Literature DB >> 3102307

Screening for colorectal cancer in a high-risk population. Results of a mathematical model.

D M Eddy, F W Nugent, J F Eddy, J Coller, V Gilbertsen, L S Gottlieb, R Rice, P Sherlock, S Winawer.   

Abstract

A mathematical model was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening strategies for people who are at high risk because of a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer. The model uses indirect evidence about such factors as cancer incidence, sensitivity and specificity of different tests, and treatment effectiveness. The analysis indicates that for screening people over 40 yr old an annual fecal occult blood test may reduce colorectal cancer mortality by about one-third, either colonoscopy or barium enema may reduce mortality by approximately 85%, a 3-5-yr frequency for endoscopies or barium enemas preserves 70%-90% of the effectiveness of an annual frequency, and beginning screening at age 50 reduces effectiveness by 5%-10%. Although both barium enemas and colonoscopies appear to be effective in reducing mortality, the lower cost of the barium enema makes it a more cost-effective strategy. All of these estimates depend on the baseline estimates of each of the factors incorporated in the model; the conclusions are most sensitive to assumptions about the natural history of adenomatous polyps, the bleeding of adenomas and presymptomatic cancers, and the sensitivity of the fecal occult blood test. Recommendations about colorectal cancer screening must also consider factors such as discomfort, inconvenience, and the availability of various technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3102307     DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90018-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  25 in total

Review 1.  The limited incorporation of economic analyses in clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Joel F Wallace; Scott R Weingarten; Chiun-Fang Chiou; James M Henning; Andriana A Hohlbauch; Margaret S Richards; Nicole S Herzog; Lior S Lewensztain; Joshua J Ofman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Guidance on large bowel surveillance for people with two first degree relatives with colorectal cancer or one first degree relative diagnosed with colorectal cancer under 45 years.

Authors:  M G Dunlop
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Energy imbalance and cancer of the breast, colon and prostate.

Authors:  A P Simopoulos
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1990

4.  Results of a pilot study of endoscopic screening of first degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients in Italy.

Authors:  L Colombo; G Corti; F Magrì; A Marocchi; P Brambilla; C Crespi; L Manieri; S Ghezzi; D Giannone; L Merlino; P Mocarelli
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Familial colorectal cancer: discussion paper.

Authors:  M J Underwood; V W Johnson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Cost-effective management of colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  J A Heine; D A Rothenberger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Screening for gastrointestinal cancer: an epidemiological review.

Authors:  J Weil; M J Langman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  A systematic comparison of microsimulation models of colorectal cancer: the role of assumptions about adenoma progression.

Authors:  Karen M Kuntz; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Carolyn M Rutter; Amy B Knudsen; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; James E Savarino; Eric J Feuer; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in high-risk Spanish patients: use of a validated model to inform public policy.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Angel Ferrandez; Angel Lanas
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Colorectal cancer. Can we lower the death rate in the 1990s?

Authors:  J J Donald; H J Burhenne
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.