Literature DB >> 28108832

Beat-by-beat assessment of cardiac afterload using descending aortic velocity-pressure loop during general anesthesia: a pilot study.

Fabrice Vallée1,2,3,4, Arthur Le Gall5,6,7,8, Jona Joachim5,6,7,8, Olivier Passouant5,6,7, Joaquim Matéo5,7, Arnaud Mari9, Sandrine Millasseau10, Alexandre Mebazaa5,6,7, Etienne Gayat5,6,7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Continuous cardiac afterload evaluation could represent a useful tool during general anesthesia (GA) to titrate vasopressor effect. Using beat to beat descending aortic pressure(P)/flow velocity(U) loop obtained from esophageal Doppler and femoral pressure signals might allow to track afterload changes. Methods We defined three angles characterizing the PU loop (alpha, beta and Global After-Load Angle (GALA)). Augmentation index (AIx) and total arterial compliance (Ctot) were measured via radial tonometry. Peripheral Vascular Resistances (PVR) were also calculated. Twenty patients were recruited and classified into low and high cardiovascular (CV) risk group. Vasopressors were administered, when baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) fell by 20%. Results We studied 118 pairs of pre/post bolus measurements. At baseline, patients in the lower CV risk group had higher cardiac output (6.1 ± 1.7 vs 4.2 ± 0.6 L min; p = 0.005), higher Ctot (2.7 ± 1.0 vs 2.0 ± 0.4 ml/mmHg, p = 0.033), lower AIx and PVR (13 ± 10 vs 32 ± 11% and 1011 ± 318 vs 1390 ± 327 dyn s/cm5; p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively) and lower GALA (41 ± 15 vs 68 ± 6°; p < 0.001). GALA was the only PU Loop parameter associated with Ctot, AIx and PVR. After vasopressors, MAP increase was associated with a decrease in Ctot, an increase in AIx and PVR and an increase in alpha, beta and GALA (p < 0.001 for all). Changes in GALA and Ctot after vasopressors were strongly associated (p = 0.004). Conclusions PU Loop assessment from routine invasive hemodynamic optimization management during GA and especially GALA parameter could monitor cardiac afterload continuously in anesthetized patients, and may help clinicians to titrate vasopressor therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arteries; Blood flow velocity; Compliance; Pressure; Pulse; Ventricular function, Left

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28108832     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-017-9982-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  37 in total

1.  Alterations in pulmonary and peripheral vascular resistance in immersion hypothermia.

Authors:  L A KUHN; J K TURNER
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1959-05       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Hospital stay and mortality are increased in patients having a "triple low" of low blood pressure, low bispectral index, and low minimum alveolar concentration of volatile anesthesia.

Authors:  Daniel I Sessler; Jeffrey C Sigl; Scott D Kelley; Nassib G Chamoun; Paul J Manberg; Leif Saager; Andrea Kurz; Scott Greenwald
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 3.  Arterial stiffness: basic concepts and measurement techniques.

Authors:  Julio A Chirinos
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Resolving the time lag between pressure and flow for the determination of local wave speed in elastic tubes and arteries.

Authors:  M J P Swalen; A W Khir
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Guidelines for perioperative haemodynamic optimization.

Authors:  B Vallet; Y Blanloeil; B Cholley; G Orliaguet; S Pierre; B Tavernier
Journal:  Ann Fr Anesth Reanim       Date:  2013-10-11

6.  Noninvasive determination of local pulse wave velocity and wave intensity: changes with age and gender in the carotid and femoral arteries of healthy human.

Authors:  Alessandra Borlotti; Ashraf W Khir; Ernst R Rietzschel; Marc L De Buyzere; Sebastian Vermeersch; Patrick Segers
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-06-07

7.  [The compliance of the large elastic arteries after blood pressure-lowering therapy with a calcium antagonist].

Authors:  R E Schmieder; F H Messerli
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1995-06-23       Impact factor: 0.628

8.  Intraaortic pulse pressure amplification in subjects at high coronary risk.

Authors:  Mohamed Temmar; Piotr Jankowski; Marcel Peltier; Vincent Mouquet; Dorota Debicka-Dabrowska; Farah Hamida; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz; Michel E Safar
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes after surgery: a Cochrane Systematic Review.

Authors:  M P W Grocott; A Dushianthan; M A Hamilton; M G Mythen; D Harrison; K Rowan
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Perioperative fluid therapy: a statement from the international Fluid Optimization Group.

Authors:  Lais Helena Camacho Navarro; Joshua A Bloomstone; Jose Otavio Costa Auler; Maxime Cannesson; Giorgio Della Rocca; Tong J Gan; Michael Kinsky; Sheldon Magder; Timothy E Miller; Monty Mythen; Azriel Perel; Daniel A Reuter; Michael R Pinsky; George C Kramer
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2015-04-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  Velocity-pressure loops for continuous assessment of ventricular afterload: influence of pressure measurement site.

Authors:  Jona Joachim; Fabrice Vallée; Arthur Le Gall; Joaquim Matéo; Stéphanie Lenck; Sandrine Millasseau; Emmanuel Houdart; Alexandre Mebazaa; Etienne Gayat
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Monitoring of cardiovascular physiology augmented by a patient-specific biomechanical model during general anesthesia. A proof of concept study.

Authors:  Arthur Le Gall; Fabrice Vallée; Kuberan Pushparajah; Tarique Hussain; Alexandre Mebazaa; Dominique Chapelle; Étienne Gayat; Radomír Chabiniok
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Moritz Flick; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Estimation of cardiac output variations induced by hemodynamic interventions using multi-beat analysis of arterial waveform: a comparative off-line study with transesophageal Doppler method during non-cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Arthur Le Gall; Fabrice Vallée; Jona Joachim; Alex Hong; Joaquim Matéo; Alexandre Mebazaa; Etienne Gayat
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.977

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.