Literature DB >> 23652467

Comparison of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in-situ keratomileusis versus wavefront-guided laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia.

Kwanghyun Lee1, Ji Min Ahn, Eung Kweon Kim, Tae-im Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare optical quality, ocular scattering, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK).
METHODS: A total of 47 eyes from 47 participants who had undergone LASIK (group I) or LASEK (group II) procedure at least 6 months prior were enrolled. Ocular aberrations and modulation transfer function (MTF) values measured using iTrace, a ray-tracing type aberrometer, were compared to MTF (modulation transfer function) cut-off values, Strehl ratio, and objective indices of scattering obtained using the Objective Quality Analysis System II (OQAS II).
RESULTS: There was no significant correlation between the postoperative optical quality parameters and the HOAs between both groups. In group I, the MTF cut-off value was significantly correlated with cylinder refraction (p = 0.037), and the objective scattering index (OSI) was positively correlated with spherical equivalent (p = 0.023). In group II, there was a statistically significant correlation between the OSI and achieved refractive correction (p = 0.001). Regression analysis showed that the OSI was the most significant predictor of MTF cut-off values after refractive surgery. Additionally, MTF values measured by OQAS were significantly lower than those measured by iTrace without correlation.
CONCLUSION: Optical quality after refractive surgery may be influenced by not only ocular aberrations but also by scattering. Even though the accuracies of the machines used in this study to measure optical quality have yet to be proven, this study showed limited correlation among the values measured using the two different machines after refractive surgery. Therefore, for more generalized evaluation of visual function after refractive surgery, more advanced optical devices still need to be developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23652467     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2356-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  32 in total

1.  Laser Ray Tracing versus Hartmann-Shack sensor for measuring optical aberrations in the human eye.

Authors:  E Moreno-Barriuso; R Navarro
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Objective assessment of transient corneal haze and its relation to visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  C van de Pol; K Soya; D G Hwang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Effect of interaction of macroaberrations and scattered light on objective quality of vision in pseudophakic eyes with aspheric monofocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Yannick Nochez; Samuel Majzoub; Pierre-Jean Pisella
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Nayori Yamane; Kazunori Miyata; Tomokazu Samejima; Takahiro Hiraoka; Takahiro Kiuchi; Fumiki Okamoto; Yoko Hirohara; Toshifumi Mihashi; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Comparative study of stromal bed quality by using mechanical, IntraLase femtosecond laser 15- and 30-kHz microkeratomes.

Authors:  Melvin A Sarayba; Teresa S Ignacio; Perry S Binder; Dan B Tran
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Corneal haze development after PRK is regulated by volume of stromal tissue removal.

Authors:  T Møller-Pedersen; H D Cavanagh; W M Petroll; J V Jester
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Comparison of the retinal image quality with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor and a double-pass instrument.

Authors:  Fernando Díaz-Doutón; Antonio Benito; Jaume Pujol; Montserrat Arjona; José Luis Güell; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Comparison of corneal wound-healing response in photorefractive keratectomy and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.

Authors:  Salomon Esquenazi; Jiucheng He; Nicolas G Bazan; Haydee E P Bazan
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  A comparative study of post-operative pain in laser epithelial keratomileusis versus photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  T A Saleh; M A Almasri
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.392

10.  Higher order aberrations and relative risk of symptoms after LASIK.

Authors:  Munish Sharma; Brian S Boxer Wachler; Colin C K Chan
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  11 in total

1.  Comparison of optical quality after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Hong-Ting Liu; Zhou Zhou; Wu-Qiang Luo; Wen-Jing He; Owhofasa Agbedia; Jiang-Xia Wang; Jian-Zhong Huang; Xin Gao; Min Kong; Min Li; Li Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Relation of Corneal Astigmatism with Various Corneal Image Quality Parameters in a Large Cohort of Naïve Corneas.

Authors:  Mohamed Omar Yousif; Rania Serag Elkitkat; Noha Abdelsadek Alaarag; Abdelrhman Shams; Hesham Mohamed Gharieb
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-04

3.  Visual, aberrometric, photic phenomena, and patient satisfaction after myopic wavefront-guided LASIK using a high-resolution aberrometer.

Authors:  Sarah Moussa; Alois K Dexl; Eva M Krall; Eva M Arlt; Günther Grabner; Josef Ruckhofer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-12

4.  Comparison of postoperative visual quality after SMILE and LASEK for high myopia: A 1-year outcome.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhu; Leilei Zou; Manrong Yu; Chen Qiu; Minjie Chen; Jinhui Dai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Effect of the Degree of Astigmatism on Optical Quality in Children.

Authors:  Jing Gao; Xiao-Xia Wang; Lin Wang; Yuan Sun; Rui-Fen Liu; Qi Zhao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Utility of the optical quality analysis system for decision-making in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Jin Sun Hwang; Yoon Pyo Lee; Seok Hyun Bae; Ha Kyoung Kim; Kayoung Yi; Young Joo Shin
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Changes and Diurnal Variation of Visual Quality after Orthokeratology in Myopic Children.

Authors:  Hao-Chen Guo; Wan-Qing Jin; An-Peng Pan; Qin-Mei Wang; Jia Qu; A-Yong Yu
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Optical Quality and Intraocular Scattering in the Diabetic Eye without Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Jianting Liu; Xiaogang Wang; Jinfeng Wang; Haike Guo
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Effect of wavefront optimized LASIK on higher order aberrations in myopic patients.

Authors:  Muhammad Saim Khan; Sadia Humayun; Aisha Fawad; Mazhar Ishaq; Sabahat Arzoo; Fawad Mashhadi
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

10.  Correlation between RAGE gene promoter methylation and diabetic retinal inflammation.

Authors:  Shifeng Kan; Jing Wu; Chengxi Sun; Jing Hao; Zhen Wu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.