Literature DB >> 23650257

Standard fluorescent imaging of live cells is highly genotoxic.

Jing Ge1, David K Wood, David M Weingeist, Somsak Prasongtanakij, Panida Navasumrit, Mathuros Ruchirawat, Bevin P Engelward.   

Abstract

Fluorescence microscopy is commonly used for imaging live mammalian cells. Here, we describe studies aimed at revealing the potential genotoxic effects of standard fluorescence microscopy. To assess DNA damage, a high throughput platform for single cell gel electrophoresis is used (e.g., the CometChip). Light emitted by three standard filters was studied: (a) violet light [340-380 nm], used to excite DAPI and other blue fluorophores, (b) blue light [460-500 nm] commonly used to image green fluorescent protein (GFP) and Calcein AM, and (c) green light [528-553 nm], useful for imaging red fluorophores. Results show that exposure of samples to light during imaging is indeed genotoxic even when the selected wavelengths are outside the range known to induce significant damage levels. Shorter excitation wavelengths and longer irradiation times lead to higher levels of DNA damage. We have also measured DNA damage in cells expressing enhanced GFP or stained with Calcein AM, a widely used green fluorophore. Data show that Calcein AM leads to a synergistic increase in the levels of DNA damage and that even cells that are not being directly imaged sustain significant DNA damage from exposure to indirect light. The nature of light-induced DNA damage during imaging was assessed using the Fpg glycosylase, an enzyme that enables quantification of oxidative DNA damage. Oxidative damage was evident in cells exposed to violet light. Furthermore, the Fpg glycosylase revealed the presence of oxidative DNA damage in blue-light exposed cells for which DNA damage was not detected using standard analysis conditions. Taken together, the results of these studies call attention to the potential confounding effects of DNA damage induced by standard imaging conditions, and identify wavelength, exposure time, and fluorophore as parameters that can be modulated to reduce light-induced DNA damage.
Copyright © 2013 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23650257      PMCID: PMC3677558          DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.22291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  56 in total

1.  Phototoxicity of the fluorescent membrane dyes PKH2 and PKH26 on the human hematopoietic KG1a progenitor cell line.

Authors:  D J Oh; G M Lee; K Francis; B O Palsson
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1999-08-01

2.  Attempted base excision repair of ionizing radiation damage in human lymphoblastoid cells produces lethal and mutagenic double strand breaks.

Authors:  Ning Yang; Heather Galick; Susan S Wallace
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004-10-05

3.  Single cell trapping and DNA damage analysis using microwell arrays.

Authors:  David K Wood; David M Weingeist; Sangeeta N Bhatia; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Green fluorescent protein reporter system with transcriptional sequence heterogeneity for monitoring the interferon response.

Authors:  Linah Mahmoud; Maher Al-Saif; Haitham M Amer; Mustafa Sheikh; Fahad N Almajhdi; Khalid S A Khabar
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Microbial growth studies in biodiesel blends.

Authors:  Gitte Sørensen; Dennis V Pedersen; Anna K Nørgaard; Ketil B Sørensen; Sune D Nygaard
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2011-02-13       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 6.  Effects of UV radiation of cells.

Authors:  J Moan; M J Peak
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 6.252

Review 7.  Distribution and repair of photolesions in DNA: genetic consequences and the role of sequence context.

Authors:  E Sage
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.421

8.  Wavelength dependence of oxidative DNA damage induced by UV and visible light.

Authors:  C Kielbassa; L Roza; B Epe
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual mammalian cells.

Authors:  O Ostling; K J Johanson
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1984-08-30       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 10.  The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations.

Authors:  Andrew R Collins
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.860

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial blue light inactivation of pathogenic microbes: State of the art.

Authors:  Yucheng Wang; Ying Wang; Yuguang Wang; Clinton K Murray; Michael R Hamblin; David C Hooper; Tianhong Dai
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 18.500

2.  Fluorescent indicators for simultaneous reporting of all four cell cycle phases.

Authors:  Bryce T Bajar; Amy J Lam; Ryan K Badiee; Young-Hee Oh; Jun Chu; Xin X Zhou; Namdoo Kim; Benjamin B Kim; Mingyu Chung; Arielle L Yablonovitch; Barney F Cruz; Kanokwan Kulalert; Jacqueline J Tao; Tobias Meyer; Xiao-Dong Su; Michael Z Lin
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Micropatterned comet assay enables high throughput and sensitive DNA damage quantification.

Authors:  Jing Ge; Danielle N Chow; Jessica L Fessler; David M Weingeist; David K Wood; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Probing bacterial cell biology using image cytometry.

Authors:  Julie A Cass; Stella Stylianidou; Nathan J Kuwada; Beth Traxler; Paul A Wiggins
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 5.  Emerging metrology for high-throughput nanomaterial genotoxicology.

Authors:  Bryant C Nelson; Christa W Wright; Yuko Ibuki; Maria Moreno-Villanueva; Hanna L Karlsson; Giel Hendriks; Christopher M Sims; Neenu Singh; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 6.  Applications of CometChip for Environmental Health Studies.

Authors:  Christy Chao; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.739

7.  NF-κB oscillations translate into functionally related patterns of gene expression.

Authors:  Samuel Zambrano; Ilario De Toma; Arianna Piffer; Marco E Bianchi; Alessandra Agresti
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Sensitive CometChip assay for screening potentially carcinogenic DNA adducts by trapping DNA repair intermediates.

Authors:  Le P Ngo; Norah A Owiti; Carol Swartz; John Winters; Yang Su; Jing Ge; Aoli Xiong; Jongyoon Han; Leslie Recio; Leona D Samson; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  SpheroidChip: Patterned Agarose Microwell Compartments Harboring HepG2 Spheroids are Compatible with Genotoxicity Testing.

Authors:  Christy Chao; P Ngo Le; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2020-03-02

Review 10.  Between life and death: strategies to reduce phototoxicity in super-resolution microscopy.

Authors:  Kalina L Tosheva; Yue Yuan; Pedro Matos Pereira; Siân Culley; Ricardo Henriques
Journal:  J Phys D Appl Phys       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.