Literature DB >> 15570767

A comparative study of post-operative pain in laser epithelial keratomileusis versus photorefractive keratectomy.

T A Saleh1, M A Almasri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the level of post-operative pain associated with two methods of excimer laser corneal refractive surgery: PRK (photorefractive keratectomy) versus LASEK (laser epithelial keratomileusis).
METHODS: 14 patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral myopic PRK were included in the study. The first eye of each patient was randomly allocated for treatment by either LASEK or PRK with alcohol-assisted epithelial debridement and second eyes were treated with the other technique. Laser corneal ablation was performed with Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser by one surgeon (MAA) using the same algorithm. Post-operatively, all patients had declofenac sodium 0.1% eye drops four times a day, lorazepam 2mg at night and two solpadol (paracetamol 500mg and codeine phosphate 30mg) tablets every six hours orally for two days. Chloramphenicol 0.5% drops four times a day were also administered for seven days. The level of pain in each eye was assessed 2, 12, 24 and 48 hours following laser surgery using a descriptive pain score from 0 to 10. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t test.
RESULTS: The mean pain score at two hours post-operatively was 3.5 +/- 2.24(SD) in the LASEK group and 5.7 +/- 2.02(SD) in the PRK group. This difference is statistically significant. At 12 hours it was 4.33 +/- 2.53 (SD) and 4.75 +/- 2.30 (SD), at 24 hours it was 3.71 +/-2.84 (SD) and 4.00 +/- 2.48 (SD), and at 48 hours it was 2.86 +/- 3.43 (SD) and 2.21 +/- 2.55 (SD). There was no statistically significant difference in the pain score at these intervals.
CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative pain was less in eyes treated with LASEK than eyes treated with PRK 2 hours following laser surgery. This was statisticaly significant and there was no statistically significant difference at 12, 24 and 48 hours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15570767     DOI: 10.1016/s1479-666x(03)80022-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgeon        ISSN: 1479-666X            Impact factor:   2.392


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in-situ keratomileusis versus wavefront-guided laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia.

Authors:  Kwanghyun Lee; Ji Min Ahn; Eung Kweon Kim; Tae-im Kim
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for correction of myopia.

Authors:  Shi-Ming Li; Siyan Zhan; Si-Yuan Li; Xiao-Xia Peng; Jing Hu; Hua Andrew Law; Ning-Li Wang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-22

3.  Evaluation of analgesic efficacy of bromfenac sodium ophthalmic solution 0.09% versus ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution 0.5% following LASEK or Epi-LASIK.

Authors:  Xiao Jing Wang; Sze H Wong; Roshan Givergis; Emil W Chynn
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.