Literature DB >> 23648960

Tracing the emergence of categorical speech perception in the human auditory system.

Gavin M Bidelman1, Sylvain Moreno, Claude Alain.   

Abstract

Speech perception requires the effortless mapping from smooth, seemingly continuous changes in sound features into discrete perceptual units, a conversion exemplified in the phenomenon of categorical perception. Explaining how/when the human brain performs this acoustic-phonetic transformation remains an elusive problem in current models and theories of speech perception. In previous attempts to decipher the neural basis of speech perception, it is often unclear whether the alleged brain correlates reflect an underlying percept or merely changes in neural activity that covary with parameters of the stimulus. Here, we recorded neuroelectric activity generated at both cortical and subcortical levels of the auditory pathway elicited by a speech vowel continuum whose percept varied categorically from /u/ to /a/. This integrative approach allows us to characterize how various auditory structures code, transform, and ultimately render the perception of speech material as well as dissociate brain responses reflecting changes in stimulus acoustics from those that index true internalized percepts. We find that activity from the brainstem mirrors properties of the speech waveform with remarkable fidelity, reflecting progressive changes in speech acoustics but not the discrete phonetic classes reported behaviorally. In comparison, patterns of late cortical evoked activity contain information reflecting distinct perceptual categories and predict the abstract phonetic speech boundaries heard by listeners. Our findings demonstrate a critical transformation in neural speech representations between brainstem and early auditory cortex analogous to an acoustic-phonetic mapping necessary to generate categorical speech percepts. Analytic modeling demonstrates that a simple nonlinearity accounts for the transformation between early (subcortical) brain activity and subsequent cortical/behavioral responses to speech (>150-200 ms) thereby describing a plausible mechanism by which the brain achieves its acoustic-to-phonetic mapping. Results provide evidence that the neurophysiological underpinnings of categorical speech are present cortically by ~175 ms after sound enters the ear.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23648960     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  43 in total

1.  A novel EEG paradigm to simultaneously and rapidly assess the functioning of auditory and visual pathways.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Andrew S Kessler; Laurel A Lawyer; David P Corina; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Listening to the brainstem: musicianship enhances intelligibility of subcortical representations for speech.

Authors:  Michael W Weiss; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Acoustic noise and vision differentially warp the auditory categorization of speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Lauren Sigley; Gwyneth A Lewis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Lexical Information Guides Retuning of Neural Patterns in Perceptual Learning for Speech.

Authors:  Sahil Luthra; João M Correia; Dave F Kleinschmidt; Laura Mesite; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Hidden Markov modeling of frequency-following responses to Mandarin lexical tones.

Authors:  Fernando Llanos; Zilong Xie; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Noise differentially impacts phoneme representations in the auditory and speech motor systems.

Authors:  Yi Du; Bradley R Buchsbaum; Cheryl L Grady; Claude Alain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Age-Related Compensation Mechanism Revealed in the Cortical Representation of Degraded Speech.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Lindsey Roque; Casey R Gaskins; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-08

8.  Effects of formant proximity and stimulus prototypicality on the neural discrimination of vowels: Evidence from the auditory frequency-following response.

Authors:  T Christina Zhao; Matthew Masapollo; Linda Polka; Lucie Ménard; Patricia K Kuhl
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Afferent-efferent connectivity between auditory brainstem and cortex accounts for poorer speech-in-noise comprehension in older adults.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Caitlin N Price; Dawei Shen; Stephen R Arnott; Claude Alain
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  The what, where and how of auditory-object perception.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.