Literature DB >> 34354017

Effectiveness of training physical therapists in pain neuroscience education for patients with chronic spine pain: a cluster-randomized trial.

Elizabeth Lane1, John S Magel1, Anne Thackeray1, Tom Greene2,3, Nora F Fino4, Emilio J Puentedura5, Adriaan Louw6, Daniel Maddox7, Julie M Fritz1,8.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Chronic spinal pain poses complex challenges for health care around the world and is in need of effective interventions. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is a promising intervention hypothesized to improve pain and disability by changing individuals' beliefs, perceptions, and expectations about pain. Pain neuroscience education has shown promise in small, controlled trials when implemented in tightly controlled situations. Exploration of promising interventions through more pragmatic methodologies is a crucial but understudied step towards improving outcomes in routine clinical care. The purpose was to examine the impact of pragmatic PNE training on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic spine pain. The cluster-randomized clinical trial took place in 45 outpatient physical therapist (PT) clinics. Participants included 108 physical therapists (45 clinics and 16 clusters) and 319 patients. Clusters of PT clinics were randomly assigned to either receive training in PNE or no intervention and continue with usual care (UC). We found no significant differences between groups for our primary outcome at 12 weeks, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function computer adaptive test {mean difference = 1.05 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.73 to 2.83), P = 0.25}. The PNE group demonstrated significant greater improvements in pain self-efficacy at 12 and 2 weeks compared with no intervention (mean difference = 3.65 [95% CI: 0.00-7.29], P = 0.049 and = 3.08 [95% CI: 0.07 to -6.09], P = 0.045, respectively). However, a similar percentage of participants in both control (41.1%) and treatment (44.4%) groups reported having received the treatment per fidelity question (yes or no to pain discussed as a perceived threat) at 2 weeks. Pragmatic PT PNE training and delivery failed to produce significant functional changes in patients with chronic spinal pain but did produce significant improvement in pain self-efficacy over UC PT.
Copyright © 2022 International Association for the Study of Pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34354017      PMCID: PMC8816964          DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   7.926


  59 in total

1.  The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: a field experiment in an institutional setting.

Authors:  E J Langer; J Rodin
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1976-08

2.  Comparison of intraclass correlation coefficient estimates and standard errors between using cross-sectional and repeated measurement data: the Safety Check cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Edward H Ip; Richard Wasserman; Shari Barkin
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Why patients visit their doctors: assessing the most prevalent conditions in a defined American population.

Authors:  Jennifer L St Sauver; David O Warner; Barbara P Yawn; Debra J Jacobson; Michaela E McGree; Joshua J Pankratz; L Joseph Melton; Véronique L Roger; Jon O Ebbert; Walter A Rocca
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 4.  The support of autonomy and the control of behavior.

Authors:  E L Deci; R M Ryan
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-12

5.  Pain physiology education improves pain beliefs in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome compared with pacing and self-management education: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mira Meeus; Jo Nijs; Jessica Van Oosterwijck; Veerle Van Alsenoy; Steven Truijen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Samuel F Dworkin; Dagmar Amtmann; Gunnar Andersson; David Borenstein; Eugene Carragee; John Carrino; Roger Chou; Karon Cook; Anthony DeLitto; Christine Goertz; Partap Khalsa; John Loeser; Sean Mackey; James Panagis; James Rainville; Tor Tosteson; Dennis Turk; Michael Von Korff; Debra K Weiner
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.750

7.  Manual Therapy, Therapeutic Patient Education, and Therapeutic Exercise, an Effective Multimodal Treatment of Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hector Beltran-Alacreu; Ibai López-de-Uralde-Villanueva; Josué Fernández-Carnero; Roy La Touche
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.159

8.  A prognostic approach to defining chronic pain: replication in a UK primary care low back pain population.

Authors:  Kate M Dunn; Peter R Croft; Chris J Main; Michael Von Korff
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Health care providers' attitudes and beliefs towards common low back pain: factor structure and psychometric properties of the HC-PAIRS.

Authors:  Ruud M A Houben; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Madelon Peters; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Pieter M J C Wolters; Suzanne G M Stomp-van den Berg
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.442

10.  Correlation of PROMIS Physical Function and Pain CAT Instruments With Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index in Spine Patients.

Authors:  Mark O Papuga; Addisu Mesfin; Robert Molinari; Paul T Rubery
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.