PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to validate an adaptive, contrast-oriented thresholding algorithm (COA) for tumour delineation in (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in comparison with pathological findings. The impact of tumour localization, tumour size and uptake heterogeneity on PET delineation results was also investigated. METHODS: PET tumour delineation by COA was compared with both CT delineation and pathological findings in 15 patients to investigate its validity. Correlations between anatomical volume, metabolic volume and the pathology reference as well as between the corresponding maximal diameters were determined. Differences between PET delineations and pathological results were investigated with respect to tumour localization and uptake heterogeneity. RESULTS: The delineated volumes and maximal diameters measured on PET and CT images significantly correlated with the pathology reference (both r > 0.95, p < 0.0001). Both PET and CT contours resulted in overestimation of the pathological volume (PET 32.5 ± 26.5%, CT 46.6 ± 27.4%). CT volumes were larger than those delineated on PET images (CT 60.6 ± 86.3 ml, PET 48.3 ± 61.7 ml). Maximal tumour diameters were similar for PET and CT (51.4 ± 19.8 mm for CT versus 53.4 ± 19.1 mm for PET), slightly overestimating the pathological reference (mean difference CT 4.3 ± 3.2 mm, PET 6.2 ± 5.1 mm). PET volumes of lung tumours located in the lower lobe were significantly different from those determined from pathology (p = 0.037), whereas no significant differences were observed for tumours located in the upper lobe (p = 0.066). Only minor correlation was found between pathological tumour size and PET heterogeneity (r = -0.24). CONCLUSION: PET tumour delineation by COA showed a good correlation with pathological findings. Tumour localization had an influence on PET delineation results. The impact of tracer uptake heterogeneity on PET delineation should be considered carefully and individually in each patient. Altogether, PET tumour delineation by COA for NSCLC patients is feasible and reliable with the potential for routine clinical application.
PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to validate an adaptive, contrast-oriented thresholding algorithm (COA) for tumour delineation in (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in comparison with pathological findings. The impact of tumour localization, tumour size and uptake heterogeneity on PET delineation results was also investigated. METHODS: PET tumour delineation by COA was compared with both CT delineation and pathological findings in 15 patients to investigate its validity. Correlations between anatomical volume, metabolic volume and the pathology reference as well as between the corresponding maximal diameters were determined. Differences between PET delineations and pathological results were investigated with respect to tumour localization and uptake heterogeneity. RESULTS: The delineated volumes and maximal diameters measured on PET and CT images significantly correlated with the pathology reference (both r > 0.95, p < 0.0001). Both PET and CT contours resulted in overestimation of the pathological volume (PET 32.5 ± 26.5%, CT 46.6 ± 27.4%). CT volumes were larger than those delineated on PET images (CT 60.6 ± 86.3 ml, PET 48.3 ± 61.7 ml). Maximal tumour diameters were similar for PET and CT (51.4 ± 19.8 mm for CT versus 53.4 ± 19.1 mm for PET), slightly overestimating the pathological reference (mean difference CT 4.3 ± 3.2 mm, PET 6.2 ± 5.1 mm). PET volumes of lung tumours located in the lower lobe were significantly different from those determined from pathology (p = 0.037), whereas no significant differences were observed for tumours located in the upper lobe (p = 0.066). Only minor correlation was found between pathological tumour size and PET heterogeneity (r = -0.24). CONCLUSION: PET tumour delineation by COA showed a good correlation with pathological findings. Tumour localization had an influence on PET delineation results. The impact of tracer uptake heterogeneity on PET delineation should be considered carefully and individually in each patient. Altogether, PET tumour delineation by COA for NSCLCpatients is feasible and reliable with the potential for routine clinical application.
Authors: D Thorwarth; T Beyer; R Boellaard; D de Ruysscher; A Grgic; J A Lee; U Pietrzyk; B Sattler; A Schaefer; W van Elmpt; W Vogel; W J G Oyen; U Nestle Journal: Nuklearmedizin Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 1.379
Authors: A Schaefer; U Nestle; S Kremp; D Hellwig; A Grgic; H G Buchholz; W Mischke; C Gromoll; P Dennert; M Plotkin; S Senftleben; D Thorwarth; M Tosch; A Wahl; H Wengenmair; C Rübe; C-M Kirsch Journal: Nuklearmedizin Date: 2012-03-26 Impact factor: 1.379
Authors: Marisa Bazañez-Borgert; Ralph A Bundschuh; Michael Herz; Maria-Jose Martínez; Markus Schwaiger; Sibylle I Ziegler Journal: Z Med Phys Date: 2008 Impact factor: 4.820
Authors: Kailiang Wu; Yee C Ung; Jennifer Hornby; Marc Freeman; David Hwang; Ming S Tsao; Max Dahele; Gail Darling; Donna E Maziak; Romeo Tirona; Kathy Mah; C Shun Wong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-10-14 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Babak Saboury; Ali Salavati; Alex Brothers; Sandip Basu; Thomas C Kwee; Marnix G E H Lam; Roland Hustinx; Edouard Louis; Drew A Torigian; Abass Alavi Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ali Salavati; Fenghai Duan; Bradley S Snyder; Bo Wei; Sina Houshmand; Benjapa Khiewvan; Adam Opanowski; Charles B Simone; Barry A Siegel; Mitchell Machtay; Abass Alavi Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-07-08 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: A Schaefer; M Vermandel; C Baillet; A S Dewalle-Vignion; R Modzelewski; P Vera; L Massoptier; C Parcq; D Gibon; T Fechter; U Nemer; I Gardin; U Nestle Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-11-14 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Chintan Parmar; Mohammed Jermoumi; Raymond H Mak; Angela van Baardwijk; Fiona M Fennessy; John H Lewis; Dirk De Ruysscher; Ron Kikinis; Philippe Lambin; Hugo J W L Aerts Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 4.379