Literature DB >> 23660740

The effects of attentional load on saccadic task switching.

Jason L Chan1, Joseph F X DeSouza.   

Abstract

Everyday life requires the ability to flexibly switch between tasks. Often, task switching is accompanied by concurrent cognitive activities that compete for limited attentional resources. This study aimed to characterize the effects of attentional load on task switching. In experiment 1, participants performed an interleaved pro-saccade and anti-saccade task. In experiment 2, participants performed an interleaved pro-saccade and anti-saccade task simultaneously with a rapid serial visual presentation task that has been shown to create an attentional load. Error rates and reaction times of pro-saccades and anti-saccades were analysed for both experiments separately and together. Overall, error rates and reaction times increased with attentional load. With attentional load, switches to pro-saccades were associated with increased error rates and reaction times, whereas switches to anti-saccades were only associated with increased error rates. We propose that attentional load interferes with neural task-set representation and that the resulting executive control is different for the dominant and non-dominant task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23660740     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3452-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  39 in total

1.  The effect of cognitive load on saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  E Stuyven; K Van der Goten; A Vandierendonck; K Claeys; L Crevits
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  Limitations in information processing in the human brain: neuroimaging of dual task performance and working memory tasks.

Authors:  T Klingberg
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.453

3.  Wisconsin Card Sorting revisited: distinct neural circuits participating in different stages of the task identified by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  O Monchi; M Petrides; V Petre; K Worsley; A Dagher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Antisaccades and task-switching: interactions in controlled processing.

Authors:  Mariya V Cherkasova; Dara S Manoach; James M Intriligator; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The role of the frontal cortex in task preparation.

Authors:  Marcel Brass; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Exploring the consequences of the previous trial.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Preparatory set associated with pro-saccades and anti-saccades in humans investigated with event-related FMRI.

Authors:  Joseph F X DeSouza; Ravi S Menon; Stefan Everling
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Between-task competition and cognitive control in task switching.

Authors:  Nick Yeung; Leigh E Nystrom; Jessica A Aronson; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Frontoparietal activation with preparation for antisaccades.

Authors:  Matthew R G Brown; Tutis Vilis; Stefan Everling
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Neural processes associated with antisaccade task performance investigated with event-related FMRI.

Authors:  Kristen A Ford; Herbert C Goltz; Matthew R G Brown; Stefan Everling
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  11 in total

1.  Alternating between pro- and antisaccades: switch-costs manifest via decoupling the spatial relations between stimulus and response.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Caitlin Gillen; Ashna Samani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neural correlates for task switching in the macaque superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jason L Chan; Michael J Koval; Kevin Johnston; Stefan Everling
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Disassociation between brain activation and executive function in fragile X premutation females.

Authors:  Annie L Shelton; Kim Cornish; Meaghan Clough; Sanuji Gajamange; Scott Kolbe; Joanne Fielding
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Freezing of gait is associated with increased saccade latency and variability in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Samuel T Nemanich; Gammon M Earhart
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Pro- and antisaccade task-switching: response suppression-and not vector inversion-contributes to a task-set inertia.

Authors:  Benjamin Tari; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The inter-trial effect of prepared but not executed antisaccades.

Authors:  Shanna Yeung; Cristina Rubino; Jaya Viswanathan; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Back to basics: The effects of block vs. interleaved trial administration on pro- and anti-saccade performance.

Authors:  Liran Zeligman; Ari Z Zivotofsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Multiple sclerosis: Executive dysfunction, task switching and the role of attention.

Authors:  M Clough; P Foletta; A N Frohman; D Sears; A Ternes; O B White; J Fielding
Journal:  Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin       Date:  2018-04-17

9.  Response suppression delays the planning of subsequent stimulus-driven saccades.

Authors:  Jeffrey Weiler; Trina Mitchell; Matthew Heath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Brain structure and intragenic DNA methylation are correlated, and predict executive dysfunction in fragile X premutation females.

Authors:  A L Shelton; K M Cornish; S Kolbe; M Clough; H R Slater; X Li; C M Kraan; Q M Bui; D E Godler; J Fielding
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 6.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.