Literature DB >> 11425130

Duration discrimination and subjective duration for ramped and damped sounds.

R S Schlauch1, D T Ries, J J DiGiovanni.   

Abstract

The perception of stimuli with ramped envelopes (gradual attack and abrupt decay) and damped envelopes (abrupt attack and gradual decay) was studied in subjective and objective tasks. Magnitude estimation (ME) of perceived duration was measured for broadband noise, 1.0-kHz, and 8.0-kHz tones for durations between 10 and 200 ms. Damped sounds were judged to be shorter than ramped sounds. Matching experiments between sounds with ramped, damped, and rectangular envelopes also showed that damped sounds are perceived to be shorter than ramped sounds, and, additionally, the reason for the effect is a result of the damped sound being judged shorter than a rectangular-gated sound rather than the ramped sound being judged longer than a rectangular-gated sound. These matching studies also demonstrate that the size of the effect is larger for tones (factor of 2.0) than for broadband noise (factor of 1.5). There are two plausible explanations for the finding that damped sounds are judged to be shorter than ramped or rectangular-gated sounds: (1) the abrupt offset at a high level of the ramped sound (or a rectangular-gated sound) results in a persistence of perception (forward masking) that is considered in judgments of the subjective duration; and (2) listeners may ignore a portion of the decay of a damped sound because they consider it an "echo" [Stecker and Hafter, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 3358-3368 (2000)]. In another experiment, duration discrimination for broadband noise with ramped, damped, and rectangular envelopes was studied as a function of duration (10 to 100 ms) to determine if differences in perceived duration are associated with the size of measured Weber fractions. A forced-choice adaptive procedure was used. Duration discrimination was poorer for noise with ramped envelopes than for noise with damped or rectangular envelopes. This result is inconsistent with differences in perceived duration and no explanation was readily apparent.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11425130     DOI: 10.1121/1.1372913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  Examining auditory kappa effects through manipulating intensity differences between sequential tones.

Authors:  Doug Alards-Tomalin; Launa C Leboe-McGowan; Todd A Mondor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-27

2.  Loudness adaptation in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Sheng Liu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-20

3.  Level dominance in sound source identification.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu; Christophe Stoelinga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The role of temporal-masking patterns in the determination of subjective duration and loudness for ramped and damped sounds.

Authors:  Dennis T Ries; Robert S Schlauch; Jeffrey J DiGiovanni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sensory constraints on auditory identification of the material and geometric properties of struck bars.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Christophe N J Stoelinga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change.

Authors:  Erin S Maloff; D Wesley Grantham; Daniel H Ashmead
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Discrimination of temporally asymmetric modulation with triangular envelopes on a broadband-noise carrier (L).

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Neal F Viemeister; Mark A Stellmack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Binaural sensitivity changes between cortical on and off responses.

Authors:  Douglas E H Hartley; Johannes C Dahmen; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

Authors:  Laura Ortega; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Perceptual distortions in pitch and time reveal active prediction and support for an auditory pitch-motion hypothesis.

Authors:  Molly J Henry; J Devin McAuley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.