Literature DB >> 17385298

A comparative confocal microscopy analysis after LASIK with the IntraLase femtosecond laser vs Hansatome microkeratome.

Manuel Ramírez1, Everardo Hernández-Quintela, Ramón Naranjo-Tackman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare confocal microscopy findings between a femtosecond laser and a mechanical microkeratome.
METHODS: Eighteen eyes of nine patients underwent LASIK. Corneal flaps were created with the femtosecond laser in the right eyes and a mechanical microkeratome in the left eyes. The corneal flap interface was analyzed in all eyes with a confocal microscope at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively.
RESULTS: All eyes showed small reflective particles at the corneal flap interface. The mean number of reflective particles was not statistically significantly different at 1 week (P = .078) and 1 month (P = .28) using a femtosecond laser and a mechanical microkeratome.
CONCLUSIONS: Confocal microscopy findings at the corneal flap interface showed a similar number of particles using both systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17385298     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20070301-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of keratocyte density after femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratome from 3 months up to 5 years after LASIK.

Authors:  Pilar Cañadas; Laura de Benito-Llopis; José Luis Hernández-Verdejo; Miguel A Teus
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  In vivo confocal microscopic evaluation of corneal wound healing after femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty.

Authors:  Roni M Shtein; Kurt H Kelley; David C Musch; Alan Sugar; Shahzad I Mian
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2012-02-16

3.  Repeatability of layered corneal pachymetry with the artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound arc-scanner.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe; Ronald H Silverman; D Jackson Coleman
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Corneal response to femtosecond laser photodisruption in the rabbit.

Authors:  Naoyuki Morishige; Anna Kesler-Diaz; Andrew J Wahlert; Ronald M Kurtz; Tibor Juhasz; Melvin Sarayba; James V Jester
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Influence of microkeratome parameters on the stromal bed and flap edge quality in laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Jens Heichel; Frank Wilhelm; Kathleen S Kunert; Rabea Schlueter; Ute Stuhltraeger; Thomas Hammer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-17

6.  Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome-assisted flap creation for LASIK: a prospective, randomized, paired-eye study.

Authors:  Bojan Pajic; Iraklis Vastardis; Brigitte Pajic-Eggspuehler; Zisis Gatzioufas; Farhad Hafezi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.