Literature DB >> 23658118

Sensitivity to changing contingencies in an impulsivity task.

Michael E Young1, Tara L Webb, Jillian M Rung, Eric A Jacobs.   

Abstract

Using a video-game-based escalating interest task, participants repeatedly encountered a reward that gradually increased in value over a 10-second interval. Responding early in the interval netted less immediate reward than responding later in the interval. Each participant experienced four different reward contingencies for waiting. These contingencies were changed three times as the experiment proceeded. Behavior tracked these changing contingencies, but wait times reflected long-term carryover from the previously assigned contingencies. Both the tendency to respond slowly and the optimality of behavior were affected by the order of contingencies experienced. Demographic variables only weakly predicted behavior, and delay discounting rate in a hypothetical money choice task predicted choice only when the contingencies in the game were weaker. © Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23658118      PMCID: PMC3900408          DOI: 10.1002/jeab.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  23 in total

Review 1.  Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.

Authors:  G Ainslie
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Andrea M Begotka; Bethany R Raiff; Lana L Kastern
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Subjective probability and delay.

Authors:  H Rachlin; A Raineri; D Cross
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Methodological considerations in the study of delay discounting in intertemporal choice: A comparison of tasks and modes.

Authors:  Carter L Smith; Donald A Hantula
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-11

5.  Human self-control and the density of reinforcement.

Authors:  S R Flora; W B Pavlik
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  James MacKillop; Michael T Amlung; Lauren R Few; Lara A Ray; Lawrence H Sweet; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire.

Authors:  T F Heatherton; L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; K O Fagerström
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1991-09

8.  Acute-alcohol effects on the Experiential Discounting Task (EDT) and a question-based measure of delay discounting.

Authors:  Brady Reynolds; Jerry B Richards; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 9.  The role of impulsive behavior in drug abuse.

Authors:  Jennifer L Perry; Marilyn E Carroll
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Test-retest reliability of a group-administered paper-pencil measure of delay discounting.

Authors:  Robert C Beck; Mary Frances Triplett
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.157

View more
  9 in total

1.  Differential effects of social and novelty enrichment on individual differences in impulsivity and behavioral flexibility.

Authors:  Maya Zhe Wang; Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Gamification: The Intersection between Behavior Analysis and Game Design Technologies.

Authors:  Zachary H Morford; Benjamin N Witts; Kenneth J Killingsworth; Mark P Alavosius
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2014-04-29

3.  Sensitivity to Changing Environmental Conditions across Individuals with Subtype 2 Automatically Reinforced and Socially Reinforced Self-injury.

Authors:  Griffin W Rooker; Louis P Hagopian; Jennifer N Haddock; Nabil Mezhoudi; Alexander R Arevalo
Journal:  Behav Dev Bull       Date:  2019-10

4.  Reward Contrast Effects on Impulsive Choice and Timing in Rats.

Authors:  Aaron P Smith; Jennifer R Peterson; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Timing Time Percept       Date:  2016

5.  The effects of a time-based intervention on experienced middle-aged rats.

Authors:  Jennifer R Peterson; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Mechanisms of impulsive choice: III. The role of reward processes.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Training Tolerance to Delay Using the Escalating Interest Task.

Authors:  Jillian M Rung; Michael E Young
Journal:  Psychol Rec       Date:  2014-09

8.  Learning to wait for more likely or just more: greater tolerance to delays of reward with increasingly longer delays.

Authors:  Jillian M Rung; Michael E Young
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.215

9.  Outcome probability versus magnitude: when waiting benefits one at the cost of the other.

Authors:  Michael E Young; Tara L Webb; Jillian M Rung; Anthony W McCoy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.