Literature DB >> 23663559

Outcome of 12-month surveillance colonoscopy in high-risk patients in the National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

T J W Lee1, C Nickerson, A F Goddard, C J Rees, R J Q McNally, M D Rutter.   

Abstract

AIM: Current British guidelines recommend surveillance colonoscopy at 12 months for individuals found to have five or more adenomas, or three or more adenomas of which at least one is ≥ 1 cm in size. This study describes the yield of surveillance colonoscopy in this group and explores patient and clinical factors that may be associated with the presence of advanced adenomas or cancer at surveillance.
METHOD: Data were retrieved from the national database of the National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. The detection of advanced colonic neoplasia (ACN, cancer or advanced adenoma) was used as the main outcome variable. Multivariable analysis was used to analyse relationships between patient factors (age, gender, body mass index, smoking and alcohol use) and clinical findings (number, size and nature of adenomas detected during index colonoscopy) with the outcome variable.
RESULTS: One-thousand, seven-hundred and sixty individuals were included in the study. The yield of ACN at 12-month surveillance was 6.6% (116/1760), of which 14/1760 (0.8%) had colorectal cancer. Nine (64.3%) of these 14 cancers were Dukes A at diagnosis. The presence of a villous adenoma or a right-sided adenoma at screening colonoscopy was associated with ORs of 1.98 (95% CI: 1.11-3.53, P = 0.012) and 1.76 (95% CI: 1.13-2.74, P = 0.020), respectively, for detection of ACN at surveillance.
CONCLUSION: Twelve-month surveillance colonoscopy is necessary in this group of patients. The presence of villous or proximal lesions at baseline is associated with increased risk of ACN at surveillance. Site and histological type of baseline lesions may be relevant for determining the surveillance interval. Colorectal Disease
© 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; cancer; epidemiology

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23663559     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  4 in total

Review 1.  Surveillance of colonic polyps: Are we getting it right?

Authors:  Stewart N Bonnington; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; James East; Colin J Rees; Neil Cripps; James Docherty; Sunil Dolwani; Philip V Kaye; Kevin J Monahan; Marco R Novelli; Andrew Plumb; Brian P Saunders; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Damian J M Tolan; Sophie Whyte; Stewart Bonnington; Alison Scope; Ruth Wong; Barbara Hibbert; John Marsh; Billie Moores; Amanda Cross; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 31.793

3.  Eicosapentaenoic acid and aspirin, alone and in combination, for the prevention of colorectal adenomas (seAFOod Polyp Prevention trial): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial.

Authors:  Mark A Hull; Kirsty Sprange; Trish Hepburn; Wei Tan; Aisha Shafayat; Colin J Rees; Gayle Clifford; Richard F Logan; Paul M Loadman; Elizabeth A Williams; Diane Whitham; Alan A Montgomery
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Colorectal Cancer Risk Following Adenoma Removal: A Large Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Helen G Coleman; Maurice B Loughrey; Liam J Murray; Brian T Johnston; Anna T Gavin; Martha J Shrubsole; Shivaram K Bhat; Patrick B Allen; Vivienne McConnell; Marie M Cantwell
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.254

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.