Literature DB >> 17596416

Frontoparietal activation with preparation for antisaccades.

Matthew R G Brown1, Tutis Vilis, Stefan Everling.   

Abstract

Several current models hold that frontoparietal areas exert cognitive control by biasing task-relevant processing in other brain areas. Previous event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have compared prosaccades and antisaccades, which require subjects to look toward or away from a flashed peripheral stimulus, respectively. These studies found greater activation for antisaccades in frontal and parietal regions at the ends of long (>or=6 s) preparatory periods preceding peripheral stimulus presentation. Event-related fMRI studies using short preparatory periods (<or=4 s) have not found such activation differences except in the frontal eye field. Here, we identified activation differences associated with short (1-s) preparatory periods by interleaving half trials among regular whole trials in a rapid fMRI design. On whole trials, a colored fixation dot instructed human subjects to make either a prosaccade toward or an antisaccade away from a peripheral visual stimulus. Half trials included only the instruction and not peripheral stimulus presentation or saccade generation. Nonetheless, half trials evoked stronger activation on antisaccades than on prosaccades in the frontal eye field (FEF), supplementary eye field (SEF), left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), intraparietal sulcus (IPS), and precuneus. Greater antisaccade response-related activation was found in FEF, SEF, IPS, and precuneus but not in DLPFC or ACC. These results demonstrate greater preparatory activation for antisaccades versus prosaccades in frontoparietal areas and suggest that prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex are more involved in presetting the saccade network for the antisaccade task than generating the actual antisaccade response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17596416     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00460.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  64 in total

1.  Perception and action selection dissociate human ventral and dorsal cortex.

Authors:  Akiko Ikkai; Trenton A Jerde; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Stimulation of the frontal eye field reveals persistent effective connectivity after controlled behavior.

Authors:  Rei Akaishi; Yosuke Morishima; Vivian P Rajeswaren; Shigeki Aoki; Katsuyuki Sakai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Alternating between pro- and antisaccades: switch-costs manifest via decoupling the spatial relations between stimulus and response.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Caitlin Gillen; Ashna Samani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions.

Authors:  Tara A Niendam; Angela R Laird; Kimberly L Ray; Y Monica Dean; David C Glahn; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic-macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance.

Authors:  Matt E Meier; Bridget A Smeekens; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Saccade preparation signals in the human frontal and parietal cortices.

Authors:  Clayton E Curtis; Jason D Connolly
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Microstimulation of monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex impairs antisaccade performance.

Authors:  Stephen P Wegener; Kevin Johnston; Stefan Everling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Trial type probability modulates the cost of antisaccades.

Authors:  Hui-Yan Chiau; Philip Tseng; Jia-Han Su; Ovid J L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung; Neil G Muggleton; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Effects of response preparation on developmental improvements in inhibitory control.

Authors:  Sarah Ordaz; Stephanie Davis; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-03-26

10.  Oculomotor performance identifies underlying cognitive deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Irene M Loe; Heidi M Feldman; Enami Yasui; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.829

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.