OBJECTIVES: Hypertension guidelines recommend screening for chronic kidney disease (CKD) using serum creatinine and urine dipstick; this strategy may lead to misclassification. Persons with occult CKD [i.e. missed by creatinine but detected by cystatin C or albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR)] have higher risks for death, cardiovascular events, and end-stage renal disease. METHODS: We studied occult CKD prevalence among nondiabetic, hypertensive adults in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988-1994 (N = 2088) and 1999-2002 (N = 737). We defined occult CKD as estimated glomerular filtration rate by cystatin C (eGFRcys) less than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m and/or ACR at least 30 mg/g among persons with eGFRcreat more than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m. We studied occult CKD prevalence by either marker, stratified by age, race/ethnicity, and assessed clinical predictors associated with occult CKD presence. RESULTS: In 1988-1994, occult CKD was prevalent among 25% of nondiabetic hypertensive persons, and it was 22% in 1999-2002. Each marker's ability to detect occult CKD varied by age and race. Cystatin C detected occult CKD among 8.9% of persons more than 65 years, and among 3.8% of whites. ACR detected occult CKD among 9.3% of persons less than 45 years, 16.6% of Blacks, and 20.6% of Mexican-Americans. In multivariate models, each decade of advancing age was associated with a higher occult CKD prevalence by cystatin C (OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.5-3.8) in 1988-1994 and 1999-2002 (OR 2.9, 1.8-4.6). CONCLUSION: Current hypertension guidelines may fail to detect a large proportion of high-risk individuals with CKD who can be identified by cystatin C or ACR. Future studies are needed to evaluate targeted use of multimarker renal panels among hypertensives.
OBJECTIVES:Hypertension guidelines recommend screening for chronic kidney disease (CKD) using serum creatinine and urine dipstick; this strategy may lead to misclassification. Persons with occult CKD [i.e. missed by creatinine but detected by cystatin C or albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR)] have higher risks for death, cardiovascular events, and end-stage renal disease. METHODS: We studied occult CKD prevalence among nondiabetic, hypertensive adults in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988-1994 (N = 2088) and 1999-2002 (N = 737). We defined occult CKD as estimated glomerular filtration rate by cystatin C (eGFRcys) less than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m and/or ACR at least 30 mg/g among persons with eGFRcreat more than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m. We studied occult CKD prevalence by either marker, stratified by age, race/ethnicity, and assessed clinical predictors associated with occult CKD presence. RESULTS: In 1988-1994, occult CKD was prevalent among 25% of nondiabetic hypertensivepersons, and it was 22% in 1999-2002. Each marker's ability to detect occult CKD varied by age and race. Cystatin C detected occult CKD among 8.9% of persons more than 65 years, and among 3.8% of whites. ACR detected occult CKD among 9.3% of persons less than 45 years, 16.6% of Blacks, and 20.6% of Mexican-Americans. In multivariate models, each decade of advancing age was associated with a higher occult CKD prevalence by cystatin C (OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.5-3.8) in 1988-1994 and 1999-2002 (OR 2.9, 1.8-4.6). CONCLUSION: Current hypertension guidelines may fail to detect a large proportion of high-risk individuals with CKD who can be identified by cystatin C or ACR. Future studies are needed to evaluate targeted use of multimarker renal panels among hypertensives.
Authors: Kunihiro Matsushita; Marije van der Velde; Brad C Astor; Mark Woodward; Andrew S Levey; Paul E de Jong; Josef Coresh; Ron T Gansevoort Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michael G Shlipak; Mark J Sarnak; Ronit Katz; Linda F Fried; Stephen L Seliger; Anne B Newman; David S Siscovick; Catherine Stehman-Breen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-05-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Jianguo Zhang; Braden J Manns; Matthew T James; Robert R Quinn; Pietro Ravani; Scott W Klarenbach; Bruce F Culleton; Richard Krause; Laurel Thorlacius; Arsh K Jain; Marcello Tonelli Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lesley A Stevens; Josef Coresh; Christopher H Schmid; Harold I Feldman; Marc Froissart; John Kusek; Jerome Rossert; Frederick Van Lente; Robert D Bruce; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Tom Greene; Andrew S Levey Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Elizabeth Selvin; Jane Manzi; Lesley A Stevens; Frederick Van Lente; David A Lacher; Andrew S Levey; Josef Coresh Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Carmen A Peralta; Paul Muntner; Rebecca Scherzer; Suzanne Judd; Mary Cushman; Michael G Shlipak Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2015-09-19 Impact factor: 3.754