6], [7], [13]–[16]. The activation of the pathways results in the induction or repression of target gene expression.Since its discovery, the TWEAK-Fn14 cytokine-receptor system has emerged from a weakly apoptosis-inducing signal to a key-player in the regulation of various, sometimes even opposing, cellular processes in tissue remodeling. Presence of TWEAK was shown in vitro to stimulate or inhibit proliferation, initiate or prohibit differentiation, support migration, prolong survival or induce cell death [1], [17]–[22]. Additionally, Maecker and colleagues revealed that TWEAK serves as a regulator of the innate immune system and its interplay with adaptive immunity. [23] The biological relevance of TWEAK is potentiated by the fact that in contrast to other TNF superfamily members TWEAK is a widely expressed cytokine in many different tissue and tumor specimens (for references see [24]). Its receptor Fn14 is expressed in all cell types analyzed so far, except primary B and T cells. In contrast to other TNFRS members, Fn14 expression is up-regulated by a wide range of cytokines, growth factors and Fn14 self-activation [8], [25], [26]. The large repertoire of cellular responses together with the broad range of cell types expressing TWEAK and Fn14 makes them key regulators of progenitor expansion, cell proliferation, cell migration, angiogenesis and inflammation during tissue repair after acute injuries and in physiological tissue remodeling [4], [8], [27]–[34].All these processes have to be tightly regulated and any dissonance in this orchestra easily leads to pathological effects. Consequently, the TWEAK-Fn14 axis was shown to play a detrimental role in several diseases. The ambivalent nature of TWEAK signaling is reflected in its effects on tumors. On the one hand, TWEAK is indeed able to induce apoptosis in tumor cells [35]. On the other hand, Fn14 expression is up-regulated in many tumor cell lines and tumors promoting proliferation, angiogenesis, inflammation, cell invasion and metastasis [15], [17], [18], [26], [29], [36]–[41]. Imbalance in the regulation of TWEAK in the process of inflammation and immune modulation leads to the development of chronic inflammation and autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis [20], [42], systemic lupus erythematosus [43], [44], neuroinflammation [16], [45], multiple sclerosis [46], [47] and ischaemic stroke [48]–[51]. The involvement of the TWEAK-Fn14 axis in beneficial as well as hazardous processes, make both ligand and receptor potential targets for novel therapeutics.Possible new therapeutic approaches based on monoclonal antibodies or antibody derivates can either directly block the TWEAKFn14 interaction or kill the cells by targeting Fn14 with antibodies inducing Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), delivering toxins or triggering the intrinsic apoptotic potential of Fn14. However, no structural information of this important cytokine or its interaction with Fn14 is available, perhaps because TWEAK is a very sticky and difficult to handle protein and not well suited for forming highly ordered crystals. In addition, a complex of TWEAK with a potentially therapeutic antibody could help develop treatments aimed at neutralizing the activity of TWEAK in soluble form or in its membrane bound form. In this study we report the crystal structure of TWEAK in complex with a Fab derived from a humanized neutralizing anti-TWEAKrabbit antibody. We derive a molecular framework for TWEAK, differences and similarities to other TNF family cytokines and, by comparison with available structures of TNF superfamily members in complex with their receptors, our structure enables us to dock the Fn14CRD to its putative binding site on the ligand TWEAK. In addition, the structure of humanTWEAK suggests that binding to HSPGs is important for triggering signaling after acute injuries and supports tumor development as it is observed for other cytokines.
Materials and Methods
Half-Life Determination of the TWEAK-antibody Complex
A Biacore 2000 instrument was used with a Biacore SA and HBS-ET (10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.05% Tween® 20). Biotinylated human soluble TWEAK was coupled to the chip at 150 RU. Antibodies (100 mM in HBS-ET) were injected at 100 nM with a flowrate of 100 µl/min for 2 min association time. The dissociation of the immune complex was monitored for 5 min at 25°C in HBS-ET. The kinetically rate limiting step of the complex dissociation phase in the interval [240 s–300 s] was taken to calculate the dissociation rate kd [1/s] (Biacore Evaluation Software 4.0). According to the equation t1/2 diss = ln(2)/(60×kd), the half-life of the immune complex in minutes was calculated.
