Literature DB >> 23136486

Potential of a mutant-based reverse genetic approach for functional genomics and molecular breeding in soybean.

Toyoaki Anai1.   

Abstract

Mutant-based reverse genetics offers a powerful way to create novel mutant alleles at a selected locus. This approach makes it possible to directly identify plants that carry a specific modified gene from the nucleotide sequence data. Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] has a highly redundant paleopolyploid genome (approx. 1.1 Gb), which was completely sequenced in 2010. Using reverse genetics to support functional genomics studies designed to predict gene function would accelerate post-genomics research in soybean. Furthermore, the novel mutant alleles created by this approach would be useful genetic resources for improving various traits in soybean. A reverse genetic screening platform in soybean has been developed that combines more than 40,000 mutant lines with a high-throughput method, Targeting Local Lesions IN Genome (TILLING). In this review, the mutant-based reverse genetic approach based on this platform is described, and the likely evolution of this approach in the near future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TILLING; mutagenesis; reverse genetics; soybean

Year:  2012        PMID: 23136486      PMCID: PMC3406801          DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.61.462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breed Sci        ISSN: 1344-7610            Impact factor:   2.086


Introduction

Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is one of the most important leguminous crops. As a legume it has symbiotic nitrogen fixation ability, and is a major global source of proteins and oil for human and animal consumption. The genome sequence of soybean (cv. Williams 82) was completed using a whole-genome shotgun method in 2010 (Schmutz ). Soybean’s paleopolyploid genome, which is approximately 1.1 Gb long, comprises ~46,000 predicted genes, of which nearly 75% are multiple copies. The integrated soybean genome database Soybase (http://www.soybase.org) provides public access to the nucleotide sequences and other useful information on soybean (e.g., mapped genes, orthologs and markers). The genome sequence information is useful for traditional (forward genetics) analysis. For example, Watanabe , 2011) reported map-based cloning of two genes for maturity quantitative trait loci using a residual heterozygous line. On the other hand, reverse genetic tools and resources have proven to be indispensable for discovering the biological functions of sequenced genes and for developing novel alleles for specific traits. The soybean genome sequence is an essential tool for accelerating reverse genetic studies. Because the methods of reverse genetics were developed mainly in studies of Arabidopsis, many are based on transgenic technology (Table 1). However, transgenic technology is not a realistic approach for commercial crops such as soybean, because developing and maintaining a huge number of transgenic plants is a time-consuming and labor-intensive process. In contrast, mutant-based reverse genetic methods provide a more practical and potent alternative. There are several major benefits of using a mutant population for reverse genetic analysis: (1) The mutagenesis protocols are well established; (2) A large number of independent mutants can be obtained simultaneously; (3) There is no legal restrictions on the handling and transfer of the mutants, unlike with transgenic plants. Dozens of reverse genetic methods for screening mutant populations have been developed around different mutagens and mutant types. These include the Deletagene (Delete-a-gene) method (Li ), high-resolution melting (HRM; Gady ), comparative genomic hybridization (CGH; Bolon ), and Targeting Local Lesions IN Genomes (TILLING; McCallum ).
Table 1

Comparison of typical methods used for reverse genetic studies of plants

MethodResource typeMutation specificityMutation stabilityAllelic variationsScreening throughputReference
Gene silencingRecombinantUncontrollableUnstableUncontrollableDepends on the hostSchwab et al. (2006)
OverexpressionRecombinantUncontrollableUnstableUncontrollableDepends on the hostIchikawa et al. (2006)
T-DNA taggingRecombinantRandomStableLimitedDepends on the hostSessions et al. (2002)
Transposon taggingRecombinant*RandomStableLimitedDepends on the hostTissier et al. (1999)
Zinc-finger nucleaseRecombinantSpecificStablePossibleLowLloyd et al. (2005)
Homologous recombinationRecombinantSpecificStablePossibleVery lowShaked et al. (2005)
DeletageneNon-recombinantRandomStableLimitedHighLi et al. (2001)
TILLINGNon-recombinantRandomStableAvailableMediumMcCallum et al. (2000)

In the case of rice, a highly active endogenous transposon (Tos17) is available for use in the transposon tagging system (Miyao ).

Transformation efficiency of the host plant species is the bottleneck for these systems.

