| Literature DB >> 23641180 |
Yoshihiro Okabe1, Tohru Ariizumi, Hiroshi Ezura.
Abstract
The dwarf tomato variety Micro-Tom is regarded as a model system for functional genomics studies in tomato. Various tomato genomic tools in the genetic background of Micro-Tom have been established, such as mutant collections, genome information and a metabolomic database. Recent advances in tomato genome sequencing have brought about a significant need for reverse genetics tools that are accessible to the larger community, because a great number of gene sequences have become available from public databases. To meet the requests from the tomato research community, we have developed the Micro-Tom Targeting-Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes (TILLING) platform, which is comprised of more than 5000 EMS-mutagenized lines. The platform serves as a reverse genetics tool for efficiently identifying mutant alleles in parallel with the development of Micro-Tom mutant collections. The combination of Micro-Tom mutant libraries and the TILLING approach enables researchers to accelerate the isolation of desirable mutants for unraveling gene function or breeding. To upgrade the genomic tool of Micro-Tom, the development of a new mutagenized population is underway. In this paper, the current status of the Micro-Tom TILLING platform and its future prospects are described.Entities:
Keywords: Micro-Tom; TILLING; reverse genetics; tomato
Year: 2013 PMID: 23641180 PMCID: PMC3621444 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.63.42
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Overview of TILLING platform in tomato
| Cultivar | Population size | EMS dose | Mutation frequency | Screening Method | Screened gene | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M82 | 4759 | 0.7% | 1/574 kb | LI-COR/ENDO1 | ||
| Micro-Tom | 2180, 872 | 0.5%, 1.0% | 1/1710 kb, 1/737 kb | LI-COR/ENDO1 | ||
| Red Setter | 3885, 1284 | 0.7%, 1.0% | 1/574 kb, 1/322 kb | LI-COR/ENDO1 | ||
| TPPADASU | 8225 | 1.0% | 1/737 kb | HRM and CSCE |
Summary of the current Micro-Tom TILLING platform
| Category | Year | EMS condition | Population size | Mutation frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population 1 | 2005–2006 | 0.5% | 2180 | 1/1710 kb |
| Population 2 | 2008–2009 | 1.0% | 872 | 1/737 kb |
| Population 3 (New) | 2010–2011 | 1.0%, 0.7% | 2033 | ~1/600 kb |
| Population 4 (New) | 2012–2013 | 1.0% + 1.0% | ~1900 | ND |
ND, not determined
Fig. 1Flow chart for constructing mutant populations with double-EMS mutagenesis. The conventional process of EMS mutagenesis (upper panel) was described by Saito . In the following steps, bulked M3 (M3M0) seeds were mutagenized with 1.0% EMS and M3M1 seeds were sown in the greenhouse to harvest M4M2 seeds from single M3M1 plants. Ten M4M2 seeds were sown and grown as an M4M2 line and M5M3 seeds were harvested from the same M4M2 lines as a bulked seed. Mutant DNA was extracted from each M4M2 line (10 plants per line) and pooled as 8-fold DNA for TILLING screening.