Crossblocking Experiment
A Biacore 3000 instrument was used at 25°C with a Biacore SA sensor and HBS-ET as system buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.05% Tween® 20). The sensor was treated with EDC/NHS chemistry (Biacore) and blocked with ethanolamine to suppress unspecific binding. Finally, the sensor was conditioned with 3×1 min 1 M NaCl/50 mM NaOH and 1×1 min 10 mM HCl at 100 µl/min. The biotinylated TWEAK ligand was injected at 5 nM in HBS-ET at a flow rate of 30 µl/min over all flow cells. Subsequently the respective primary antibody was injected in a single flow cell at 10 µl/min for 4 min. The secondary antibody was injected over all flow cells with the same conditions as the primary antibody. The binding level of the primary and secondary antibody was monitored and the Molar Ratio (MR) was calculated as the quotient from the signal level of secondary antibody/primary antibody. The sensor was inactivated by a 1 min injection at 30 µl/min of 6 M guanidinium hydrochloride in 100 mM glycine buffer pH 1.5. The TWEAK ligand was inactivated. The baseline was stabilized by a 7 min injection of HBS-ET at 100 µl/min. Within 7 cycles, new biotinylated TWEAK ligand was captured in the flow cells at 294 RU +/−5 RU. As a control, 100 nM polyclonal sheep antibody (Roche) was injected instead of primary and secondary antibody.
Neutralization of TWEAK-Fn14 Interaction
Blocking of TWEAK-Fn14 interaction was shown by receptor interaction ELISA. 96-well Maxisorp® plates (Nunc, Langenselbold, Germany) were coated with 100 µl 1 µg/ml humanFn14:Fc (extracellular domain of humanFn14 (amino acids 1–75) fused to Fc portion of human IgG1) in PBS per well for 1.5 h at room temperature and blocked with a solution of 5% FBS in PBS for 30 minutes at room temperature under shaking. In the meantime, human Flag-tagged soluble TWEAK (amino acids 106–249; 2.5 ng/ml in blocking solution) was incubated with different concentrations of anti-TWEAK antibody or hybridoma supernatant for 2 h at room temperature under shaking. After washing the Fn14-coated plate once with buffer (0.1% Tween® 20 in PBS), 100 µl of the TWEAK-antibody solution were transferred to each well and the plate was incubated for 1 h at room temperature, followed by four washes with wash buffer. Wells were filled with 100 µl of anti-FLAG-HRP detection antibody, diluted 1∶5000 in blocking buffer, and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After four more wash steps, the signal was developed by addition of 100 µl 3,3,5,5-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) solution for approximately ten minutes. The reaction was stopped by adding 100 µl of 1 N 10 HCl, and absorbance measured at 450 nm (reference wavelength 620 nm).
IL-8 Secretion ELISA
Blocking of TWEAK activity by the anti-TWEAK antibody in a cellular system was shown in an IL-8 secretion assay using A375melanoma cells. 10,000 A375 cells (ATCC #CRL1619) were seeded per well of 96-well cell culture plate in 100 µl of growth medium (DMEM with 4.5 g/L glucose, with pyruvate and GlutaMAX™/10% FBS) and incubated at 37°C/5% CO2 for 48 h. Human recombinant soluble TWEAK was pre-incubated at 300 ng/ml with different concentrations of anti-TWEAK antibodies in growth medium for 30 minutes at room temperature. Then, 50 µl of the mixture were added to each well of the cell plate, followed by another 48 h-incubation to allow for IL-8 secretion. 20 µl of the cell supernatant were removed after centrifuging the plate for five minutes at 200×g and mixed with 980 µl of RD5P Calibrator Diluent from the “CXCL8 Quantikine ELISA” kit (R&D Systems). IL-8 was detected by the ELISA according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Protein Production and Crystallization
Chimeric rabbit anti-TWEAK monoclonal antibody was produced by standard procedures. A Fab fragment was prepared by papain digestion for 3 h. The Fc portion was removed using a HiTrap MabSelect Xtra column (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany) and the Fab fragment purified by gelfiltration on a Sephadex 75 column (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany) with 20 mM His-HCl, 140 mM NaCl, pH 6.0 as buffer. For complex formation of the Fab with humanTWEAK, the Fab solution was used to directly dissolve freeze-dried recombinant humanTWEAK (PeproTech GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) to a final molar ratio of 1∶1. To remove residual phosphate from the TWEAK preparation, the complex was desalted with 5 ml HiTrap Desalting columns (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany) and 20 mM His-HCl, 140 mM NaCl, pH 6.0 as buffer. For crystallization, 1 µl protein solution (18 mg/ml) was mixed with 1 µl reservoir solution 30% w/v Ethanol/10% w/v PEG6000/100 mM Sodium Acetate. Crystals grew at 25°C using the hanging drop vapor diffusion method. Prior to flash freezing in liquid nitrogen, crystals were cryoprotected by adding 1 µl reservoir supplemented with 20% (v/v) 1,4-butanediol to the drop.
