Literature DB >> 23636342

Using the Rasch measurement model in psychometric analysis of the Family Effectiveness Measure.

Linda L McCreary1, Karen M Conrad, Kendon J Conrad, Christy K Scott, Rodney R Funk, Michael L Dennis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Valid assessment of family functioning can play a vital role in optimizing client outcomes. Because family functioning is influenced by family structure, socioeconomic context, and culture, existing measures of family functioning-primarily developed with nuclear, middle-class European American families-may not be valid assessments of families in diverse populations. The Family Effectiveness Measure was developed to address this limitation.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the Family Effectiveness Measure with data from a primarily low-income African American convenience sample using the Rasch measurement model.
METHODS: A sample of 607 adult women completed the measure. Rasch analysis was used to assess unidimensionality, response category functioning, item fit, person reliability, differential item functioning by race and parental status, and item hierarchy. Criterion-related validity was tested using correlations with five other variables related to family functioning.
RESULTS: The Family Effectiveness Measure measures two separate constructs: The Effective Family Functioning construct was a psychometrically sound measure of the target construct that was more efficient because of the deletion of 22 items. The Ineffective Family Functioning construct consisted of 16 of those deleted items but was not as strong psychometrically. Items in both constructs evidenced no differential item functioning by race. Criterion-related validity was supported for both. DISCUSSION: In contrast to the prevailing conceptualization that family functioning is a single construct, assessed by positively and negatively worded items, use of the Rasch analysis suggested the existence of two constructs. Whereas the Effective Family Functioning scale is a strong and efficient measure of family functioning, the Ineffective Family Functioning scale will require additional item development and psychometric testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23636342      PMCID: PMC3678382          DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31828eafe6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  23 in total

1.  Investigating rating scale category utility.

Authors:  J M Linacre
Journal:  J Outcome Meas       Date:  1999

2.  A typology of family social environments.

Authors:  R H Moos; B S Moos
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  1976-12

3.  Measurement equivalence and differential item functioning in family psychology.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Bingenheimer; Stephen W Raudenbush; Tama Leventhal; Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2005-09

Review 4.  The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?

Authors:  Alan Tennant; Philip G Conaghan
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-12-15

5.  Identification of child maltreatment with the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales: development and psychometric data for a national sample of American parents.

Authors:  M A Straus; S L Hamby; D Finkelhor; D W Moore; D Runyan
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  1998-04

6.  Evaluation of the Congruence Model with rehabilitating substance abusers.

Authors:  M L Friedemann
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 7.  Marital and family processes in the context of alcohol use and alcohol disorders.

Authors:  Kenneth E Leonard; Rina D Eiden
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 18.561

8.  The reverse of social anxiety is not always the opposite: the reverse-scored items of the social interaction anxiety scale do not belong.

Authors:  Thomas L Rodebaugh; Carol M Woods; Richard G Heimberg
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2007-02-21

9.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

10.  Comparing traditional and Rasch analyses of the Mississippi PTSD Scale: revealing limitations of reverse-scored items.

Authors:  Kendon J Conrad; Benjamin D Wright; Patrick McKnight; Miles McFall; Alan Fontana; Robert Rosenheck
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2004
View more
  3 in total

1.  PREDICTORS OF RECIDIVISM OVER 3 YEARS AMONG SUBSTANCE-USING WOMEN RELEASED FROM JAIL.

Authors:  Christy K Scott; Christine E Grella; Michael L Dennis; Rodney R Funk
Journal:  Crim Justice Behav       Date:  2014-08-22

2.  The Impact of Juvenile Drug Treatment Courts on Substance Use, Mental Health, and Recidivism: Results from a Multisite Experimental Evaluation.

Authors:  Steven Belenko; Michael Dennis; Matthew Hiller; Juliette Mackin; Chelsey Cain; Doris Weiland; Barbara Estrada; Raanan Kagan
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Psychometric Properties of the Patient Activation Measure in Community-Dwelling Adults in Singapore.

Authors:  Lixia Ge; Palvinder Kaur; Chun Wei Yap; Bee Hoon Heng
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.099

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.