This review provides a brief overview of recent advances in the reverse genetics of crop plants. Furthermore, a mutant collection and TILLING-based high-throughput screening system is described. This paper concludes with the likely future perspectives for the molecular breeding of soybean.

Reverse genetic screening for different types of mutant resource

The size and complexity of a mutant resource is the most important factor for successfully screening mutants by means of the reverse genetic approach. Since the features of a mutant resource depend mainly on the types and doses of mutagens used to create it, the choice of screening method is also important. For example, ionizing radiation (e.g., X-rays, gamma rays and fast neutrons) induces mainly nucleotide deletions of various sizes at a relatively low density (Cecchini , Shirley ). In this case, the large deletions (≥5 kb) may completely eliminate multiple functional loci and their functions, whereas the small deletions (1 to 100 b) lead to partial loss of nucleotide sequences, and frequently induce frame-shift, amino acid–truncation, or mis-splicing mutations that lead to complete loss of function of the target genes (Anai , 2008, 2012). In contrast, several popular chemical mutagens [e.g., ethylmethane sulfonate (EMS) and N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (NMU)] induce mainly single-base substitutions at high density (Greene , Satoh ). The base substitutions induce not only effective mutations such as nonsense, mis-sense, and mis-splicing mutations, but also gene-silencing mutations. These chemical mutagens are attractive because they can take advantage of smaller mutant populations than the other methods. However, the detection of mutants carrying a specific base substitution or small deletion is more difficult than for large deletions. Two potent screening methods, Deletagene and CGH, are appropriate choices for obtaining mutants with large deletions. The PCR-based Deletagene approach is a simple high-throughput screening method that uses highly pooled (~2500 lines/pool) genomic DNAs prepared from mutant lines treated with fast neutrons as templates (Li ). In this method, it is necessary to position both primers outside of the deleted region; however, it is difficult to accurately predict the size of each deletion, so designing the primers is a rate-limiting step. The hybridization-based CGH approach is a traditional dot-blot-like method, which uses a high-density microarray containing about 700 000 unique probes to screen a population irradiated with fast neutrons (Bolon ). Because of the low mutation rate in these two types of lines, it is necessary to use a large mutant population in both methods. In addition, the cost of a CGH microarray is currently so expensive that it is difficult to use the microarrays to directly screen a specific mutant from a large mutant population. Currently, the TILLING approach is one of the most attractive screening methods for mutant-based reverse genetics. This method has several advantages over the other methods used to detect single-nucleotide polymorphisms because of its high sensitivity and throughput. TILLING was originally reported as a method to detect mismatches in heteroduplex DNA when denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography was used (McCallum ). Subsequently, it was modified to use a mismatch-specific nuclease (CEL I) and the LI-COR gel imaging system with fluorescent dye–labeled primers to improve its throughput (Colbert ). CEL I can efficiently cleave both the base substitutions induced by chemical mutagens and the small deletions induced by ionizing radiation (Oleykowski ). For this reason, the mutant resources used with the TILLING method have been developed mainly by means of treatment with EMS, but some research groups have successfully isolated several mutants from populations treated with other mutagens (Table 2). These results indicate that the mutant resources obtained from various mutagen treatments could be widely adapted to the TILLING method.
Table 2

Overview of the mutant resources used in the TILLING method in various plant species

MutagenMutation typePlant speciesMutagen doseMutation frequencyReference
Chemical agents
 EMSPoint mutationsArabidopsis20–40 mM3.3/MbGreene et al. (2003)
 EMSPoint mutationsBarley20–30 mM1.0/MbCaldwell et al. (2004)
 EMSPoint mutationsBrassica napus24–48 mM7.6–24.1/MbWang et al. (2008)
 EMSPoint mutationsBrassica rapa24–32 mM16.7/MbStephenson et al. (2010)
 EMSPoint mutationsMaize5 mM*0.9–2.1/MbWeil and Morde (2007)
 EMSPoint mutationsMedicago12 mM2.1/MbLe Signor et al. (2009)
 EMSPoint mutationsPea4 mM1.5/MbTriques et al. (2007)
 EMSPoint mutationsPeanut30–96 mM0.9–1.1/MbKnoll et al. (2011)
 EMSPoint mutationsRice130 mM3.8/MbTill et al. (2007)
 EMSPoint mutationsSorghum8–24 mM1.9/MbXin et al. (2008)
 EMSPoint mutationsSoybean40–50 mM1.8–7.1/MbCooper et al. (2008)
 EMSPoint mutationsSoybean30–40 mM0.3–1.3/MbPresent study
 EMSPoint mutationsTomato56–80 mM1.7–3.1/MbMinoia et al. (2010)
 EMSPoint mutationsWheat60–96 mM41.7/MbSlade et al. (2005)
 EMSPoint mutationsWheat (durum)60–80 mM25.0/MbSlade et al. (2005)
 NMUPoint mutationsRice1 mM*7.4/MbSuzuki et al. (2008)
 NMUPoint mutationsSoybean2.5 mM7.1/MbCooper et al. (2008)
 NaN3Point mutationsBarley10 mM2.6/MbTalamè et al. (2008)

