BACKGROUND: Awareness of colorectal cancer and decision for colorectal cancer screening is influenced by multiple factors including ethnicity, level of education, and adherence to regular medical follow up. OBJECTIVE: Our survey aimed at assessing barriers to colorectal cancer screening among urban population. DESIGN: This study is a survey of the general population. SETTING: This study was made at a local community in the downtown area of a metropolitan city. PATIENTS/ SUBJECTS: The study population for this survey included 2000 non-institutionalized residents from local community of Brooklyn downtown area of City of Brooklyn, NY, USA. All participants were 50 years or older. INTERVENTION: No intervention was done. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The survey questionnaire collected information about demographic, socioeconomic level, awareness of various cancers and their screening methods, and awareness of screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Colonoscopy was identified as the best screening test by 31 % of the subjects. Pain and discomfort was the major reason for not having a colonoscopy. The fear of a complication declined significantly after the first colonoscopy but fear of pain and discomfort increased. Difficulty with bowel preparation before a colonoscopy was a significant problem; it discouraged significant number of participants from having another colonoscopy. LIMITATION: This study is limited by its small sample size. CONCLUSION: Physician/family and peer influence seems important but influencing only a minority of subjects. Fear of complications should be allayed using accurate statistical information. Pain should be significantly diminished and/or eliminated during colonoscopy. Future research should focus to minimize complexity and discomfort associated with bowel preparation.
BACKGROUND: Awareness of colorectal cancer and decision for colorectal cancer screening is influenced by multiple factors including ethnicity, level of education, and adherence to regular medical follow up. OBJECTIVE: Our survey aimed at assessing barriers to colorectal cancer screening among urban population. DESIGN: This study is a survey of the general population. SETTING: This study was made at a local community in the downtown area of a metropolitan city. PATIENTS/ SUBJECTS: The study population for this survey included 2000 non-institutionalized residents from local community of Brooklyn downtown area of City of Brooklyn, NY, USA. All participants were 50 years or older. INTERVENTION: No intervention was done. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The survey questionnaire collected information about demographic, socioeconomic level, awareness of various cancers and their screening methods, and awareness of screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Colonoscopy was identified as the best screening test by 31 % of the subjects. Pain and discomfort was the major reason for not having a colonoscopy. The fear of a complication declined significantly after the first colonoscopy but fear of pain and discomfort increased. Difficulty with bowel preparation before a colonoscopy was a significant problem; it discouraged significant number of participants from having another colonoscopy. LIMITATION: This study is limited by its small sample size. CONCLUSION: Physician/family and peer influence seems important but influencing only a minority of subjects. Fear of complications should be allayed using accurate statistical information. Pain should be significantly diminished and/or eliminated during colonoscopy. Future research should focus to minimize complexity and discomfort associated with bowel preparation.
Authors: David A Etzioni; Ninez A Ponce; Susan H Babey; Benjamin A Spencer; E Richard Brown; Clifford Y Ko; Neetu Chawla; Nancy Breen; Carrie N Klabunde Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-12-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: D M Eddy; F W Nugent; J F Eddy; J Coller; V Gilbertsen; L S Gottlieb; R Rice; P Sherlock; S Winawer Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1987-03 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Taylor Murray; Alicia Samuels; Asma Ghafoor; Elizabeth Ward; Michael J Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Ann Scheck McAlearney; Katherine W Reeves; Stephanie L Dickinson; Kimberly M Kelly; Cathy Tatum; Mira L Katz; Electra D Paskett Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1993-12-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Chinedum Ojinnaka; Ann Vuong; Janet Helduser; Philip Nash; Marcia G Ory; David A McClellan; Jane N Bolin Journal: J Community Health Date: 2015-04
Authors: Stuart A Coleman; Silvia C Tapia-Siles; Markus Pakleppa; Jan B Vorstius; Robert P Keatch; Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Marisol Gálvez; Angel Mario Zarate; Hector Espino; Fátima Higuera-de la Tijera; Richard Alexander Awad; Santiago Camacho Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2017-11-21