BACKGROUND: Clinical practice has suggested that, in severely obese patients seeking bariatric surgery, clinical conditions, behavioural characteristics and psychological status might all differ from those of their counterparts starting conventional conservative therapy. METHODS: Two groups of obese patients with closely similar body mass values were considered. The first group included individuals voluntarily and spontaneously seeking biliopancreatic diversion and the second group comprised patients at the beginning of a weight loss programme. After anthropometric and metabolic evaluation, the patients underwent an alimentary interview; eating behaviour and psychological status were assessed by Three Factor Eating Questionnaire and by Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS). RESULTS: Among bariatric candidates, a greater number of individuals with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidaemia and high tendency to disinhibition and susceptibility to hunger scores was observed, whereas the other aspects of eating pattern were essentially similar. In the two groups, no difference in TAS score and or number of patients with alexithymic traits was observed. Finally, a logistic regression model showed that only age and metabolic derangement predicted the bariatric option, whereas eating behaviour or psychological status did not influence individual therapeutic choice. CONCLUSIONS: Independently of the degree of obesity, bariatric surgery was requested by the more metabolically deranged patients, whereas, in the surgical candidates, the eating pattern and psychological conditions were very similar to those of obese persons at the beginning of a conservative weight loss programme. These results suggest a highly realistic and practical attitude in severely obese patients towards obesity and bariatric surgery.
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice has suggested that, in severely obesepatients seeking bariatric surgery, clinical conditions, behavioural characteristics and psychological status might all differ from those of their counterparts starting conventional conservative therapy. METHODS: Two groups of obesepatients with closely similar body mass values were considered. The first group included individuals voluntarily and spontaneously seeking biliopancreatic diversion and the second group comprised patients at the beginning of a weight loss programme. After anthropometric and metabolic evaluation, the patients underwent an alimentary interview; eating behaviour and psychological status were assessed by Three Factor Eating Questionnaire and by Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS). RESULTS: Among bariatric candidates, a greater number of individuals with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidaemia and high tendency to disinhibition and susceptibility to hunger scores was observed, whereas the other aspects of eating pattern were essentially similar. In the two groups, no difference in TAS score and or number of patients with alexithymic traits was observed. Finally, a logistic regression model showed that only age and metabolic derangement predicted the bariatric option, whereas eating behaviour or psychological status did not influence individual therapeutic choice. CONCLUSIONS: Independently of the degree of obesity, bariatric surgery was requested by the more metabolically deranged patients, whereas, in the surgical candidates, the eating pattern and psychological conditions were very similar to those of obesepersons at the beginning of a conservative weight loss programme. These results suggest a highly realistic and practical attitude in severely obesepatients towards obesity and bariatric surgery.
Authors: Nina Crowley; Alok Madan; Sharlene Wedin; Jennifer A Correll; Laura M Delustro; Jeffery J Borckardt; T Karl Byrne Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Lance E Davidson; Ted D Adams; Jaewhan Kim; Jessica L Jones; Mia Hashibe; David Taylor; Tapan Mehta; Rodrick McKinlay; Steven C Simper; Sherman C Smith; Steven C Hunt Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Lauren E Bradley; Evan M Forman; Stephanie G Kerrigan; Meghan L Butryn; James D Herbert; David B Sarwer Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Lars Fischer; Anna-Laura Wekerle; Johannes Sander; Felix Nickel; Adrian T Billeter; Ulrike Zech; Thomas Bruckner; Beat P Müller-Stich Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Anne Ahnis; Andrea Figura; Tobias Hofmann; Andreas Stengel; Ulf Elbelt; Burghard F Klapp Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ingela Lundin Kvalem; Irmelin Bergh; Tilmann von Soest; Jan H Rosenvinge; Tina Avantis Johnsen; Egil W Martinsen; Tom Mala; Jon A Kristinsson Journal: BMC Obes Date: 2016-02-05