Literature DB >> 11476680

Objective assessment of transient corneal haze and its relation to visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy.

C van de Pol1, K Soya, D G Hwang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Photorefractive keratectomy has the potential to cause transient corneal haze. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between transient corneal haze as measured by an objective means and high and low contrast visual performance.
METHODS: In a prospective study, 44 eyes of 28 patients were examined preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after photorefractive keratectomy. Five laser in situ keratomileusis and two intrastromal corneal ring segments (Intacs [KeraVision, Fremont, CA]) were included for comparison, because these procedures are not expected to cause haze. Haze was measured using a prototype objective hazemeter, TSPC-3, a modification of the Nidek EAS-1000. Visual performance was measured using high-contrast visual acuity and the Rabin Small Letter Contrast Test.
RESULTS: Corneal haze was greatest at the 1-month examination and was consistent with a decrease in visual performance on both tests. Corneal haze resolved in 82% of eyes by 10 +/- 4 months after photorefractive keratectomy. However, visual performance had not returned to preoperative levels in 65% and 81% of these eyes on the high-contrast visual acuity test and the Small Letter Contrast Test, respectively. Eyes that underwent laser in situ keratomileusis and Intacs did not develop corneal haze; however, visual decrements were measured.
CONCLUSIONS: As a clinical tool, the TSPC-3 hazemeter objectively measures very subtle changes in haze levels. Corneal haze appears to account for only approximately 50% of visual performance changes in the early healing period after photorefractive keratectomy. Other factors, namely topographic abnormalities, are more likely to be an important cause of persistent visual disturbances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11476680     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01003-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  8 in total

1.  Biosynthetic corneal substitute implantation in dogs.

Authors:  Ellison Bentley; Christopher J Murphy; Fengfu Li; David J Carlsson; May Griffith
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Comparison of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in-situ keratomileusis versus wavefront-guided laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia.

Authors:  Kwanghyun Lee; Ji Min Ahn; Eung Kweon Kim; Tae-im Kim
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Comparison of optical quality after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Hong-Ting Liu; Zhou Zhou; Wu-Qiang Luo; Wen-Jing He; Owhofasa Agbedia; Jiang-Xia Wang; Jian-Zhong Huang; Xin Gao; Min Kong; Min Li; Li Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Photorefractive keratectomy for anisometropic amblyopia in children.

Authors:  Evelyn A Paysse
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

5.  Changes in contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher order aberration by conventional myopic photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Norishige Sakata; Tadatoshi Tokunaga; Kazunori Miyata; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Correlation between practice location as a surrogate for UV exposure and practice patterns to prevent corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

Authors:  Eman M Al-Sharif; Donald U Stone
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-10

7.  Quantitative measures of corneal transparency, derived from objective analysis of depth-resolved corneal images, demonstrated with full-field optical coherence tomographic microscopy.

Authors:  Romain Bocheux; Pascal Pernot; Vincent Borderie; Karsten Plamann; Kristina Irsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Measuring Corneal Haze by Using Scheimpflug Photography and Confocal Microscopy.

Authors:  Jay W McLaren; Katrin Wacker; Katrina M Kane; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.