Literature DB >> 23646071

Associations between the concurrent use of clinical decision support and computerized provider order entry and the rates of appropriate prescribing at discharge.

M E Patterson1, P A Marken, S D Simon, J L Hackman, R S Schaefer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Electronic health record systems used in conjunction with clinical decision support (CDS) or computerized provider order entry (CPOE) have shown potential in improving quality of care, yet less is known about the effects of combination use of CDS and CPOE on prescribing rates at discharge.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the effectiveness of combination use of CDS and CPOE on appropriate drug prescribing rates at discharge for AMI or HF patients.
METHODS: Combination use of CDS and CPOE is defined as hospitals self-reporting full implementation across all hospital units of CDS reminders, CDS guidelines, and CPOE. Appropriate prescribing rates of aspirin, ACEI/ARBs, or beta blockers are defined using quality measures from Hospital Compare. Multivariate linear regressions are used to test for differences in mean appropriate prescribing rates between hospitals reporting combination use of CDS and CPOE, compared to those reporting the singular use of one or the other, or the absence of both. Covariates include hospital size, region, and ownership status.
RESULTS: Approximately 10% of the sample reported full implementation of both CDS and CPOE, while 7% and 17% reported full use of only CPOE or only CDS, respectively. Hospitals reporting full use of CDS only reported between 0.2% (95% CI 0.04 - 1.0) and 1.6% (95% CI 0.6 - 2.6) higher appropriate prescribing rates compared to hospitals reporting use of neither system. Rates of prescribing by hospitals reporting full use of both CPOE and CDS did not significantly differ from the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Although associations found between full implementation of CDS and appropriate prescribing rates suggest that clinical decision tools are sufficient compared to basic EHR systems in improving prescribing at discharge, the modest differences raise doubt about the clinical relevance of the findings. Future studies need to continue investigating the causal nature and clinical relevance of these associations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic health records and systems; clinical decision support; guidelines and protocols; inpatient computerized provider order entry; medication management; quantitative methodologies

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23646071      PMCID: PMC3613019          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2011-11-RA-0068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  14 in total

1.  Improving safety with information technology.

Authors:  David W Bates; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The effect of health information technology on quality in U.S. hospitals.

Authors:  Jeffrey S McCullough; Michelle Casey; Ira Moscovice; Shailendra Prasad
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amit X Garg; Neill K J Adhikari; Heather McDonald; M Patricia Rosas-Arellano; P J Devereaux; Joseph Beyene; Justina Sam; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  The impact of computerized physician medication order entry in hospitalized patients--a systematic review.

Authors:  Saeid Eslami; Nicolette F de Keizer; Ameen Abu-Hanna
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Effects of an integrated clinical information system on medication safety in a multi-hospital setting.

Authors:  Charles D Mahoney; Christine M Berard-Collins; Reid Coleman; Joseph F Amaral; Carole M Cotter
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 6.  Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Thomas R Talbot; David L Sanders; S Trent Rosenbloom; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Early cost and safety benefits of an inpatient electronic health record.

Authors:  Jonathan A Zlabek; Jared W Wickus; Michelle A Mathiason
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Patient safety and computerized medication ordering at Brigham and Women's Hospital.

Authors:  G J Kuperman; J M Teich; T K Gandhi; D W Bates
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2001-10

9.  Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  D W Bates; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; S D Small; D Servi; G Laffel; B J Sweitzer; B F Shea; R Hallisey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-07-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Just what the doctor ordered. Review of the evidence of the impact of computerized physician order entry system on medication errors.

Authors:  Tatyana A Shamliyan; Sue Duval; Jing Du; Robert L Kane
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Personalization and Patient Involvement in Decision Support Systems: Current Trends.

Authors:  S Quaglini; L Sacchi; G Lanzola; N Viani
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2015-08-13

2.  Use of Hospital Information System to Improve the Quality of Health Care from Clinical Staff Perspective.

Authors:  Ali Mohammadpour; Mohammad Mehdi Ghaemi; Reza Darrudi; Hassan Ebrahimpour Sadagheyani
Journal:  Galen Med J       Date:  2021-11-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.