Craig A Wassinger1. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Abstract
Introduction: Entry-level physical therapist education on pain has been described as lacking. Calls have been made to include pain science courses to address this knowledge gap. Methods: Physical therapist students' pain knowledge and attitudes were measured using the revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (rNPQ) and Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physical Therapists (PABS-PT), respectively. Univariate ANOVAs, with post hoc pairwise comparison and effect sizes, were used to measure these aspects over time. Results: Pain knowledge and clinician beliefs were significantly different (p < 0.001) at various curricular timepoints. rNPQ scores increased from 1st to 2nd year (effect size: 1.10), remained similar between years 2 and 3, and improved following the pain course (effect size: 1.25). Biomedical beliefs were similar during years 1, 2 and 3, and declined following the pain course (effect size: 1.56). Conversely, psychosocial belief scores increased from 1st to 2nd year (effect size: 0.82), remained similar between years 2 and 3, and increased following the pain course (effect size: 1.08).Discussion/Conclusions: Physical therapist education, without a dedicated pain science course, may be insufficiently preparing students to treat patients in pain. Educators should consider adopting a dedicated pain science course or substantially bolstering embedded curricular pain content to promote best practice in pain treatment.
Introduction: Entry-level physical therapist education on pain has been described as lacking. Calls have been made to include pain science courses to address this knowledge gap. Methods: Physical therapist students' pain knowledge and attitudes were measured using the revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (rNPQ) and Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physical Therapists (PABS-PT), respectively. Univariate ANOVAs, with post hoc pairwise comparison and effect sizes, were used to measure these aspects over time. Results: Pain knowledge and clinician beliefs were significantly different (p < 0.001) at various curricular timepoints. rNPQ scores increased from 1st to 2nd year (effect size: 1.10), remained similar between years 2 and 3, and improved following the pain course (effect size: 1.25). Biomedical beliefs were similar during years 1, 2 and 3, and declined following the pain course (effect size: 1.56). Conversely, psychosocial belief scores increased from 1st to 2nd year (effect size: 0.82), remained similar between years 2 and 3, and increased following the pain course (effect size: 1.08).Discussion/Conclusions: Physical therapist education, without a dedicated pain science course, may be insufficiently preparing students to treat patients in pain. Educators should consider adopting a dedicated pain science course or substantially bolstering embedded curricular pain content to promote best practice in pain treatment.
Entities:
Keywords:
Pain science; curriculum; neurophysiology of pain questionnaire; pain beliefs and attitudes; physical therapist education
Authors: Ruud M A Houben; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Pieter M J C Wolters; Madelon Peters; Suzanne G M Stomp-van den Berg Journal: Eur J Pain Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.931
Authors: Ellyn Arwood; Joanna M Rowe; Naileshni S Singh; Daniel B Carr; Keela A Herr; Roger Chou Journal: Pain Med Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Ardith Z Doorenbos; Deborah B Gordon; David Tauben; Jenny Palisoc; Mark Drangsholt; Taryn Lindhorst; Jennifer Danielson; June Spector; Ruth Ballweg; Linda Vorvick; John D Loeser Journal: J Pain Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 5.820