Literature DB >> 21228197

Aerodynamics of gliding flight in common swifts.

P Henningsson1, A Hedenström.   

Abstract

Gliding flight performance and wake topology of a common swift (Apus apus L.) were examined in a wind tunnel at speeds between 7 and 11 m s(-1). The tunnel was tilted to simulate descending flight at different sink speeds. The swift varied its wingspan, wing area and tail span over the speed range. Wingspan decreased linearly with speed, whereas tail span decreased in a nonlinear manner. For each airspeed, the minimum glide angle was found. The corresponding sink speeds showed a curvilinear relationship with airspeed, with a minimum sink speed at 8.1 m s(-1) and a speed of best glide at 9.4 m s(-1). Lift-to-drag ratio was calculated for each airspeed and tilt angle combinations and the maximum for each speed showed a curvilinear relationship with airspeed, with a maximum of 12.5 at an airspeed of 9.5 m s(-1). Wake was sampled in the transverse plane using stereo digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV). The main structures of the wake were a pair of trailing wingtip vortices and a pair of trailing tail vortices. Circulation of these was measured and a model was constructed that showed good weight support. Parasite drag was estimated from the wake defect measured in the wake behind the body. Parasite drag coefficient ranged from 0.30 to 0.22 over the range of airspeeds. Induced drag was calculated and used to estimate profile drag coefficient, which was found to be in the same range as that previously measured on a Harris' hawk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21228197     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.050609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  16 in total

1.  Span efficiency in hawkmoths.

Authors:  Per Henningsson; Richard J Bomphrey
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Relation between travel strategy and social organization of migrating birds with special consideration of formation flight in the northern bald ibis.

Authors:  B Voelkl; J Fritz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Time-resolved vortex wake of a common swift flying over a range of flight speeds.

Authors:  P Henningsson; F T Muijres; A Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Changes in kinematics and aerodynamics over a range of speeds in Tadarida brasiliensis, the Brazilian free-tailed bat.

Authors:  Tatjana Y Hubel; Nickolay I Hristov; Sharon M Swartz; Kenneth S Breuer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Gull dynamic pitch stability is controlled by wing morphing.

Authors:  Christina Harvey; Daniel J Inman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Wake structure and kinematics in two insectivorous bats.

Authors:  Tatjana Y Hubel; Nickolay I Hristov; Sharon M Swartz; Kenneth S Breuer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Avian surface reconstruction in free flight with application to flight stability analysis of a barn owl and peregrine falcon.

Authors:  Nicholas E Durston; Xue Wan; Jian G Liu; Shane P Windsor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Migration routes and strategies in a highly aerial migrant, the common swift Apus apus, revealed by light-level geolocators.

Authors:  Susanne Åkesson; Raymond Klaassen; Jan Holmgren; James W Fox; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Wake characteristics of a freely rotating bioinspired swept rotor blade.

Authors:  Asif Shahriar Nafi; Krishnamoorthy Krishnan; Anup K Debnath; Erin E Hackett; Roi Gurka
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts.

Authors:  Per Henningsson; Anders Hedenström; Richard J Bomphrey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.