Physical agents
 γ-raysDeletions/point mutationsRice500 Gy0.2/MbSato et al. (2006)
 X-raysDeletionsSoybean200 Gy0.1/MbPresent study

EMS, ethylmethane sulfonate; NMU, N-methyl-N-nitrosourea

These mutant populations were developed from progeny pollinated with mutagen-treated pollen.

A TILLING platform for soybean

The TILLING approach has three main advantages for crop species: (1) It can generate a wide range of genetic alterations in addition to loss-of-function alleles, including hypo-morphic, hypermorphic and neo-morphic mutations. (2) It can produce permanent and heritable mutations. (3) It can be adapted to polyploid species and functionally redundant genes. Because these benefits are particularly attractive for crop improvement efforts, reverse genetics projects that use the TILLING method are now under way for many crop species, including barley, maize, pea, rice, soybean, tomato and wheat (Table 2). In these projects, several thousands or tens of thousands of mutant plants are necessary to isolate specific mutants. In soybean, Cooper first reported the development of a TILLING system. They developed three EMS-treated populations and an NMU-treated population, and estimated mutation rates ranging from 1.8 to 7.1/Mb. Dierking and Bilyeu (2009) successfully isolated novel mutant alleles for the raffinose synthase gene (RS2) and the omega-6 fatty acid desaturase gene (FAD2-1A) using this system. We have developed a soybean mutant population consisting of more than 40 000 lines, and have developed an improved TILLING method adapted for high-throughput screening (Fig. 1). This mutant population contains six sub-populations that have mutation rates ranging from 0.1 to 1.3/Mb that were generated through the use of X-rays, EMS, or a combination of the two (Fig. 2). In the TILLING protocol, the cleavage with a mismatch-specific nuclease and the gel electrophoresis are the most important steps. Generally, increasing the mutation density is thought to be a good idea to reduce the size of the population, but a mutant containing too many mutations would be difficult to analyze in terms of its phenotype and difficult to use as breeding material. For these reasons, the mutation rate in the TILLING population must be carefully considered so that it will be appropriate for the purpose of the mutants that are obtained. The activity of the mismatch-specific nuclease has been detected in many plant species (Oleykowski ). For TILLING, the most commonly used CEL I was obtained from celery, and Yang reported that CEL I preferentially recognized particular mismatches. Triques reported that recombinant ENDO1, which is a mismatch-specific Arabidopsis endonuclease, strongly recognized many types of mismatches and was useful for TILLING. In our system, we detect CEL I–digested double-strand DNA fragments that are pre-stained with a highly sensitive fluorescent dye and separated by means of agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig. 1). We could detect all types of mismatch with this approach. The possible reason of this result may be the presence of two different heteroduplexes originated from both strands of PCR product and/or the higher CEL I concentration optimized for double-strand cleavage system. However, the frequency of false-positive cleavages may be increased by the substrate specificity of CEL I.
Fig. 1

Outline of the development of a soybean mutant population and the process of mutant screening employing the TILLING approach.

Fig. 2

Summary of the soybean mutant populations developed at Saga University. * FukuHOLL is an experimental line that has been described previously (Hoshino ).

We have also constructed a high-throughput soybean TILLING system that enables a single person to screen about 6000 independent mutant lines in a day. We have successfully isolated some novel alleles of genes that control maturity (Watanabe , 2011) and of a fatty acid desaturase gene (Hoshino ) using this platform.

