Literature DB >> 17714850

A comparison of European Trauma Registries. The first report from the EuroTARN Group.

Antoinette Edwards1, Stefano Di Bartolomeo, Arturo Chieregato, Tim Coats, Francesco Della Corte, Peter Giannoudis, Ernestina Gomes, Henrik Groenborg, Rolf Lefering, Ari Leppaniemi, Hans Morten Lossius, Per Ortenwal, Olav Roise, Martin Rusnak, Leontien Sturms, Martin Smith, Annemarie Bondegaard Thomsen, Keith Willett, Maralyn Woodford, David Yates, Fiona Lecky.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Trauma management systems have grown in response to regional variations in trauma population, geographical conditions and the provisions of care. National Trauma Registries are being established to improve patient outcomes. However international comparisons could provide the potential to record regional performance, identify and share examples of best practice. To assess whether it was possible to compare data currently being collected by a number of trauma services across Europe, a group was established to develop a common core dataset and to assess the feasibility of collecting anonymised data.
METHOD: A series of meetings with European collaborators led to the creation of a group entitled EuroTARN. A website was developed in 2002 and interested parties were invited to submit suggestions for a European dataset using an online version of the Delphi technique. A core dataset was created in 2003 and in 2004 participants were invited to submit a summary of past cases online via the EuroTARN Website.
RESULTS: Representatives from 14 countries met and corresponded to create the core dataset. During a trial data collection phase 14 institutions from 11 countries submitted unadjusted mortality data for over 21,500 cases with injury severity Scores of over 15 including information on multiply injured and head injured patients. The results demonstrated that there were observed differences in trauma outcome for similar groups of patients.
CONCLUSION: It is possible to collect and collate outcome data from established trauma registries across Europe with minimal additional infrastructure using a web-based system. Initial analysis of the results reveals significant international variations. The network has potential as a source of data for epidemiological and clinical research and for optimal trauma system design across Europe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17714850     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  19 in total

1.  Trauma networks: present and future challenges.

Authors:  Nikolaos K Kanakaris; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  Acute ischemia of the lower limb after injury by gunshot: case report and review of literature.

Authors:  J F C de Vasconcelos; V Martins; D Brandão; M Maia; J Ferreira; S Braga; L Rios; H Costa; A G Vaz
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Trauma registry comparison: six-year results in trauma care in Southern Finland and Germany.

Authors:  T Brinck; L Handolin; T Paffrath; R Lefering
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Benchmarking of trauma care worldwide: the potential value of an International Trauma Data Bank (ITDB).

Authors:  Adil H Haider; Zain G Hashmi; Sonia Gupta; Syed Nabeel Zafar; Jean-Stephane David; David T Efron; Kent A Stevens; Hasnain Zafar; Eric B Schneider; Eric Voiglio; Raul Coimbra; Elliott R Haut
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  A comparison of the treatment of severe injuries between the former East and West German States.

Authors:  Carsten Mand; Thorben Müller; Rolf Lefering; Steffen Ruchholtz; Christian A Kühne
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Changes in the outcomes of severe trauma patients from 15-year experience in a Western European trauma ICU of Emilia Romagna region (1996-2010). A population cross-sectional survey study.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Giorgio Gambale; Federico Coccolini; Fausto Catena; Eleonora Giorgini; Luca Ansaloni; Niki Amadori; Carlo Coniglio; Aimone Giugni; Andrea Biscardi; Stefano Magnone; Filippo Filicori; Piergiorgio Cavallo; Silvia Villani; Francesco Cinquantini; Massimo Annicchiarico; Giovanni Gordini; Gregorio Tugnoli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  In search of benchmarking for mortality following multiple trauma: a Swiss trauma center experience.

Authors:  Ida Füglistaler-Montali; Corinna Attenberger; Philipp Füglistaler; Augustinus L Jacob; Felix Amsler; Thomas Gross
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Polytrauma in the elderly: specific considerations and current concepts of management.

Authors:  R Dimitriou; G M Calori; P V Giannoudis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Trauma care in Germany: an inclusive system.

Authors:  Johannes A Sturm; Hans-Christoph Pape; Thomas Dienstknecht
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Advanced accident research system based on a medical and engineering data in the metropolitan area of Florence.

Authors:  Simone Piantini; David Grassi; Marco Mangini; Marco Pierini; Giovanni Zagli; Rosario Spina; Adriano Peris
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2013-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.