Literature DB >> 23651674

Short-latency artifacts associated with concurrent TMS-EEG.

Nigel C Rogasch1, Richard H Thomson, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Paul B Fitzgerald.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) is an emerging method for studying cortical network properties. However, various artifacts affect measurement of TMS-evoked cortical potentials (TEPs), especially within 30 ms of stimulation. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to assess the origin and recovery of short-latency TMS-EEG artifacts (<30 ms) using different stimulators and under different experimental conditions.
METHODS: EEG was recorded during TMS delivered to a phantom head (melon) and 12 healthy volunteers with different TMS machines, at different scalp positions, at different TMS intensities, and following paired-pulse TMS. Recovery from the TMS artifact and other short-latency artifacts were compared between conditions.
RESULTS: Following phantom stimulation, the artifact resulting from different TMS machines (Magstim 200, Magventure MagPro R30 and X100) and pulse shapes (monophasic and biphasic) resulted in different artifact profiles. After accounting for differences between machines, TMS artifacts recovered within ∼12 ms. This was replicated in human participants, however a large secondary artifact (peaks at 5 and 10 ms) became prominent following stimulation over lateral scalp positions, which only recovered after ∼25-40 ms. Increasing TMS intensity increased secondary artifact amplitude over both motor and prefrontal cortex. There was no consistent modulation of the secondary artifact following inhibitory paired-pulse TMS (interstimulus interval = 100 ms) over motor cortex.
CONCLUSIONS: The secondary artifact observed in humans is consistent with activation of scalp muscles following TMS. TEPs can be recorded within a short period of time (10-12 ms) following TMS, however measures must be taken to avoid muscle stimulation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifact; Electroencephalography; Muscle; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23651674     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  16 in total

1.  Pharmacological mechanisms of interhemispheric signal propagation: a TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Jeanette Hui; Reza Zomorrodi; Pantelis Lioumis; Bahar Salavati; Tarek K Rajji; Robert Chen; Daniel M Blumberger; Zafiris J Daskalakis
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Impact of different intensities of intermittent theta burst stimulation on the cortical properties during TMS-EEG and working memory performance.

Authors:  Sung Wook Chung; Nigel C Rogasch; Kate E Hoy; Caley M Sullivan; Robin F H Cash; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  ARTIST: A fully automated artifact rejection algorithm for single-pulse TMS-EEG data.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Corey J Keller; Nigel C Rogasch; Parker Longwell; Emmanuel Shpigel; Camarin E Rolle; Amit Etkin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Central nervous system physiology.

Authors:  John Rothwell; Andrea Antal; David Burke; Antony Carlsen; Dejan Georgiev; Marjan Jahanshahi; Dagmar Sternad; Josep Valls-Solé; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  The effects of individualised intermittent theta burst stimulation in the prefrontal cortex: A TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Sung Wook Chung; Caley M Sullivan; Nigel C Rogasch; Kate E Hoy; Neil W Bailey; Robin F H Cash; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Transcranial Evoked Potentials Can Be Reliably Recorded with Active Electrodes.

Authors:  Marco Mancuso; Valerio Sveva; Alessandro Cruciani; Katlyn Brown; Jaime Ibáñez; Vishal Rawji; Elias Casula; Isabella Premoli; Sasha D'Ambrosio; John Rothwell; Lorenzo Rocchi
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-22

7.  Synchronizing the transcranial magnetic pulse with electroencephalographic recordings effectively reduces inter-trial variability of the pulse artefact.

Authors:  Leo Tomasevic; Mitsuaki Takemi; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Variability and Predictors of Response to Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation: A TMS-EEG Study.

Authors:  Lorenzo Rocchi; Jaime Ibáñez; Alberto Benussi; Ricci Hannah; Vishal Rawji; Elias Casula; John Rothwell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  MEP Latencies Predict the Neuromodulatory Effect of cTBS Delivered to the Ipsilateral and Contralateral Sensorimotor Cortex.

Authors:  Gan Huang; André Mouraux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces oscillatory power changes in chronic tinnitus.

Authors:  Martin Schecklmann; Astrid Lehner; Judith Gollmitzer; Eldrid Schmidt; Winfried Schlee; Berthold Langguth
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.