Literature DB >> 23661403

Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes after surgery: a Cochrane Systematic Review.

M P W Grocott1, A Dushianthan, M A Hamilton, M G Mythen, D Harrison, K Rowan.   

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the clinical effects of increasing perioperative blood flow using fluids with or without inotropes/vasoactive drugs to explicit defined goals in adults. We included randomized controlled trials of adult patients (aged 16 years or older) undergoing surgery. We included 31 studies of 5292 participants. There was no difference in mortality at the longest follow-up: 282/2615 (10.8%) died in the control group and 238/2677 (8.9%) in the treatment group, RR of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.76-1.05; P=0.18). However, the results were sensitive to analytical methods and withdrawal of studies with methodological limitations. The intervention reduced the rate of three morbidities (renal failure, respiratory failure, and wound infections) but not the rates of arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, congestive cardiac failure, venous thrombosis, and other types of infections. The number of patients with complications was also reduced by the intervention. Hospital length of stay was reduced in the treatment group by 1.16 days. There was no difference in critical care length of stay. The primary analysis of this review showed no difference between groups but this result was sensitive to the method of analysis, withdrawal of studies with methodological limitations, and was dominated by a single large study. Patients receiving this intervention stayed in hospital 1 day less with fewer complications. It is unlikely that the intervention causes harm. The balance of current evidence does not support widespread implementation of this approach to reduce mortality but does suggest that complications and duration of hospital stay are reduced.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fluid therapy; perioperative care; surgery

Year:  2013        PMID: 23661403     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  53 in total

1.  Our study 20 years on: a randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  Owen Boyd; R Michael Grounds
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Sanders; S Servaas; C Slagt
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  [Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy: Concepts, indications and risks].

Authors:  S A Haas; B Saugel; C J Trepte; D A Reuter
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Impact of early haemodynamic goal-directed therapy in patients undergoing emergency surgery: an open prospective, randomised trial.

Authors:  Gordana Pavlovic; John Diaper; Christoph Ellenberger; Angela Frei; Karim Bendjelid; Fanny Bonhomme; Marc Licker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Essential Elements for Enhanced Recovery After Intra-abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Amir Elhassan; Ihab Elhassan; Amjad Elhassan; Krish D Sekar; Ryan E Rubin; Richard D Urman; Elyse M Cornett; Alan David Kaye
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2019-03-11

6.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Beat-by-beat assessment of cardiac afterload using descending aortic velocity-pressure loop during general anesthesia: a pilot study.

Authors:  Fabrice Vallée; Arthur Le Gall; Jona Joachim; Olivier Passouant; Joaquim Matéo; Arnaud Mari; Sandrine Millasseau; Alexandre Mebazaa; Etienne Gayat
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  What is the Goal of Fluid Management "Optimization"?

Authors:  Giorgio Della Rocca; Luigi Vetrugno
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2016-10-01

9.  Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Regimens in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mikaela L Garland; Hamish S Mace; Andrew D MacCormick; Stuart A McCluskey; Nicholas J Lightfoot
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  A comparison of the non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the oesophageal Doppler monitor during major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Luke E Hodgson; Lui G Forni; Richard Venn; Theophilus L Samuels; Howard G Wakeling
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2015-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.