Data Collection, Molecular Replacement and Structure Refinement
Diffraction Data were recorded at 100 K at the beamline X06SA (SLS/Switzerland) and processed with XDS [52] (Table 1). Initial phases were obtained by molecular replacement with PHASER [53] using the previously solved structure of a therapeutic antibody Fab fragment in complex with humanTWEAK as search models (to be published). In total, one complex consisting of one Fab fragment and one TWEAK molecule could be positioned in the asymmetric unit. The complete biological relevant complex of a TWEAK trimer bound by three Fab fragments can be generated by applying three fold symmetry along the crystallographic axis. Initial models were completed and refined by iterative cycles of manual model building including water placement with COOT [54] and standard crystallographic refinement including positional refinement, bulk solvent correction, overall anisotropic B factor and TLS refinement with Phenix [55]. In the final refinement round of a twinned refinement with Phenix [56] using the twin law -k,-h,-l has been applied. Refinement and model statistics are shown in Table 2. Buried surfaces were calculated with AreaIMol [57]. Rigid body and positional refinement of the putative TWEAK-Fn14 complex was performed with CNS [58]. Structure figures were generated with PyMOL (www.pymol.org).
Table 1
Crystallographic data collection and model refinement statistics.
Data collection
Beamline
X06SA (SLS)
Wavelength
0.933
Space group Unit Cell parameters
P3
a, b, c (Å)
101.64 101.64 57.59
α, β, γ (°)
90 90 120
Resolution (Å) (last shell)
30.0–2.5 (2.65–2.50)
Observed reflections (last shell)
84796 (13268)
Completeness (last shell)
99.5 (97.8)
Redundancy (last shell)
3.7 (3.7)
Rsym (last shell)
9.8 (15.8)
I/σ (last shell)
3.7 (3.7)
Refinement
Resolution (Å)
30–2.5
No. reflections (test)
22932 (2294)
Rwork/Rfree
18.34/21.11
No. atoms
Protein
4273
Water
100
rmsd from ideal
Bond lengths (Å)
0.013
Bond angles (°)
1.625
Ramachandran plot
Most favoured (%)
95.8
Additionally allowed (%)
4.02
Disallowed (%)
0.18
PDB Accession Code
4HT1
Table 2
Cross blocking assay.
Molar Ratio1 (%)
Antibody 2
Antibody 1
chi TW-301
chi TW-304
chi TW-305
chi TW-301
0
6
9
chi TW-304
0
0
3
chi TW-305
0
1
0
The Molar Ratio (MR %) was calculated as the quotient of the secondary antibody binding signal to the primary antibody binding signal, both binding to the surface-presented TWEAK ligand.
The Molar Ratio (MR %) was calculated as the quotient of the secondary antibody binding signal to the primary antibody binding signal, both binding to the surface-presented TWEAK ligand.
Results
Structure Determination of the TWEAK-Fab Complex
Anti-humanTWEAK antibodies were obtained by immunization of New Zealand white rabbits and selected for their ability to bind humanTWEAK, neutralize TWEAK-Fn14 interaction and inhibit TWEAK-induced IL-8 secretion in A375melanoma cells. From all binders, three showed inhibition of the TWEAK-Fn14 interaction with IC50 in the low nM range resulting in the reduction of IL-8 secretion with an IC50 around 700 nM (Table 3).
Table 3
Biochemical analysis of selected anti TWEAK antibodies.
Inhibition of TWEAK-FN14 interaction
Half-life of immunocomplex
Inhibition of IL-8 secretion
IC50 [ng/ml]
t/2 diss [min]
IC50 [ng/ml]
TW-301
3.4
n.d.
128
TW-304
2.8
n.d.
109
TW-305
2.5
n.d.
99
chi TW-301
2.8
110
121
chi TW-304
2.6
37
122
chi TW-305
2.6
147
104
To test whether the selected antibodies bind different epitopes we performed crossblocking experiments using surface plasmon resonance. The accessibility values of all tested antibodies are below 10%, which is in the noise of the assay. These data indicate that the tested antibodies bind to overlapping epitope regions (Table 2). For crystallization, the antibody forming the immune complex with the slowest koff was chosen (TW305chi in Table 3). From this antibody, Fab fragments were produced and used for crystallization of a complex between humanTWEAK and the Fab fragments.The complex of soluble humanTWEAK with the Fab fragment was reconstituted by directly dissolving lyophilized recombinant soluble humanTWEAK in the buffer containing the Fab. In contrast to TWEAK alone, the reconstituted complex can easily be desalted without the reported problems of protein sticking to size exclusion matrices under low salt conditions [1]. The structure of the complex was solved by molecular replacement with a limiting resolution of 2.5 Å and refined to an R-factor of 23.8% (Rfree = 28.4%). Examples of initial 2mFo-DFc electron density after replacement and final 2mFo-DFc density after coordinate refinement are shown in Figures 1C and D respectively. Complete crystallographic statistics are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 1
Overall structure of the TWEAK - Fab complex.
