| Literature DB >> 23639008 |
Guo-Jun Xie1, Bing-Feng Liu, De-Feng Xing, Jun Nan, Jie Ding, Nan-Qi Ren.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23639008 PMCID: PMC3648407 DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-64
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Figure 1Hydrogen production kinetics of RLD-53 at different L-cysteine concentrations.
Effect of L-cysteine concentration on hydrogen production kinetics and nitrogenase activity
| 0.0 | 2.33±0.106 | 2610±118 | 24.97 | 36.22 | 0.998 | 957±85 |
| 0.5 | 2.46±0.123 | 2755±137 | 29.35 | 31.77 | 0.997 | 1125±78 |
| 1.0 | 2.58±0.129 | 2878±144 | 32.85 | 27.46 | 0.994 | 1374±94 |
| 1.5 | 1.66±0.114 | 1859±127 | 20.81 | 46.10 | 0.996 | 765±69 |
Figure 2Cell growth and flocculability of RLD-53 at different L-cysteine concentrations.
Figure 3Bioflocculation of RLD-53 at different concentration of L-cysteine. (a) photo of bioflocculation; (b) SEM images of bioflocculation.
Figure 4EPS compositions of RLD-53 at various concentration of L-cysteine. (a), EPS component; (b), thiol group (SH) and disulfide bond (SS) content in EPS.
Figure 5Relationship between disulfide bonds and components of EPS production. (a), Nucleic acid; (b), Humic substances; (c), Proteins; (d), Polysaccharides.
Figure 6Spectral decomposition of the amide I bands at different concentration of L-cysteine (g/l). (a), 0.0; (b), 0.5; (c), 1.0; (d), 1.5.
Conformation changes of EPS proteins from RLD-53 at different concentration of L-cysteine
| Aggregated strands (%) | 1625-1610 | 1.55 | 1.21 | 2.51 | 2.01 |
| β-Sheet (%) | 1640-1630 | 11.33 | 14.73 | 21.09 | 25.31 |
| Random coil (%) | 1645-1640 | 37.50 | 27.30 | 3.28 | 5.52 |
| α-Helix (%) | 1657-1648 | 16.96 | 25.52 | 49.40 | 31.03 |
| 3-Turn helix (%) | 1666-1659 | 20.13 | 27.63 | 21.35 | 34.54 |
| Antiparallel β-sheet/ aggregated strands (%) | 1680-1695 | 12.53 | 3.62 | 2.38 | 1.59 |
Figure 7Contribution of EPS protein conformations to flocculability of RLD-53. (a), Aggregated strands; (b), β-Sheet; (c), Random coil; (d), α-Helix; (e), 3-Turn helix; (f), Antiparallel β-sheet/aggregated strands.
Figure 8Contribution of cell surface functional groups to flocculability of RLD-53. (a), C-(C, H); (b), C-(O, N); (c), C=O, O-C-O; (d), O=C-OH, O=C-OR; (e), C=O; (f), C-OH, C-O-C; (g), C-NH2; (h), O=C-NH-R.
Results of the high-resolution XPS analysis of the C 1s, O 1s and N 1s peak region from cell surface
| | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 69.55 | 20.17 | 6.89 | 3.38 | 48.09 | 51.91 | 99.36 | 0.64 |
| 0.5 | 68.79 | 20.03 | 6.95 | 4.23 | 38.47 | 61.53 | 86.19 | 13.81 |
| 1.0 | 57.10 | 27.18 | 13.73 | 1.98 | 24.98 | 75.02 | 76.20 | 23.80 |
| 1.5 | 59.38 | 27.45 | 9.78 | 3.39 | 70.64 | 29.36 | 83.57 | 16.43 |
Figure 9Effect of charged groups on the zeta potential of RLD-53. (a), COOH, COOR; (b), C-NH2.
Figure 10Contact angle and surface thermodynamic properties of RLD-53. (a), Contact angle; (b), surface thermodynamic properties.
Figure 11Interaction energy profiles as a function of cells distance at various L-cysteine concentrations (g/l). (a), 0.0; (b), 0.5; (c), 1.0; (d), 1.5.