Literature DB >> 10204322

Investigating rating scale category utility.

J M Linacre1.   

Abstract

Eight guidelines are suggested to aid the analyst in investigating whether rating scales categories are cooperating to produce observations on which valid measurement can be based. These guidelines are presented within the context of Rasch analysis. They address features of rating-scale-based data such as category frequency, ordering, rating-to-measure inferential coherence, and the quality of the scale from measurement and statistical perspectives. The manner in which the guidelines prompt recategorization or reconceptualization of the rating scale is indicated. Utilization of the guidelines is illustrated through their application to two published data sets.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10204322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Outcome Meas        ISSN: 1090-655X


  73 in total

1.  Developing preference-based health measures: using Rasch analysis to generate health state values.

Authors:  Tracey A Young; Donna Rowen; Josephine Norquist; John E Brazier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Validation of the Full and Short-Form Self-Help Involvement Scale Against the Rasch Measurement Model.

Authors:  Karen M Conrad; Kendon J Conrad; Lora L Passetti; Rodney R Funk; Michael L Dennis
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2015-08-14

3.  Substance use disorder symptoms: evidence of differential item functioning by age.

Authors:  Kendon J Conrad; Michael L Dennis; Nikolaus Bezruczko; Rodney R Funk; Barth B Riley
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2007

4.  Impact of the Career Explorers program on high school students' perceptions of the pharmacy profession.

Authors:  Sarah M Langridge; Sheri L Stensland; Terri L Warholak; Lisa Mattingly
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Rasch analysis in the development of a simplified version of the National Eye Institute Visual-Function Questionnaire-25 for utility estimation.

Authors:  Jonathan W Kowalski; Anne M Rentz; John G Walt; Andrew Lloyd; Jeff Lee; Tracey A Young; Wen-Hung Chen; Neil M Bressler; Paul Lee; John E Brazier; Ron D Hays; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Influence of photodynamic therapy for age related macular degeneration upon subjective vision related quality of life.

Authors:  Alex W Hewitt; V Swetha Jeganathan; Juanita E Kidd; Konrad Pesudovs; Nitin Verma
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Using Rasch analysis to validate the revised PSQI to assess sleep disorders in Taiwan's hi-tech workers.

Authors:  Tsair-Wei Chien; Sen-Yen Hsu; Chein Tai; How-Ran Guo; Shih-Bin Su
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2008-04-25

8.  Using Rasch Analysis to Evaluate the Reliability and Validity of the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire: An Item Response Theory Approach.

Authors:  Reinie Cordier; Renée Speyer; Antonio Schindler; Emilia Michou; Bas Joris Heijnen; Laura Baijens; Ayşe Karaduman; Katina Swan; Pere Clavé; Annette Veronica Joosten
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Rasch analysis of the Student Refractive Error and Eyeglass Questionnaire.

Authors:  Mabel Crescioni; Dawn H Messer; Terri L Warholak; Joseph M Miller; J Daniel Twelker; Erin M Harvey
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Rasch Analysis of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in Workers with Traumatic Limb Injuries.

Authors:  Tzu-Yi Wu; Wan-Hui Yu; Chien-Yu Huang; Wen-Hsuan Hou; Ching-Lin Hsieh
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2016-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.