A) Ribbon model of human TWEAK (orange) complexed with the Fab fragment of a therapeutic antibody (light chain in blue and heavy chain in green). The symmetry related two TWEAK – Fab complexes forming the physiological trimeric TWEAK are colored in gray with the corresponding 3-fold crystallographic axis depicted as a black triangle. The complex resembles a three-bladed propeller with each TWEAK-Fab protomer being one blade. B) Side view of the complex with same colors as in A. The Fab fragments are not binding planar but tilted ∼ 45° out of the plane to TWEAK leading to a trihedral shaped complex. C) Initial 2FoFc electron density after replacement as blue mesh around the disulfide bond of human TWEAK contoured at 1σ (amino acids as color coded sticks). D) Final 2FoFc electron density after refinement as blue mesh around the disulfide bond of human TWEAK contoured at 1σ (amino acids as color coded sticks).
Overall structure of the TWEAK - Fab complex.
A) Ribbon model of humanTWEAK (orange) complexed with the Fab fragment of a therapeutic antibody (light chain in blue and heavy chain in green). The symmetry related two TWEAK – Fab complexes forming the physiological trimeric TWEAK are colored in gray with the corresponding 3-fold crystallographic axis depicted as a black triangle. The complex resembles a three-bladed propeller with each TWEAK-Fab protomer being one blade. B) Side view of the complex with same colors as in A. The Fab fragments are not binding planar but tilted ∼ 45° out of the plane to TWEAK leading to a trihedral shaped complex. C) Initial 2FoFc electron density after replacement as blue mesh around the disulfide bond of humanTWEAK contoured at 1σ (amino acids as color coded sticks). D) Final 2FoFc electron density after refinement as blue mesh around the disulfide bond of humanTWEAK contoured at 1σ (amino acids as color coded sticks).In total, one TWEAK molecule and one Fab fragment could be positioned in the asymmetric unit. Like other members of the TNF superfamily, soluble TWEAK is a homotrimer. This biological relevant trimer is found in the crystal and can be generated by applying the symmetry operation of the 3-fold crystallographic axis that coincides with the intrinsic 3-fold axis of the TWEAK trimer (Fig. 1A). The immune complex consists of one TWEAK homotrimer with three bound Fab fragments. When viewed along the 3-fold axis the hexameric complex has an overall shape that resembles a three-bladed propeller with each TWEAK-Fab protomer being one blade (Fig. 1A).The pseudo 2-fold axis of the Fab fragments relating the heavy and light chains is not perpendicular to the 3-fold axis but the Fab fragments are tilted ∼ 45° out of the plane (Fig. 1B). The 3-dimensional arrangement of the hexameric complex resembles therefore a trigonal pyramid with the TWEAK trimer at the apex and the three Fab fragments pointing towards the 3 corners of the trigonal base (Fig. 1B). In this binding orientation the antibody would point away from the membrane in the situation of the membrane bound TWEAK precursor, with the membrane located above the TWEAK molecule in Figure 1B. Thereby the antibody not only binds soluble TWEAK, but in principle might be able to bind to TWEAK before it is released from its membrane bound precursor. On the one hand, the antibody can neutralize soluble TWEAK molecules. On the other hand, the antibody might be able to inhibit direct signaling of membrane bound TWEAK.
Details of the TWEAK-Fab Interface
The Fab binds to a non-linear epitope on humanTWEAK. The recognition of the epitope is mainly achieved by the hypervariable region of the heavy chain. Notable hydrogen bonds involved in the binding are YH33–GT185 (3.4 Å) of CDR H1, QH55 - DT184 (3.1 Å) and RH54 - ET152 (3.3 Å) of CDR H2 and YH101–IT150 (3.2 Å), YH103–GT185 (2.7 Å), DH104–RT227 (2.8 Å) of CDR H3. From the light chain, a hydrogen bond is formed between YL93 of CDR L3 and LT187 (2.7 Å) (Fig. 2C). In addition to the hydrogen bonds, a central π stacking interaction between YH101 and RT225 supports the specificity towards the epitope (Fig. 2C). The residues of TWEAK forming the antigenic epitope are located in the loops connecting strands D/E and B’/B and residues of strand G (for numbering see Fig. 3C). The interaction of the Fab fragment with TWEAK buries in total an area of 882 Å2, which is in the typical range of the interaction surface between antibodies and protein antigens [59]. Besides this main antigen-antibody recognition, an additional interaction between residues RL68 located in a loop on one of the six canonical CDR loops and DT265 of a second TWEAK molecule of the TWEAK trimer is formed (Fig. 2C). However, both residues are located outside the core epitope and are solvent exposed. As a result of that exceptional position, the arginine can be mutated in the process of humanization to glycine without loss of affinity.