Future prospects for reverse genetics in soybean

During the past decade, large-scale genome sequencing projects have been completed in several major crop species, including soybean, and a huge volume of nucleotide sequence data corresponding to individual genes is now available from public databases. Thus, the development of robust tools for linking the nucleotide sequence of a particular gene to the phenotype produced by its alleles has been desired by the research community. The mutant-based reverse genetic approach described in this paper, which can create novel alleles associated with “perfect markers” (Varshney ) for a particular gene, has the potential to allow breeders to improve a range of crops without using transgenic technology. This approach can therefore overcome the difficulty of conventional breeding programs, such as the functional redundancy of polyploid genomes and the pyramiding of multiple alleles. This approach may shift the perception of genetic resources in agricultural studies, because it brings about not only loss-of-function mutants with various degrees of impairment but also provides gain-of-function mutants. In fact, a novel mutant virus-resistance allele of the eIF4E gene was obtained from EMS-mutagenized tomato populations using the TILLING approach (Piron ). To efficiently generate gain-of-function alleles from a mutant population, it is necessary to drastically increase the throughput of TILLING. In recent years, new DNA sequencing technologies that provide very high throughput at a relatively low price, the so-called “next-generation sequencing” (NGS) technologies, have been progressively developed, and the cost of sequencing massive amounts of DNA has rapidly decreased (Ansorge 2009). This progress of NGS will have important implications for achieving next-generation reverse genetics, because the most secure way to identify mutations is by comparison of nucleotide sequences between wild-type and mutant alleles. Most recently, Tsai reported novel TILLING method using NGS, Illumina GA platform, but this protocol contains cumbersome process for separation of mutation signal from large background noise. The current read length of NGS is much shorter than that of Sanger sequencing, so a longer read length (at least 400 to 500 bp/read) will be necessary to adapt NGS to efficient reverse genetic screening. However, Schadt believe that the read-length problem will be overcome within a few years, after which mass-sequencing of multi-dimensionally pooled mutant DNAs will become a major tool for reverse genetic screening. The mutant resources of soybean will become increasingly important for both functional genomics research and developing breeding materials as these tools mature.
  39 in total

1.  High-throughput screening for induced point mutations.

Authors:  T Colbert; B J Till; R Tompa; S Reynolds; M N Steine; A T Yeung; C M McCallum; L Comai; S Henikoff
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  A high-throughput Arabidopsis reverse genetics system.

Authors:  Allen Sessions; Ellen Burke; Gernot Presting; George Aux; John McElver; David Patton; Bob Dietrich; Patrick Ho; Johana Bacwaden; Cynthia Ko; Joseph D Clarke; David Cotton; David Bullis; Jennifer Snell; Trini Miguel; Don Hutchison; Bill Kimmerly; Theresa Mitzel; Fumiaki Katagiri; Jane Glazebrook; Marc Law; Stephen A Goff
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Targeted mutagenesis using zinc-finger nucleases in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Alan Lloyd; Christopher L Plaisier; Dana Carroll; Gary N Drews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Mutation detection using a novel plant endonuclease.

Authors:  C A Oleykowski; C R Bronson Mullins; A K Godwin; A T Yeung
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Characterization of gamma irradiation-induced deletion mutations at a selectable locus in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  E Cecchini; B J Mulligan; S N Covey; J J Milner
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1998-06-05       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Targeted screening for induced mutations.

Authors:  C M McCallum; L Comai; E A Greene; S Henikoff
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Purification, cloning, and characterization of the CEL I nuclease.

Authors:  B Yang; X Wen; N S Kodali; C A Oleykowski; C G Miller; J Kulinski; D Besack; J A Yeung; D Kowalski; A T Yeung
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-04-04       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  A reverse genetic, nontransgenic approach to wheat crop improvement by TILLING.

Authors:  Ann J Slade; Susan I Fuerstenberg; Dayna Loeffler; Michael N Steine; Daniel Facciotti
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2004-12-05       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  A structured mutant population for forward and reverse genetics in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).

