Literature DB >> 23651882

How good is the neurophysiology of pain questionnaire? A Rasch analysis of psychometric properties.

Mark J Catley1, Neil E O'Connell, G Lorimer Moseley.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) was devised to assess how an individual conceptualizes the biological mechanisms that underpin his or her pain. Despite its widespread use, its psychometric properties have not been comprehensively interrogated. Rasch analysis was undertaken on NPQ data from a convenience sample of 300 spinal pain patients, and test-retest reliability was assessed in a sample of 45 low back pain patients. The NPQ effectively targeted the ability of the sample and had acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability. However, some items functioned erratically for persons of differing abilities or were psychometrically redundant. The NPQ was reanalyzed with 7 questionable items excluded, and superior psychometric properties were observed. These findings suggest that the NPQ could be improved, but future prospective studies including qualitative measures are needed. In summary, the NPQ is a useful tool for assessing a patient's conceptualization of the biological mechanisms that underpin his or her pain and for evaluating the effects of cognitive interventions in clinical practice and research. These findings suggest that it has adequate psychometric properties for use with chronic spinal pain patients. PERSPECTIVE: Rasch analysis was used to analyze the NPQ. Despite several limitations, these results suggest that it is a useful tool with which to assess a patient's conceptualization of the biological mechanisms that underpin his or her pain and to evaluate the effects of cognitive interventions in clinical practice and research.
Copyright © 2013 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; neurophysiology; pain education; pain knowledge; pain reconceptualization

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23651882     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  36 in total

1.  Understanding Physiotherapists' Intention to Counsel Clients with Chronic Pain on Exercise: A Focus on Psychosocial Factors.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Blouin; Miranda A Cary; Mackenzie G Marchant; Nancy C Gyurcsik; Danielle R Brittain; Jenelle Zapski
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Immediate effect of pain neuroscience education for recent onset low back pain: an exploratory single arm trial.

Authors:  Adriaan Louw; Kevin Farrell; Breanna Choffin; Brooke Foster; Grace Lunde; Michelle Snodgrass; Robert Sweet; Matthew Weitzel; Rebecca Wilder; Emilio J Puentedura
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-06-04

3.  Effectiveness of Educating Health Care Professionals in Managing Chronic Pain Patients Through a Supervised Student Inter-professional Pain Clinic.

Authors:  Ling Cao; Stephen Z Hull
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-01-13

4.  A protocol for a randomized trial on pain neuroscience education vs. routine physical therapy in people with chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Farzaneh Soleiman; Hosein Kouhzad Mohamadi; Maryam Saadat; Fateme Derisfard; Gholamhossein Nassadj
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2022-07-14

5.  The sensory and affective components of pain: are they differentially modifiable dimensions or inseparable aspects of a unitary experience? A systematic review.

Authors:  K Talbot; V J Madden; S L Jones; G L Moseley
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  An abbreviated therapeutic neuroscience education session improves pain knowledge in first-year physical therapy students but does not change attitudes or beliefs.

Authors:  Terry Cox; Adriaan Louw; Emilio J Puentedura
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-02-10

7.  Pain knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of doctor of physical therapy students: changes across the curriculum and the role of an elective pain science course.

Authors:  Craig A Wassinger
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-02-01

8.  Assessment Tools of Patient Competences: The Spanish Version of the R-NPQ and Three Practical Cases in Women with Breast Cancer and Persistent Pain.

Authors:  María Torres-Lacomba; Beatriz Navarro-Brazález; Javier Bailón-Cerezo; Fernando Vergara-Pérez; Irene de la Rosa-Díaz; Virginia Prieto-Gómez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Do Parental Pain Knowledge, Catastrophizing, and Hypervigilance Improve Following Pain Neuroscience Education in Healthy Children?

Authors:  Pere Bacardit Pintó; Kelly Ickmans; Emma Rheel; Margot Iwens; Mira Meeus; Jo Nijs; Roselien Pas
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20

10.  Effectiveness of training physical therapists in pain neuroscience education for patients with chronic spine pain: a cluster-randomized trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lane; John S Magel; Anne Thackeray; Tom Greene; Nora F Fino; Emilio J Puentedura; Adriaan Louw; Daniel Maddox; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 7.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.