Figure 2
Interaction of the antibody with TWEAK.
A) Ribbon representation of one Fab fragment binding to one TWEAK protomer (orange:TWEAK, blue:light chain, green:heavy chain). B) Stereo representation of the epitope recognition with interacting residues as labeled stick model and important hydrogen bond interaction highlighted as dashed lines. The binding is mainly mediated by CDR loop 1 and 2 of the heavy chain interacting with residues of the loops connecting strands D/E and B’/B and residues of strand G. In addition Y93 of CDR3 of the light chain interacts with a main chain N and stacks with the guanidinium group of R130 of TWEAK. C) Interestingly not only canonical CDR loops are involved in TWEAK binding, but an additional hydrogen bond is formed between light chain R68 of a non CDR loop with D75 of a second subunit of the trimeric TWEAK complex (gray).
Figure 3
Structure of human TWEAK.
A) Ribbon representations of the TWEAK trimer with one protomer colored orange and the symmetry related ones in gray (crystallographic 3-fold axis indicated as black triangle). On the left top view oriented as in 1A with N- and C-Terminus on the top. In the middle side view oriented as in 1B with labeled N- and C-Terminus. In the situation of the uncleaved precursor the membrane is located on top of the molecule. The disulfide bond is highlighted as stick model and beta strands are labeled according to TNF superfamily nomenclature. The dashed lines indicate flexible loops E-F and A-A’’ not visible in the electron density. On the right, bottom view of the TWEAK trimer. B) Solvent accessible electrostatic surface potential (red −4 kT to blue +4 kT) of the TWEAK trimer with the same orientations as in A. Resembling the high pI of TWEAK with 9.62 the complete upper surface is highly positively charged. A second basic patch is located at the side of the TWEAK trimer (dashed ellipse middle picture). This positively charged region is also found in other members of the TNF family (i.e. APRIL, BAFF) and coincides with their receptor binding site. C) Overview of the TWEAK-TWEAK interface as found in the homotrimer in the same orientation and labeled as in A (middle picture). Notable hydrogen bonds involved in the trimerization are indicated as dashed lines with the respective interacting amino acids as sticks. The hydrogen bonds with interacting atoms and distances are listed in the table.
Interaction of the antibody with TWEAK.
A) Ribbon representation of one Fab fragment binding to one TWEAK protomer (orange:TWEAK, blue:light chain, green:heavy chain). B) Stereo representation of the epitope recognition with interacting residues as labeled stick model and important hydrogen bond interaction highlighted as dashed lines. The binding is mainly mediated by CDR loop 1 and 2 of the heavy chain interacting with residues of the loops connecting strands D/E and B’/B and residues of strand G. In addition Y93 of CDR3 of the light chain interacts with a main chain N and stacks with the guanidinium group of R130 of TWEAK. C) Interestingly not only canonical CDR loops are involved in TWEAK binding, but an additional hydrogen bond is formed between light chain R68 of a non CDR loop with D75 of a second subunit of the trimeric TWEAK complex (gray).
Structure of human TWEAK.
A) Ribbon representations of the TWEAK trimer with one protomer colored orange and the symmetry related ones in gray (crystallographic 3-fold axis indicated as black triangle). On the left top view oriented as in 1A with N- and C-Terminus on the top. In the middle side view oriented as in 1B with labeled N- and C-Terminus. In the situation of the uncleaved precursor the membrane is located on top of the molecule. The disulfide bond is highlighted as stick model and beta strands are labeled according to TNF superfamily nomenclature. The dashed lines indicate flexible loops E-F and A-A’’ not visible in the electron density. On the right, bottom view of the TWEAK trimer. B) Solvent accessible electrostatic surface potential (red −4 kT to blue +4 kT) of the TWEAK trimer with the same orientations as in A. Resembling the high pI of TWEAK with 9.62 the complete upper surface is highly positively charged. A second basic patch is located at the side of the TWEAK trimer (dashed ellipse middle picture). This positively charged region is also found in other members of the TNF family (i.e. APRIL, BAFF) and coincides with their receptor binding site. C) Overview of the TWEAK-TWEAK interface as found in the homotrimer in the same orientation and labeled as in A (middle picture). Notable hydrogen bonds involved in the trimerization are indicated as dashed lines with the respective interacting amino acids as sticks. The hydrogen bonds with interacting atoms and distances are listed in the table.
