Literature DB >> 21939799

Clinical results of trochanteric fractures treated with the TARGON® proximal femur intramedullary nailing fixation system.

Yosuke Kawatani1, Kimiaki Nishida, Yoshihisa Anraku, Katsuhiko Kunitake, Yasujiro Tsutsumi.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of 352 (71 males) patients with trochanteric fractures that were treated with the TARGON® PF nail. The mean age was 83 years. According to the Jensen classification, there were 35 cases in type 1,94 cases in type 2,75 in type 3,63 in type 4 and 85 in type 5. Postoperative all patients were allowed to fully weight bear from the first postoperative day. Clinical and radiological data were collected at regular time intervals. The average waiting time to surgical reconstruction for the 352 cases was 3.5 days (1-7). The mean length of hospital stay was 14 days (5-22). The operative times ranged from 11 to 125 minutes with an average time of 32 minutes. Fifty percent of the patients regained their mobility to their pre-injury level at the final follow up. Out of 310 patients (88%) who were available for radiographie assessment, all fractures united except one case. 300 (85%) of the lag screws were placed in the inferior area in the anteroposterior view and in the central area in the lateral view (IM), which is regarded as the optimal position. The lag screws back-slided between 0 and 19 mms with an average of 6 mm. Sliding distance of the lag screw for over 10 mm was seen in 42 cases (13%). Varus collapse of the femoral head-and-neck greater than 10° was observed in 6 cases. Postoperative complications developed in 6 cases (1.7%), including wound infection in two cases, and secondary fracture at the subtrochanteric region, nonunion, back-out of the guiding sleeve and medial perforation of the lag screw, each in one case. The presented case series indicates that the TARGON® PF system is an effective and safe internal fixation device for trochanteric proximal femoral fractures. Further, prospective comparative evidence regarding the use of this system is needed to analyse and validate the presented clinical impression of our centre.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21939799     DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(11)70008-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  6 in total

1.  A novel technique for the fixation of inter-trochantieric hip fractures: A telescoping lag screw.

Authors:  Devin M Jagow; Shahan V Yacoubian; Edward J McCrink; Stephan V Yacoubian
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-08

2.  How to prevent cut-out and cut-through in biaxial proximal femoral nails: is there anything beyond lag screw positioning and tip-apex distance?

Authors:  Birgit Zirngibl; Roland Biber; Hermann Josef Bail
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Extramedullary Versus Intramedullary Reduction in Unstable Femoral Trochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Tadashi Kawamura; Hiroaki Minehara; Ryo Tazawa; Terumasa Matsuura; Rina Sakai; Masashi Takaso
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-25

4.  Analysis of using antirotational device on cephalomedullary nail for proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Marcelo Itiro Takano; Ramon Candeloro Pedroso de Moraes; Luis Gustavo Morato Pinto de Almeida; Roberto Dantas Queiroz
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2014-01-23

5.  Minimally invasive treatment of trochanteric fractures with intramedullary nails. Technique and results.

Authors:  Adrian Todor; Adina Pojar; Dan Lucaciu
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2013-02-04

6.  Comparison of Post-Operative Muscular Strength Between Gamma Nailing and Hemiarthroplasty System in Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Mitsuaki Noda; Yasuhiro Saegusa; Masayasu Takahashi; Chisa Noguchi; Chihiro Yoshikawa; Hiroshi Mikami; Akira Gotouda
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-03-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.