Authors:  David G Caldwell; Nicola McCallum; Paul Shaw; Gary J Muehlbauer; David F Marshall; Robbie Waugh
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.417

10.  Spectrum of chemically induced mutations from a large-scale reverse-genetic screen in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Greene; Christine A Codomo; Nicholas E Taylor; Jorja G Henikoff; Bradley J Till; Steven H Reynolds; Linda C Enns; Chris Burtner; Jessica E Johnson; Anthony R Odden; Luca Comai; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  13 in total

1.  Targeted mutagenesis in soybean using the CRISPR-Cas9 system.

Authors:  Xianjun Sun; Zheng Hu; Rui Chen; Qiyang Jiang; Guohua Song; Hui Zhang; Yajun Xi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Allelic variation of soybean flower color gene W4 encoding dihydroflavonol 4-reductase 2.

Authors:  Fan Yan; Shaokang Di; Felipe Rojas Rodas; Tito Rodriguez Torrico; Yoshinori Murai; Tsukasa Iwashina; Toyoaki Anai; Ryoji Takahashi
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.215

3.  Mutant selection in the self-incompatible plant radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. sativus) using two-step TILLING.

Authors:  Kaori Kohzuma; Motoko Chiba; Soichiro Nagano; Toyoaki Anai; Miki U Ueda; Riichi Oguchi; Kazumasa Shirai; Kousuke Hanada; Kouki Hikosaka; Nobuharu Fujii
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Virus-induced down-regulation of GmERA1A and GmERA1B genes enhances the stomatal response to abscisic acid and drought resistance in soybean.

Authors:  Takuya Ogata; Yukari Nagatoshi; Noriko Yamagishi; Nobuyuki Yoshikawa; Yasunari Fujita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Development and utilization of a new chemically-induced soybean library with a high mutation density .

Authors:  Zhongfeng Li; Lingxue Jiang; Yansong Ma; Zhongyan Wei; Huilong Hong; Zhangxiong Liu; Jinhui Lei; Ying Liu; Rongxia Guan; Yong Guo; Longguo Jin; Lijuan Zhang; Yinghui Li; Yulong Ren; Wei He; Ming Liu; Nang Myint Phyu Sin Htwe; Lin Liu; Bingfu Guo; Jian Song; Bing Tan; Guifeng Liu; Maiquan Li; Xianli Zhang; Bo Liu; Xuehui Shi; Sining Han; Sunan Hua; Fulai Zhou; Lili Yu; Yanfei Li; Shuang Wang; Jun Wang; Ruzhen Chang; Lijuan Qiu
Journal:  J Integr Plant Biol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.061

6.  Confirmation of the pleiotropic control of leaflet shape and number of seeds per pod by the Ln gene in induced soybean mutants.

Authors:  Takashi Sayama; Takanari Tanabata; Masayasu Saruta; Testsuya Yamada; Toyoaki Anai; Akito Kaga; Masao Ishimoto
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Updating the Micro-Tom TILLING platform.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Okabe; Tohru Ariizumi; Hiroshi Ezura
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  A novel GmFAD3-2a mutant allele developed through TILLING reduces α-linolenic acid content in soybean seed oil.

Authors:  Tomoki Hoshino; Satoshi Watanabe; Yutaka Takagi; Toyoaki Anai
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Optimization of a Virus-Induced Gene Silencing System with Soybean yellow common mosaic virus for Gene Function Studies in Soybeans.

Authors:  Kil Hyun Kim; Seungmo Lim; Yang Jae Kang; Min Young Yoon; Moon Nam; Tae Hwan Jun; Min-Jung Seo; Seong-Bum Baek; Jeom-Ho Lee; Jung-Kyung Moon; Suk-Ha Lee; Su-Heon Lee; Hyoun-Sub Lim; Jae Sun Moon; Chang-Hwan Park
Journal:  Plant Pathol J       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 1.795

10.  Construction of a high-density mutant library in soybean and development of a mutant retrieval method using amplicon sequencing.

Authors:  Mai Tsuda; Akito Kaga; Toyoaki Anai; Takehiko Shimizu; Takashi Sayama; Kyoko Takagi; Kayo Machita; Satoshi Watanabe; Minoru Nishimura; Naohiro Yamada; Satomi Mori; Harumi Sasaki; Hiroyuki Kanamori; Yuichi Katayose; Masao Ishimoto
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.