Literature DB >> 23649127

Reducing sequence artifacts in amplicon-based massively parallel sequencing of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded DNA by enzymatic depletion of uracil-containing templates.

Hongdo Do1, Stephen Q Wong, Jason Li, Alexander Dobrovic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are routinely used for detecting mutational biomarkers in patients with cancer. A previous intractable challenge with FFPE DNA in genetic testing has been the high number of artifactual single-nucleotide changes (SNCs), particularly for the detection of low-level mutations. Pretreatment of FFPE DNA with uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) can markedly reduce these C:G>T:A SNCs with a small panel of amplicons. This procedure has implications for massively parallel sequencing approaches to mutation detection from DNA. We investigated whether sequence artifacts were problematic in amplicon-based massively parallel sequencing and what effect UDG pretreatment had on reducing these artifacts.
METHODS: We amplified selected amplicons from lung cancer FFPE DNAs using the TruSeq Cancer Panel. SNCs occurring at a frequency <10% were considered most likely to represent sequence artifacts and were enumerated for both UDG-treated and -untreated DNAs.
RESULTS: Massively parallel sequencing of FFPE DNA samples showed multiple SNCs, predominantly C:G>T:A changes, with a significant proportion occurring above the background sequencing error (defined as 1%). UDG pretreatment markedly reduced C:G>T:A SNCs without affecting the detection of true somatic mutations. However, C:G>T:A changes within CpG dinucleotides were often resistant to the UDG treatment as a consequence of 5-methyl cytosine being deaminated to thymine rather than uracil.
CONCLUSIONS: UDG pretreatment greatly facilitates the accurate discrimination of mutations in FFPE samples by use of amplicon-based approaches. This is particularly important when working with samples with low tumor purity or for the assessment of mutational heterogeneity in tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23649127     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.202390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  55 in total

1.  Clinical applicability and cost of a 46-gene panel for genomic analysis of solid tumours: Retrospective validation and prospective audit in the UK National Health Service.

Authors:  Angela Hamblin; Sarah Wordsworth; Jilles M Fermont; Suzanne Page; Kulvinder Kaur; Carme Camps; Pamela Kaisaki; Avinash Gupta; Denis Talbot; Mark Middleton; Shirley Henderson; Anthony Cutts; Dimitrios V Vavoulis; Nick Housby; Ian Tomlinson; Jenny C Taylor; Anna Schuh
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 11.069

2.  In reply.

Authors:  Shidong Jia; Liangxuan Zhang; Gary J Latham
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-04-10

3.  Anchored multiplex PCR for targeted next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Zongli Zheng; Matthew Liebers; Boryana Zhelyazkova; Yi Cao; Divya Panditi; Kerry D Lynch; Juxiang Chen; Hayley E Robinson; Hyo Sup Shim; Juliann Chmielecki; William Pao; Jeffrey A Engelman; A John Iafrate; Long Phi Le
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Wild-type Blocking PCR Combined with Direct Sequencing as a Highly Sensitive Method for Detection of Low-Frequency Somatic Mutations.

Authors:  Adam Z Albitar; Wanlong Ma; Maher Albitar
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Validation Strategy for Ultrasensitive Mutation Detection.

Authors:  Marija Debeljak; Michael Noë; Stacy L Riel; Lisa M Haley; Alexis L Norris; Derek A Anderson; Emily M Adams; Masaya Suenaga; Katie F Beierl; Ming-Tseh Lin; Michael G Goggins; Christopher D Gocke; James R Eshleman
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.074

6.  Generating Exome Enriched Sequencing Libraries from Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue DNA for Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Beth A Marosy; Brian D Craig; Kurt N Hetrick; P Dane Witmer; Hua Ling; Sean M Griffith; Benjamin Myers; Elaine A Ostrander; Janet L Stanford; Lawrence C Brody; Kimberly F Doheny
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2017-01-11

7.  Performance of amplicon-based next generation DNA sequencing for diagnostic gene mutation profiling in oncopathology.

Authors:  Daoud Sie; Peter J F Snijders; Gerrit A Meijer; Marije W Doeleman; Marinda I H van Moorsel; Hendrik F van Essen; Paul P Eijk; Katrien Grünberg; Nicole C T van Grieken; Erik Thunnissen; Henk M Verheul; Egbert F Smit; Bauke Ylstra; Daniëlle A M Heideman
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 6.730

8.  BRCA to the future: towards best testing practice in the era of personalised healthcare.

Authors:  Ettore Capoluongo
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Cytosine deamination is a major cause of baseline noise in next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Guoli Chen; Stacy Mosier; Christopher D Gocke; Ming-Tseh Lin; James R Eshleman
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.074

10.  How does inflammation drive mutagenesis in colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Chia Wei Hsu; Mark L Sowers; Willie Hsu; Eduardo Eyzaguirre; Suimin Qiu; Celia Chao; Charles P Mouton; Yuri Fofanov; Pomila Singh; Lawrence C Sowers
Journal:  Trends Cancer Res       Date:  2017
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.