Literature DB >> 23648212

Amplitude modulated chirp excitation to reduce grating lobes and maintain ultrasound intensity at the focus of an array.

Chandra P Karunakaran1, Michael L Oelze.   

Abstract

During application of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with therapy arrays, the existence of grating lobes can cause heating at unintended tissue regions. Therefore, the reduction of grating lobes in therapeutic arrays is an important goal. One way to reduce the grating lobes in therapy arrays is to excite the arrays with broadband signals (defined here as >10% fractional bandwidth). To achieve a reduction in grating lobe levels in an ultrasonic array, coded waveforms can be utilized that reduce the grating lobe levels while maintaining the spatial peak temporal average intensity. In this study, a 5-MHz, 9-element, 1.25 mm inter-elemental spacing linear array was excited by a sinusoidal waveform, a conventional linear chirp, and a modified linear chirp. Both chirps spanned the -3-dB bandwidth of the transducer. The conventional chirp was a broadband signal with a linear sweep of frequencies between 2.5 and 7.5 MHz, with all frequency components excited with equal amplitude. The modified chirp signal also swept the frequencies between 2.5 and 7.5 MHz, but the amplitude was weighted such that the edges (low and high frequencies of the band) were excited with more energy than the center of the band. In simulations, the field patterns for the sinusoidal, conventional chirp and modified chirp excitations were produced from the array using Field II and compared. For experiments, the beam pattern from a 5-MHz single-element transducer was mapped using a hydrophone for the sinusoidal, conventional chirp and modified chirp excitation. Each field from the transducer was repeated and summed to produce a field from an array of 9 elements. The difference in the time averaged intensity (in dB) in the main lobe and grating lobes were estimated for each excitation and compared. The results demonstrated that the chirp signals resulted in decreases in grating lobe levels compared to the main lobe, i.e. 10 dB down for focusing and 6 dB down for focusing and steering. A further 1 dB decrease in grating lobe levels was observed for the modified chirp excitation compared to the conventional chirp excitation, which corresponds to ~21% reduction in energy deposition at the grating lobe location.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23648212      PMCID: PMC3674191          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  11 in total

1.  Ultrasound phased arrays for prostate treatment.

Authors:  J S Tan; L A Frizzell; N Sanghvi; S J Wu; R Seip; J T Kouzmanoff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Dual-mode ultrasound phased arrays for image-guided surgery.

Authors:  Emad S Ebbini; Hui Yao; Ajay Shrestha
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.578

Review 3.  Role of acoustic cavitation in the delivery and monitoring of cancer treatment by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).

Authors:  C C Coussios; C H Farny; G Ter Haar; R A Roy
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.914

4.  Bandwidth and resolution enhancement through pulse compression.

Authors:  Michael L Oelze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Pulse elongation and deconvolution filtering for medical ultrasonic imaging.

Authors:  B Haider; P A Lewin; K E Thomenius
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers.

Authors:  J A Jensen; N B Svendsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Intracavitary ultrasound phased arrays for prostate thermal therapies: MRI compatibility and in vivo testing.

Authors:  E B Hutchinson; K Hynynen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Ultrasound therapy transducers with space-filling non-periodic arrays.

Authors:  Balasundar I Raju; Christopher S Hall; Ralf Seip
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Design and optimization of an aperiodic ultrasound phased array for intracavitary prostate thermal therapies.

Authors:  E B Hutchinson; M T Buchanan; K Hynynen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Design and experimental evaluation of an intracavitary ultrasound phased array system for hyperthermia.

Authors:  M T Buchanan; K Hynynen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  1 in total

1.  HIFU Drive System Miniaturization Using Harmonic Reduced Pulsewidth Modulation.

Authors:  Chris Adams; Thomas M Carpenter; David Cowell; Steven Freear; James R McLaughlan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.725

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.