Literature DB >> 22441917

Assessment of quantitative perfusion parameters by dynamic contrast-enhanced sonography using a deconvolution method: an in vitro and in vivo study.

Marianne Gauthier1, Farid Tabarout, Ingrid Leguerney, Mélanie Polrot, Stéphanie Pitre, Pierre Peronneau, Nathalie Lassau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the arterial input on perfusion parameters measured using dynamic contrast-enhanced sonography combined with a deconvolution method after bolus injections of a contrast agent.
METHODS: The in vitro experiments were conducted using a custom-made setup consisting of pumping a fluid through a phantom made of 3 intertwined silicone pipes, mimicking a complex structure akin to that of vessels in a tumor, combined with their feeding pipe, mimicking the arterial input. In the in vivo experiments, B16F10 melanoma cells were xenografted to 5 nude mice. An ultrasound scanner combined with a linear transducer was used to perform pulse inversion imaging based on linear raw data throughout the experiments. A mathematical model developed by the Gustave Roussy Institute (patent WO/2008/053268) and based on the dye dilution theory was used to evaluate 7 semiquantitative perfusion parameters directly from time-intensity curves and 3 quantitative perfusion parameters from the residue function obtained after a deconvolution process developed in our laboratory based on the Tikhonov regularization method. We evaluated and compared the intraoperator variability values of perfusion parameters determined after these two signal-processing methods.
RESULTS: In vitro, semiquantitative perfusion parameters exhibited intraoperator variability values ranging from 3.39% to 13.60%. Quantitative parameters derived after the deconvolution process ranged from 4.46% to 11.82%. In vivo, tumors exhibited perfusion parameter intraoperator variability values ranging from 3.74% to 29.34%, whereas quantitative ones varied from 5.00% to 12.43%.
CONCLUSIONS: Taking into account the arterial input in evaluating perfusion parameters improves the intraoperator variability and may improve the dynamic contrast-enhanced sonographic technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22441917     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.4.595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  9 in total

1.  Correlation of ultrasound contrast agent derived blood flow parameters with immunohistochemical angiogenesis markers in murine xenograft tumor models.

Authors:  John R Eisenbrey; Christian C Wilson; Raymond J Ro; Traci B Fox; Ji-Bin Liu; See-Ying Chiou; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Impact of the arterial input function on microvascularization parameter measurements using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Authors:  Marianne Gauthier; Stéphanie Pitre-Champagnat; Farid Tabarout; Ingrid Leguerney; Mélanie Polrot; Nathalie Lassau
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-28

3.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Enterography and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Crohn's Disease: An Observational Comparison Study.

Authors:  Rune Wilkens; David A Peters; Agnete H Nielsen; Valeriya P Hovgaard; Henning Glerup; Klaus Krogh
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2017-02

4.  Interobserver Variation of the Bolus-and-Burst Method for Pancreatic Perfusion with Dynamic - Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.

Authors:  Marcus Stangeland; Trond Engjom; Martin Mezl; Radovan Jirik; Odd Helge Gilja; Georg Dimcevski; Kim Nylund
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2017-09-12

5.  Biomechanical Properties of Strictures in Crohn's Disease: Can Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Enterography Predict Stiffness?

Authors:  Rune Wilkens; Dong-Hua Liao; Hans Gregersen; Henning Glerup; David A Peters; Charlotte Buchard; Anders Tøttrup; Klaus Krogh
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-02

6.  Towards Dynamic Contrast Specific Ultrasound Tomography.

Authors:  Libertario Demi; Ruud J G Van Sloun; Hessel Wijkstra; Massimo Mischi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Validation of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in predicting outcomes of antiangiogenic therapy for solid tumors: the French multicenter support for innovative and expensive techniques study.

Authors:  Nathalie Lassau; Julia Bonastre; Michèle Kind; Valérie Vilgrain; Joëlle Lacroix; Marie Cuinet; Sophie Taieb; Richard Aziza; Antony Sarran; Catherine Labbe-Devilliers; Benoit Gallix; Olivier Lucidarme; Yvette Ptak; Laurence Rocher; Louis-Michel Caquot; Sophie Chagnon; Denis Marion; Alain Luciani; Sylvaine Feutray; Joëlle Uzan-Augui; Benedicte Coiffier; Baya Benastou; Serge Koscielny
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Optimal injection rate of ultrasound contrast agent for evaluation of focal liver lesions using an automatic power injector: a pilot study.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Sugimoto; Fuminori Moriyasu; Hirohito Takeuchi; Mayumi Kojima; Saori Ogawa; Takatomo Sano; Yoshihiro Furuichi; Yoshiyuki Kobayashi; Ikuo Nakamura
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-17

9.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the pancreas shows impaired perfusion in pancreas insufficient cystic fibrosis patients.

Authors:  Trond Engjom; Kim Nylund; Friedemann Erchinger; Marcus Stangeland; Birger Norderud Lærum; Martin Mézl; Radovan Jiřík; Odd Helge Gilja; Georg Dimcevski
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 1.930

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.