Details of the TWEAK-TWEAK Interfaces
The biological relevant complex displays a 1∶1 stoichiometry. The epitope important for binding and specificity is located within a single TWEAK protomer and the Fabs do not bridge protomers in the trimer. The TWEAK protomer adopts the typical THD fold with a central sandwich of two five-stranded antiparallel β-strands with a smaller two-stranded one flanking them (Fig. 3A). The loops and strands harboring the residues of the antigenic epitope form part of one of the larger antiparallel β-sheets comprising strands B’, B, G, D and E. This sheet is facing the outside of the TWEAK trimer and is linked by a disulfide bond between residues C191 of strand E and C210 of strand F with the second five-stranded antiparallel β-sheet (Fig. 3A). The second sheet formed by strands A’, A, H, C and F is located inside mainly mediating the trimerization of TWEAK. The buried surface area between the TWEAK protomers is approximately 800 Å2, which is in agreement with the numbers for interactions of proteins of that size [60]. The interface spans almost the complete height of the molecule. Residues belonging to strands H, C, F and loop G’-H of one TWEAK protomer interact with residues of strands F and C of the corresponding sheet in the other protomer. Additional interactions are formed to strand E of the second large β-sheet as well as to loop E-F (Fig. 3C). In total, ten hydrogen bonds are formed in the core interface (listed in Fig. 3C). Together with some hydrophobic interactions these contacts lead to a tight self-trimerization of TWEAK. The trimeric state is important for the biological function as the trimerization of the Fn14 receptor upon TWEAK binding triggers the intracellular signaling. Since the signaling can be triggered by the membrane bound full length TWEAK [13], it is likely that the TWEAK precursor is already trimerized on the membrane.
TWEAK Surface Properties and Model for Fn14 Interaction
To analyze surface properties of TWEAK, we calculated the electrostatic potential for the solvent accessible surface of the soluble TWEAK trimer. The surface potential reveals a basic patch located at the side of the TWEAK trimer (Fig. 3B middle and Fig. 4A). In our structure, this region is covered by the Fab fragment, which is derived from an antibody directed against disrupting the TWEAK-Fn14 interaction. Thus, it is likely that the basic patch is directly involved in the TWEAK-Fn14 interaction. To learn more about the interaction of TWEAK with its receptor, we first superimposed available structures of THDs in complex with the CRDs of their receptors, in particular APRIL (a proliferation inducing ligand) THD with BCMA (B cell maturation) CRD (PDB ID 1XU2), APRIL THD with TACI (Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 13B, also known as TNFRSF13B) CRD (PDB ID 1XU1), TALL THD with BCMACRD (PDB ID 1OQD) and TALL CRD with BAFFR (receptor for B-cell activating factor) THD (PDB ID 1OQE)]. In fact, in all experimentally derived THD-CRD complexes, the receptors bind the cytokine at the position of the positive patch (Fig. 4B). Using this information, together with the NMR structure of humanFn14CRD (PDB ID 2RPJ), we can generate a model for TWEAK-Fn14 by superimposing the humanTWEAK structure with THDs and the NMR structure of Fn14 with the CRDs of the experimentally determined complexes. The model of the TWEAK-Fn14 complex is shown in Fig. 4C and can explain receptor trimerization without any observable clashes between the three Fn14 molecules.
Figure 4
Model of the TWEAK – Fn14 receptor interaction.
A) Side view of the TWEAK trimer showing the solvent accessible electrostatic surface potential (red −4 kT to blue +4 kT). The positively charged patch indicating the possible receptor binding site (dashed ellipse) is covered by the antibody selected for inhibiting TWEAK-Fn14 interaction (cartoon model of Hv in green and Lv in blue). B) Same view as in A with the antibody and TWEAK surface set transparence. After superposition of cytokine-receptor structures APRIL-BCMA (blue; PDB ID 1XU2), APRIL-TACI (brown; PDB ID 1XU1), TALL-BCMA (red; PDB ID 1OQD) and TALL-BAFFR (green; PDB ID 1OQE) the CRD of the receptors co-localize and mark the putative binding site of Fn14 on TWEAK (only the CRD of the receptors is shown as colored cartoon model). C) The NMR model of the Fn14 CRD (blue; PDB ID 2RPJ) is placed at the putative receptor binding site of TWEAK according to the complex structures shown in B. The basic patch is indicated with the dashed ellipse. Only one of the three receptors is shown. D) Stereo view of the modeled TWEAK-Fn14 CRD interface. Upon rigid body and positional refinement of the putative TWEAK-Fn14 CRD complex a dense hydrogen bond network is formed at the interface. The perfect complementarities of charged and hydrophobic patches, as well as the involvement of Fn14 side chains already shown to play an important role in TWEAK binding support this model.
Model of the TWEAK – Fn14 receptor interaction.
