Luna Xu1, Anna M Blonska, Nicole M Pumariega, Srilaxmi Bearelly, Mahsa A Sohrab, Gregory S Hageman, R Theodore Smith. 1. *Department of Ophthalmology, E.S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York; †Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; and ‡Department of Ophthalmology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence of reticular macular disease (RMD), a subphenotype of age-related macular degeneration, in multilobular geographic atrophy (GA) and its relation to GA progression. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven eyes of 99 subjects with age-related macular degeneration, primary GA, and good quality autofluorescence, and/or infrared images were classified into unilobular GA (1 lesion) or multilobular GA (≥ 2 distinct and/or coalescent lesions). Thirty-four subjects (50 eyes) had serial imaging. The authors determined the spatiotemporal relationships of RMD to GA and GA progression rates in five macular fields. RESULTS: 91.7% eyes (144 of 157) had multilobular GA, 95.8% of which exhibited RMD. In subjects with serial imaging, the mean GA growth rate significantly differed between the unilobular and multilobular groups (0.40 vs. 1.30 mm2/year, P < 0.001). Of the macular fields in these eyes, 77.1% of fields with RMD at baseline showed subsequent GA progression, while 53.4% of fields without RMD showed progression (P < 0.001). Percentage of fields with RMD significantly correlated with GA progression rate (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Autofluorescence and infrared imaging demonstrates that RMD is nearly always present with multilobular GA in age-related macular degeneration. Furthermore, GA lobules frequently develop in areas of RMD, suggesting progression of a single underlying disease process.
PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence of reticular macular disease (RMD), a subphenotype of age-related macular degeneration, in multilobular geographic atrophy (GA) and its relation to GA progression. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven eyes of 99 subjects with age-related macular degeneration, primary GA, and good quality autofluorescence, and/or infrared images were classified into unilobular GA (1 lesion) or multilobular GA (≥ 2 distinct and/or coalescent lesions). Thirty-four subjects (50 eyes) had serial imaging. The authors determined the spatiotemporal relationships of RMD to GA and GA progression rates in five macular fields. RESULTS: 91.7% eyes (144 of 157) had multilobular GA, 95.8% of which exhibited RMD. In subjects with serial imaging, the mean GA growth rate significantly differed between the unilobular and multilobular groups (0.40 vs. 1.30 mm2/year, P < 0.001). Of the macular fields in these eyes, 77.1% of fields with RMD at baseline showed subsequent GA progression, while 53.4% of fields without RMD showed progression (P < 0.001). Percentage of fields with RMD significantly correlated with GA progression rate (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Autofluorescence and infrared imaging demonstrates that RMD is nearly always present with multilobular GA in age-related macular degeneration. Furthermore, GA lobules frequently develop in areas of RMD, suggesting progression of a single underlying disease process.
Authors: Mahsa A Sohrab; R Theodore Smith; Hani Salehi-Had; SriniVas R Sadda; Amani A Fawzi Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-07-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Noemi Lois; Sarah L Owens; Rosa Coco; Jill Hopkins; Frederick W Fitzke; Alan C Bird Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: R Theodore Smith; Jackie K Chan; Mihai Busuoic; Vasuki Sivagnanavel; Alan C Bird; N Victor Chong Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Anne S Lindblad; Patricia C Lloyd; Traci E Clemons; Gary R Gensler; Frederick L Ferris; Michael L Klein; Jane R Armstrong Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2009-09
Authors: David Neely; Anna V Zarubina; Mark E Clark; Carrie E Huisingh; Gregory R Jackson; Yuhua Zhang; Gerald McGwin; Christine A Curcio; Cynthia Owsley Journal: Retina Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Patrick A Kaszubski; Tal Ben Ami; Céline Saade; Camellia Nabati; Vivek Kumar; Ana Rita Santos; Rufino Silva; Maria Luz Cachulo; José G Cunha-Vaz; R Theodore Smith Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Yuhua Zhang; Xiaolin Wang; Pooja Godara; Tianjiao Zhang; Mark E Clark; C Douglas Witherspoon; Richard F Spaide; Cynthia Owsley; Christine A Curcio Journal: Retina Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Emma C Zanzottera; Jeffrey D Messinger; Thomas Ach; R Theodore Smith; K Bailey Freund; Christine A Curcio Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Rachel M Cymerman; Adam H Skolnick; William J Cole; Camellia Nabati; Christine A Curcio; R Theodore Smith Journal: Curr Eye Res Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 2.424
Authors: Yue Yu; Eric M Moult; Siyu Chen; Qiushi Ren; Philip J Rosenfeld; Nadia K Waheed; James G Fujimoto Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 3.732