Literature DB >> 17499085

The reverse of social anxiety is not always the opposite: the reverse-scored items of the social interaction anxiety scale do not belong.

Thomas L Rodebaugh1, Carol M Woods, Richard G Heimberg.   

Abstract

Although well-used and empirically supported, the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) has a questionable factor structure and includes reverse-scored items with questionable utility. Here, using samples of undergraduates and a sample of clients with social anxiety disorder, we extend previous work that opened the question of whether the reverse-scored items belong on the scale. First, we successfully confirmed the factor structure obtained in previous samples. Second, we found the reverse-scored items to show consistently weaker relationships with a variety of comparison measures. Third, we demonstrated that removing the reverse-scored questions generally helps rather than hinders the psychometric performance of the SIAS total score. Fourth, we found that the reverse-scored items show a strong relationship with the normal personality characteristic of extraversion, suggesting that the reverse-scored items may primarily assess extraversion. Given the above results, we suggest investigators consider performing data analyses using only the straightforwardly worded items of the SIAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17499085     DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2006.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Ther        ISSN: 0005-7894


  58 in total

1.  Negative beliefs about the self prospectively predict eating disorder severity among undergraduate women.

Authors:  Brenna M Williams; Cheri A Levinson
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2020-04-13

2.  A comparison of self-report measures of psychopathy among nonforensic samples using item response theory analyses.

Authors:  Siny Tsang; Randall T Salekin; C Adam Coffey; Jennifer Cox
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2017-04-13

3.  Social anxiety and interpersonal stress generation: the moderating role of interpersonal distress.

Authors:  David M Siegel; Taylor A Burke; Jessica L Hamilton; Marilyn L Piccirillo; Adela Scharff; Lauren B Alloy
Journal:  Anxiety Stress Coping       Date:  2018-06-01

4.  The moderated effects of video feedback for social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Thomas L Rodebaugh; Richard G Heimberg; Luke T Schultz; Michelle Blackmore
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2010-04-22

5.  Perception matters for clinical perfectionism and social anxiety.

Authors:  Cheri A Levinson; Thomas L Rodebaugh; Erik A Shumaker; Andrew R Menatti; Justin W Weeks; Emily K White; Richard G Heimberg; Cortney S Warren; Carlos Blanco; Franklin Schneier; Michael R Liebowitz
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2014-11-24

6.  Attentional control mediates the effect of social anxiety on positive affect.

Authors:  Amanda S Morrison; Richard G Heimberg
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2012-11-05

7.  Social appearance anxiety, perfectionism, and fear of negative evaluation: distinct or shared risk factors for social anxiety and eating disorders?

Authors:  Cheri A Levinson; Thomas L Rodebaugh; Emily K White; Andrew R Menatti; Justin W Weeks; Juliette M Iacovino; Cortney S Warren
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Exploring the Relationship Between Social Anxiety and Bulimic Symptoms: Mediational Effects of Perfectionism Among Females.

Authors:  Andrew R Menatti; Justin W Weeks; Cheri A Levinson; Maggie M McGowan
Journal:  Cognit Ther Res       Date:  2013-10-01

9.  Perfectionism and social anxiety: rethinking the role of high standards.

Authors:  Erik A Shumaker; Thomas L Rodebaugh
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  2009-05-04

10.  Factor analytic and item response theory evaluation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in women with cancer.

Authors:  Salene M Wu; Tammy A Schuler; Michael C Edwards; Hae-Chung Yang; Brittany M Brothers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.