A) Side view of the TWEAK trimer showing the solvent accessible electrostatic surface potential (red −4 kT to blue +4 kT). The positively charged patch indicating the possible receptor binding site (dashed ellipse) is covered by the antibody selected for inhibiting TWEAK-Fn14 interaction (cartoon model of Hv in green and Lv in blue). B) Same view as in A with the antibody and TWEAK surface set transparence. After superposition of cytokine-receptor structures APRIL-BCMA (blue; PDB ID 1XU2), APRIL-TACI (brown; PDB ID 1XU1), TALL-BCMA (red; PDB ID 1OQD) and TALL-BAFFR (green; PDB ID 1OQE) the CRD of the receptors co-localize and mark the putative binding site of Fn14 on TWEAK (only the CRD of the receptors is shown as colored cartoon model). C) The NMR model of the Fn14CRD (blue; PDB ID 2RPJ) is placed at the putative receptor binding site of TWEAK according to the complex structures shown in B. The basic patch is indicated with the dashed ellipse. Only one of the three receptors is shown. D) Stereo view of the modeled TWEAK-Fn14CRD interface. Upon rigid body and positional refinement of the putative TWEAK-Fn14CRD complex a dense hydrogen bond network is formed at the interface. The perfect complementarities of charged and hydrophobic patches, as well as the involvement of Fn14 side chains already shown to play an important role in TWEAK binding support this model.To minimize energy of the complex model we used rigid body and positional refinement with CNS [58], which resulted in a highly complementary and specific binding interface between TWEAK and Fn14. The buried surface area of approximately 460 Å2 for the TWEAK-Fn14 interaction is smaller than for the other THD-CRD complexes. However, one can expect some rearrangements of the Fn14 molecule upon TWEAK binding compared to the present NMR structure in solution, which might lead to an increased interaction surface. Regardless of such rearrangements, the highly complementary interface, with approximately ten potential hydrogen bonds between the Fn14CRD and TWEAK in the model, suggests a sufficiently strong receptor cytokine interaction, in agreement with the low experimental Kd values of ∼ 0.8–2.4 nM. In our model, the charged side chains of Fn14 residues D45, D47, K48, R58 and D62 recognize TWEAK and form the dense hydrogen bond network. This is in accordance with mutational analysis showing the importance of D45, K48 and D62 for TWEAK binding, but e.g. S38 and P56, which do not form direct interactions, being dispensable [61]. Thus, the model is consistent with and can nicely explain mutagenesis data.
TWEAK Surface Properties and Model for HSPG Interaction
A second highly positively charged area spans the top of the TWEAK trimer (Fig. 3B left). A similar basic patch is observed for APRIL and other related molecules of the TNF family, indicating that this surface area is functionally important. In the case of APRIL, this basic patch is shown to bind to negatively charged sulphated side chains of HSPG. While binding of one soluble APRIL trimer to the receptor is not sufficient for signaling, the multimerization of APRIL upon interaction with the HSPGs and thereby the oligomerization of the receptors efficiently triggers signaling [62]–[66]. A similar observation was made for BAFF, TNF, CD95L, TRAIL and recently for TWEAK [13], [67]–[70]. Thus, consistent with these data, the positive patch on the TWEAK molecule is well suited and a likely surface area for a possible interaction with HSPGs.
Discussion
Research over the past years established TWEAK as a multifunctional cytokine accompanying a key role in the various physiological processes especially tissue regeneration and reorganization [27]–[34]. Disregulation of the TWEAK-Fn14 cytokine receptor axis is involved in numerous pathological events including cancer (reviewed in [71]), chronic autoimmune diseases [20], [42]–[47] and acute ischaemic stroke [48]–[50], [72]. Accordingly, TWEAK is an interesting target in the development of antibody-based therapies against these diseases. Although several studies addressed the function of TWEAK and its receptor Fn14 in these processes in vitro and in vivo, no structural information of TWEAK or its interaction with Fn14 is available. In this study we report the crystal structure of the soluble form of humanTWEAK in complex with the Fab fragment of a neutralizing antibody to obtain information on the structural features of TWEAK.The complex formation with the Fab fragment was beneficial in several ways. The binding of the Fab fragment to humanTWEAK greatly improved the handling of the protein. Whereas the free protein easily sticks to size exclusion matrices, the complex could easily be desalted and concentrated in complex with the Fab. In addition, neutralizing antibodies selected for the inhibition of ligand-receptor binding likely bind or block this interaction and can help determine the location of the receptor-ligand interface. Finally, the structure helps to develop antibody-based therapies against diseases where TWEAK is implicated. Comparison with available structures of other TNF superfamily members in complex with the CRD of their receptors revealed the putative receptor binding site on TWEAK, and