BACKGROUND: Development of trauma systems is a demanding process. The United States and Germany both have sophisticated trauma systems. This manuscript is a summary of political, economic, and medical changes that have led to the development of both trauma systems and the current high-quality standards. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We specifically asked three questions: (1) What tasks are involved in developing a modern trauma system? (2) What is the approach to achieve this task? (3) Do these systems work? METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of relevant articles by searching electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library) using the following search terms: "trauma system", "polytrauma", "trauma networks", and "trauma registry". Of 2573 retrieved manuscripts, the authors made a personal selection of studies. A personal study selection from our experiences was added when their contribution to the topic was judged important. RESULTS: Worldwide, similar tasks concerning trauma care have to be addressed. In most societies, traffic accidents and firearm-related injuries contribute to a high number of trauma victims. The German approach has been to decrease the number of accidents through injury prevention and to provide better care by establishing an emergency medical system. For in-hospital treatment, clinical care has constantly improved and a close interaction with members from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association has helped a great deal to achieve these improvements. The German healthcare system was developed as a powerful healthcare tool covering patients from injury to rehabilitation. In addition, trauma and injury research has been strengthened to deal with various questions of trauma care. CONCLUSIONS: Organized injury prevention programs and systematized professional patient care can address the issues associated with the global burden of trauma. These trauma systems require constant monitoring and improvement.
BACKGROUND: Development of trauma systems is a demanding process. The United States and Germany both have sophisticated trauma systems. This manuscript is a summary of political, economic, and medical changes that have led to the development of both trauma systems and the current high-quality standards. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We specifically asked three questions: (1) What tasks are involved in developing a modern trauma system? (2) What is the approach to achieve this task? (3) Do these systems work? METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of relevant articles by searching electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library) using the following search terms: "trauma system", "polytrauma", "trauma networks", and "trauma registry". Of 2573 retrieved manuscripts, the authors made a personal selection of studies. A personal study selection from our experiences was added when their contribution to the topic was judged important. RESULTS: Worldwide, similar tasks concerning trauma care have to be addressed. In most societies, traffic accidents and firearm-related injuries contribute to a high number of trauma victims. The German approach has been to decrease the number of accidents through injury prevention and to provide better care by establishing an emergency medical system. For in-hospital treatment, clinical care has constantly improved and a close interaction with members from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association has helped a great deal to achieve these improvements. The German healthcare system was developed as a powerful healthcare tool covering patients from injury to rehabilitation. In addition, trauma and injury research has been strengthened to deal with various questions of trauma care. CONCLUSIONS: Organized injury prevention programs and systematized professional patient care can address the issues associated with the global burden of trauma. These trauma systems require constant monitoring and improvement.
Authors: George C Patton; Carolyn Coffey; Susan M Sawyer; Russell M Viner; Dagmar M Haller; Krishna Bose; Theo Vos; Jane Ferguson; Colin D Mathers Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-09-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Antoinette Edwards; Stefano Di Bartolomeo; Arturo Chieregato; Tim Coats; Francesco Della Corte; Peter Giannoudis; Ernestina Gomes; Henrik Groenborg; Rolf Lefering; Ari Leppaniemi; Hans Morten Lossius; Per Ortenwal; Olav Roise; Martin Rusnak; Leontien Sturms; Martin Smith; Annemarie Bondegaard Thomsen; Keith Willett; Maralyn Woodford; David Yates; Fiona Lecky Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2007-08-21 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Falco Hietbrink; Shahin Mohseni; Diego Mariani; Päl Aksel Naess; Cristina Rey-Valcárcel; Alan Biloslavo; Gary A Bass; Susan I Brundage; Henrique Alexandrino; Ruben Peralta; Luke P H Leenen; Tina Gaarder Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 2.374
Authors: Michael Koller; Antonio Ernstberger; Florian Zeman; Julika Loss; Michael Nerlich Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Falco Hietbrink; Roderick M Houwert; Karlijn J P van Wessem; Rogier K J Simmermacher; Geertje A M Govaert; Mirjam B de Jong; Ivar G J de Bruin; Johan de Graaf; Loek P H Leenen Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2019-11-23 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Hagen Andruszkow; Uwe Schweigkofler; Rolf Lefering; Magnus Frey; Klemens Horst; Roman Pfeifer; Stefan Kurt Beckers; Hans-Christoph Pape; Frank Hildebrand Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 3.240