Literature DB >> 23636215

Appraisal of the LIFT and BIOLIFT procedure: initial experience and short-term outcomes of 33 consecutive patients.

Min-Hoe Chew1, Peter J M Lee, Cherry E Koh, Hwee E Chew.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A new sphincter-saving technique known as the LIFT (ligation of intersphincteric tract) procedure has gained growing interest. Use of a bioprosthetic device has also been suggested to augment the LIFT procedure (BIOLIFT). This study evaluates outcomes of patients undergoing LIFT and BIOLIFT for repair of complex anal fistulae.
METHODS: This study is a single-surgeon, single-centre retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. Study was conducted at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sydney, Australia, from May 2009 to April 2012. Thirty-three patients were evaluated. Twenty-nine LIFTs and five BIOLIFT procedures were evaluated. Primary success is defined as successful healing from initial procedure while secondary success is successful healing after management of failure or recurrence.
RESULTS: In a cohort of predominantly female (67 %) and 94 % transsphincteric fistulae, primary success was 63 %. At a median follow-up of 20 weeks (6-81 weeks), there were 11 failures and one recurrence. The median time to failure/recurrence was 3 weeks (1-25 weeks). Six patients had a subsequent fistulotomy and three patients had a BIOLIFT for non-successful outcomes. The median follow-up for those with failures/recurrences is 60 weeks (range 20-76 weeks) and secondary success was 88 %. Post-operative anal manometry studies showed a 9 % reduction of resting and 11 % reduction of squeeze pressures but this was not statistically significant. There was also no post-operative incontinence. Anterior fistulas were noted do significantly worse (47%) compared with non-anteriorly located fistulas (84 %; p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: LIFT and BIOLIFT procedures can be performed safely and effectively in a technically demanding study cohort of predominantly females with complex fistulas. Anterior fistulas have a higher risk of failure but present early and are amendable to repeat procedures. In particular, fistulotomies are useful in downstaged tracts and performing BIOLIFTs is an alternative in the management of LIFT failures and recurrences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23636215     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1702-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  22 in total

1.  A classification of fistula-in-ano.

Authors:  A G Parks; P H Gordon; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Faecal incontinence after seton treatment for anal fistulae with and without surgical division of internal anal sphincter: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Vial; D Parés; M Pera; L Grande
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Outcomes with the use of bioprosthetic grafts to reinforce the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (BioLIFT procedure) for the management of complex anal fistulas.

Authors:  C Neal Ellis
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  The anatomy of failures following the ligation of intersphincteric tract technique for anal fistula: a review of 93 patients over 4 years.

Authors:  Ker-Kan Tan; Ian J Tan; Frances S Lim; Dean C Koh; Charles B Tsang
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 6.  Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing drainage alone vs primary sphincter-cutting procedures for anorectal abscess-fistula.

Authors:  H M Quah; C L Tang; K W Eu; S Y E Chan; M Samuel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract: an effective new technique for complex fistulas.

Authors:  Joshua I S Bleier; Husein Moloo; Stanley M Goldberg
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano.

Authors:  A Shanwani; Azmi M Nor; Nil Amri
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Seton drainage prior to transanal advancement flap repair: useful or not?

Authors:  Litza E Mitalas; Jan J van Wijk; Martijn P Gosselink; Pascal Doornebosch; David D E Zimmerman; W Rudolph Schouten
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Continence disorders after anal surgery--a relevant problem?

Authors:  A Ommer; F A Wenger; T Rolfs; M K Walz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  3 in total

1.  Early experience with the modificated approach of ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract for high transsphincteric fistula.

Authors:  Feng Ye; Changling Tang; Danyang Wang; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Biomaterials in the treatment of anal fistula: hope or hype?

Authors:  Daniele Scoglio; Avery S Walker; Alessandro Fichera
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

3.  LIFT and BioLIFT: a 10-Year Single-Centre Experience of Treating Complex Fistula-In-Ano With Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract Procedure With or Without Bio-prosthetic Reinforcement (BioLIFT).

Authors:  Yee Chen Lau; Kilian G M Brown; Juyong Cheong; Christopher Byrne; Peter J Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.