Literature DB >> 23633490

Coevolution of solid stress and interstitial fluid pressure in tumors during progression: implications for vascular collapse.

Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos1, John D Martin, Matija Snuderl, Fotios Mpekris, Saloni R Jain, Rakesh K Jain.   

Abstract

The stress harbored by the solid phase of tumors is known as solid stress. Solid stress can be either applied externally by the surrounding normal tissue or induced by the tumor itself due to its growth. Fluid pressure is the isotropic stress exerted by the fluid phase. We recently showed that growth-induced solid stress is on the order of 1.3 to 13.0 kPa (10-100 mmHg)--high enough to cause compression of fragile blood vessels, resulting in poor perfusion and hypoxia. However, the evolution of growth-induced stress with tumor progression and its effect on cancer cell proliferation in vivo is not understood. To this end, we developed a mathematical model for tumor growth that takes into account all three types of stresses: growth-induced stress, externally applied stress, and fluid pressure. First, we conducted in vivo experiments and found that growth-induced stress is related to tumor volume through a biexponential relationship. Then, we incorporated this information into our mathematical model and showed that due to the evolution of growth-induced stress, total solid stress levels are higher in the tumor interior and lower in the periphery. Elevated compressive solid stress in the interior of the tumor is sufficient to cause the collapse of blood vessels and results in a lower growth rate of cancer cells compared with the periphery, independently from that caused by the lack of nutrients due to vessel collapse. Furthermore, solid stress in the periphery of the tumor causes blood vessels in the surrounding normal tissue to deform to elliptical shapes. We present histologic sections of human cancers that show such vessel deformations. Finally, we found that fluid pressure increases with tumor growth due to increased vascular permeability and lymphatic impairment, and is governed by the microvascular pressure. Crucially, fluid pressure does not cause vessel compression of tumor vessels. ©2013 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23633490      PMCID: PMC3702668          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  27 in total

1.  Interstitial stress and fluid pressure within a growing tumor.

Authors:  Malisa Sarntinoranont; Frank Rooney; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Vascular permeability and interstitial diffusion in superfused tissues: a two-dimensional model.

Authors:  L T Baxter; R K Jain
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.514

3.  Mechanisms of heterogeneous distribution of monoclonal antibodies and other macromolecules in tumors: significance of elevated interstitial pressure.

Authors:  R K Jain; L T Baxter
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Role of extracellular matrix assembly in interstitial transport in solid tumors.

Authors:  P A Netti; D A Berk; M A Swartz; A J Grodzinsky; R K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Pathology: cancer cells compress intratumour vessels.

Authors:  Timothy P Padera; Brian R Stoll; Jessica B Tooredman; Diane Capen; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Determinants of tumor blood flow: a review.

Authors:  R K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Solid stress generated by spheroid growth estimated using a linear poroelasticity model.

Authors:  Tiina Roose; Paolo A Netti; Lance L Munn; Yves Boucher; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.514

Review 8.  Normalizing tumor microenvironment to treat cancer: bench to bedside to biomarkers.

Authors:  Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors. I. Role of interstitial pressure and convection.

Authors:  L T Baxter; R K Jain
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.514

10.  Solid stress facilitates spheroid formation: potential involvement of hyaluronan.

Authors:  C Koike; T D McKee; A Pluen; S Ramanujan; K Burton; L L Munn; Y Boucher; R K Jain
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-03-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  130 in total

1.  Tumor Priming by SMO Inhibition Enhances Antibody Delivery and Efficacy in a Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Model.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Darren K W Chan; Arindam Sen; Wen Wee Ma; Robert M Straubinger
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 2.  Cancer metabolism gets physical.

Authors:  Peter DelNero; Benjamin D Hopkins; Lewis C Cantley; Claudia Fischbach
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Lymph node biophysical remodeling is associated with melanoma lymphatic drainage.

Authors:  Nathan Andrew Rohner; Jacob McClain; Sara Lydia Tuell; Alex Warner; Blair Smith; Youngho Yun; Abhinav Mohan; Manuela Sushnitha; Susan Napier Thomas
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Compression stiffening of brain and its effect on mechanosensing by glioma cells.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pogoda; LiKang Chin; Penelope C Georges; FitzRoy J Byfield; Robert Bucki; Richard Kim; Michael Weaver; Rebecca G Wells; Cezary Marcinkiewicz; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  New J Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.729

5.  Anti-VEGF therapy induces ECM remodeling and mechanical barriers to therapy in colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  Nuh N Rahbari; Dmitriy Kedrin; Joao Incio; Hao Liu; William W Ho; Hadi T Nia; Christina M Edrich; Keehoon Jung; Julien Daubriac; Ivy Chen; Takahiro Heishi; John D Martin; Yuhui Huang; Nir Maimon; Christoph Reissfelder; Jurgen Weitz; Yves Boucher; Jeffrey W Clark; Alan J Grodzinsky; Dan G Duda; Rakesh K Jain; Dai Fukumura
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  Mechanical confinement via a PEG/Collagen interpenetrating network inhibits behavior characteristic of malignant cells in the triple negative breast cancer cell line MDA.MB.231.

Authors:  Daniel S Reynolds; Kristen M Bougher; Justin H Letendre; Stephen F Fitzgerald; Undina O Gisladottir; Mark W Grinstaff; Muhammad H Zaman
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Mechanotransduction of fluid stresses governs 3D cell migration.

Authors:  William J Polacheck; Alexandra E German; Akiko Mammoto; Donald E Ingber; Roger D Kamm
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Reengineering the Tumor Microenvironment to Alleviate Hypoxia and Overcome Cancer Heterogeneity.

Authors:  John D Martin; Dai Fukumura; Dan G Duda; Yves Boucher; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.915

9.  Experimental and computational analyses reveal dynamics of tumor vessel cooption and optimal treatment strategies.

Authors:  Chrysovalantis Voutouri; Nathaniel D Kirkpatrick; Euiheon Chung; Fotios Mpekris; James W Baish; Lance L Munn; Dai Fukumura; Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Biomechanical modelling of spinal tumour anisotropic growth.

Authors:  Ioanna Katsamba; Pavlos Evangelidis; Chrysovalantis Voutouri; Alkiviadis Tsamis; Vasileios Vavourakis; Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.704

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.