Lauren E Bradley1, Evan M Forman2, Stephanie G Kerrigan2, Meghan L Butryn2, James D Herbert2, David B Sarwer3. 1. Department of Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA. laur.bradley@gmail.com. 2. Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Center for Obesity Research and Education, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tens of thousands of bariatric surgery patients each year experience sub-optimal weight loss, significant regain, or both. Weight regain can contribute to a worsening of weight-related co-morbidities, and for some, leads to secondary surgical procedures. Poor weight outcomes have been associated with decreased compliance to the recommended postoperative diet. Decreased compliance may be partially due to a lack of psychological skills necessary to engage in healthy eating behaviors over the long term, especially as the effects of surgery (on appetite, hunger, and desire for food) decrease. Many behavioral interventions do not sufficiently address these challenges and often have limited effectiveness. The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of a novel 10-week acceptance-based behavioral intervention to stop postoperative weight regain. METHODS: A sample of bariatric surgery patients (n = 11) who regained at least 10 % of their maximum lost postoperative weight was recruited. All participants received the intervention, which emphasized psychological skills thought to be integral to successful weight control post-surgery. RESULTS: The intervention was shown to be feasible and acceptable, with 72 % retention and high mean rating (4.25 out of 5.00) of program satisfaction among completers. Weight regain was stopped, and even reversed, with a mean total body weight loss of 3.58 ± 3.02 % throughout the 10-week intervention. There were also significant improvements in eating-related and acceptance-related variables. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide initial support for the use of a psychological acceptance-based intervention for weight regain in bariatric surgery patients.
BACKGROUND: Tens of thousands of bariatric surgery patients each year experience sub-optimal weight loss, significant regain, or both. Weight regain can contribute to a worsening of weight-related co-morbidities, and for some, leads to secondary surgical procedures. Poor weight outcomes have been associated with decreased compliance to the recommended postoperative diet. Decreased compliance may be partially due to a lack of psychological skills necessary to engage in healthy eating behaviors over the long term, especially as the effects of surgery (on appetite, hunger, and desire for food) decrease. Many behavioral interventions do not sufficiently address these challenges and often have limited effectiveness. The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of a novel 10-week acceptance-based behavioral intervention to stop postoperative weight regain. METHODS: A sample of bariatric surgery patients (n = 11) who regained at least 10 % of their maximum lost postoperative weight was recruited. All participants received the intervention, which emphasized psychological skills thought to be integral to successful weight control post-surgery. RESULTS: The intervention was shown to be feasible and acceptable, with 72 % retention and high mean rating (4.25 out of 5.00) of program satisfaction among completers. Weight regain was stopped, and even reversed, with a mean total body weight loss of 3.58 ± 3.02 % throughout the 10-week intervention. There were also significant improvements in eating-related and acceptance-related variables. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide initial support for the use of a psychological acceptance-based intervention for weight regain in bariatric surgery patients.
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Markku Peltonen; Jarl Torgerson; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Bo Larsson; Kristina Narbro; Carl David Sjöström; Marianne Sullivan; Hans Wedel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-12-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Evan M Forman; Kimberly L Hoffman; Kathleen B McGrath; James D Herbert; Lynn L Brandsma; Michael R Lowe Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2007-04-18
Authors: Melinda A Maggard; Lisa R Shugarman; Marika Suttorp; Margaret Maglione; Harvey J Sugerman; Harvey J Sugarman; Edward H Livingston; Ninh T Nguyen; Zhaoping Li; Walter A Mojica; Lara Hilton; Shannon Rhodes; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2005-04-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Melissa A Kalarchian; Marsha D Marcus; G Terence Wilson; Erich W Labouvie; Robert E Brolin; Lisa B LaMarca Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Jeffrey I Mechanick; Adrienne Youdim; Daniel B Jones; W Timothy Garvey; Daniel L Hurley; M Molly McMahon; Leslie J Heinberg; Robert Kushner; Ted D Adams; Scott Shikora; John B Dixon; Stacy Brethauer Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Jacqueline Odom; Kerstyn C Zalesin; Tamika L Washington; Wendy W Miller; Basil Hakmeh; Danielle L Zaremba; Mohamed Altattan; Mamtha Balasubramaniam; Deborah S Gibbs; Kevin R Krause; David L Chengelis; Barry A Franklin; Peter A McCullough Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2009-06-25 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Maria Paula Carlin Cambi; Giorgio Alfredo Pedroso Baretta; Daniéla De Oliveira Magro; Cesar Luiz Boguszewski; Igor Braga Ribeiro; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-01-03 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Lauren E Bradley; Evan M Forman; Stephanie G Kerrigan; Stephanie P Goldstein; Meghan L Butryn; J Graham Thomas; James D Herbert; David B Sarwer Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Saketh R Velapati; Meera Shah; Aravind R Kuchkuntla; Barham Abu-Dayyeh; Karen Grothe; Ryan T Hurt; Manpreet S Mundi Journal: Curr Nutr Rep Date: 2018-12
Authors: Vera Voorwinde; Ingrid H M Steenhuis; Ignace M C Janssen; Valerie M Monpellier; Maartje M van Stralen Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 4.129