this binding site is exploited and shielded by the Fab fragments. Based on this information we could also generate a model between humanTWEAK and the Fn14CRD that nicely explains and is supported by published mutational studies.The interaction between TWEAK and its receptor is in contrast to many other TNF ligands and receptors unique [4]. This property makes the TWEAK-Fn14 axis as therapeutic targets especially interesting and potentially superior to other TNF family members. The occurrence of undesired side effects might be reduced compared to targeting ligands binding multiple receptors or receptors accepting different ligands. The presented structure shed light for the first time on the rather specific molecular recognition of TWEAK by Fn14 and provides a basis for the development and improvement of therapeutic molecules highly specific for targeting these two proteins. Our model provides a first glimpse into the specific interaction of TWEAK with Fn14. The superposition of the TWEAK structure and the NMR structure of the Fn14 onto available experimentally determined structures of related complexes resulted in a model that could be easily energy minimized to remove any residual clashes and possesses a highly complementary interface. In fact, the suggested specific hydrogen bonding and ion pair network is consistent with mutational analysis and explains the unique formation of the TWEAK-Fn14 complex. Furthermore, the model is consistent with Fn14 trimerization, which is an integral part of TWEAK mediated signaling.Apart from TWEAK-mediated trimerization of Fn14, efficient signaling is only achieved by Fn14 oligomerization [73]. Receptor oligomerization is achieved either by membrane bound full length TWEAK or, in analogy to other TNF superfamily members, by binding of soluble TWEAK to HSPGs [13], [65]. In contrast to the specific interface between Fn14 and TWEAK, the identified basic patch on the opposite side of the receptor binding region of soluble TWEAK is likely to serve as a platform for binding to the negatively charged HSPG, via electrostatically driven interactions. Similarly, this positively charged surface is also found on related cytokines such as APRIL and hence suggests that HSPG-mediated stimulation of receptor oligomerization has related mechanisms in different THD-CRD complexes [63], [64].In summary, we were able to obtain the first structural information of soluble humanTWEAK. The crystallization was supported by the formation of a stable complex with the Fab fragment of a neutralizing antibody. Based on the comparison of the obtained TWEAK structure with published TNF ligand receptor structures, we were able to model a putative TWEAK-Fn14 complex. Furthermore, we identified a large positive surface patch that is likely to serve as a binding platform for TWEAK to negatively charged HSPG, thereby regulating the levels of TWEAK. Taken together our findings provide the profound molecular basis for future studies on the pleiotropic cytokine and potential drug target TWEAK and its receptor Fn14.
Accession Number
Coordinates and structure factors for the crystal structure of humanTWEAK in complex with a therapeutic antibody Fab fragment have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank with accession code 4HT1.
Authors: Aniela Jakubowski; Christine Ambrose; Michael Parr; John M Lincecum; Monica Z Wang; Timothy S Zheng; Beth Browning; Jennifer S Michaelson; Manfred Baetscher; Manfred Baestcher; Bruce Wang; D Montgomery Bissell; Linda C Burkly Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2005-08-18 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Thomas C Terwilliger; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Pavel V Afonine; Nigel W Moriarty; Peter H Zwart; Li Wei Hung; Randy J Read; Paul D Adams Journal: Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr Date: 2007-12-05
Authors: Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read Journal: J Appl Crystallogr Date: 2007-07-13 Impact factor: 3.304
Authors: Harshil Dhruv; Joseph C Loftus; Pooja Narang; Joachim L Petit; Maureen Fameree; Julien Burton; Giresse Tchegho; Donald Chow; Holly Yin; Yousef Al-Abed; Michael E Berens; Nhan L Tran; Nathalie Meurice Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-09-20 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Earl F Albone; Jared L Spidel; Xin Cheng; Young Chul Park; Sara Jacob; Andrew Z Milinichik; Ben Vaessen; Janet Butler; J Bradford Kline; Luigi Grasso Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Clara T Schoeder; Samuel Schmitz; Jared Adolf-Bryfogle; Alexander M Sevy; Jessica A Finn; Marion F Sauer; Nina G Bozhanova; Benjamin K Mueller; Amandeep K Sangha; Jaume Bonet; Jonathan H Sheehan; Georg Kuenze; Brennica Marlow; Shannon T Smith; Hope Woods; Brian J Bender; Cristina E Martina; Diego Del Alamo; Pranav Kodali; Alican Gulsevin; William R Schief; Bruno E Correia; James E Crowe; Jens Meiler; Rocco Moretti Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Joerg Thomas Regula; Sabine Imhof-Jung; Michael Mølhøj; Joerg Benz; Andreas Ehler; Alexander Bujotzek; Wolfgang Schaefer; Christian Klein Journal: Protein Eng Des Sel Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 1.650