PURPOSE: To present a method developed for measuring areas of geographic atrophy (GA) in advanced age-related macular degeneration, METHODS: A microfilm reader projected the 30 degrees fundus photograph of the macula. Retinal landmarks, atrophic areas, and spared areas within the atrophy were traced, without access to drawings of other years. The total atrophic area was calculated, as was the atrophy within a four-disc-area circle entered on the estimated foveal center. The configuration of the atrophy was documented. RESULTS: Avoidable sources of discrepancy included variability in peripapillary atrophy seen on the photograph, and variability seen in the extent of the field. Reproducibility studies found a median absolute difference of 0.19 Macular Photocoagulation Study disc areas (DA) in total atrophy between repeat drawings, with 75% of repeat drawings having a difference of less than 0.33 DA. For central atrophy measures, there was a median difference of 0.08 DA, with 75% of pairs having a difference of less than 0.18 DA. Features making the definition of borders of GA difficult include the presence of drusen and pigmentary alteration, a fundus in which choroidal vessels are easily visible, and variation in the appearance of GA within a single area of atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: This method provides a reliable means of measuring the size of atrophic areas in GA and will be useful for measuring longitudinal change. It may be difficult to determine whether central spared areas are present, and correlation with visual acuity and macular perimetry may be helpful.
PURPOSE: To present a method developed for measuring areas of geographic atrophy (GA) in advanced age-related macular degeneration, METHODS: A microfilm reader projected the 30 degrees fundus photograph of the macula. Retinal landmarks, atrophic areas, and spared areas within the atrophy were traced, without access to drawings of other years. The total atrophic area was calculated, as was the atrophy within a four-disc-area circle entered on the estimated foveal center. The configuration of the atrophy was documented. RESULTS: Avoidable sources of discrepancy included variability in peripapillary atrophy seen on the photograph, and variability seen in the extent of the field. Reproducibility studies found a median absolute difference of 0.19 Macular Photocoagulation Study disc areas (DA) in total atrophy between repeat drawings, with 75% of repeat drawings having a difference of less than 0.33 DA. For central atrophy measures, there was a median difference of 0.08 DA, with 75% of pairs having a difference of less than 0.18 DA. Features making the definition of borders of GA difficult include the presence of drusen and pigmentary alteration, a fundus in which choroidal vessels are easily visible, and variation in the appearance of GA within a single area of atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: This method provides a reliable means of measuring the size of atrophic areas in GA and will be useful for measuring longitudinal change. It may be difficult to determine whether central spared areas are present, and correlation with visual acuity and macular perimetry may be helpful.
Authors: Annal D Meleth; Pradeep Mettu; Elvira Agrón; Emily Y Chew; Srinivas R Sadda; Frederick L Ferris; Wai T Wong Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-02-28 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Albert K Feeny; Mongkol Tadarati; David E Freund; Neil M Bressler; Philippe Burlina Journal: Comput Biol Med Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 4.589
Authors: Zohar Yehoshua; Philip J Rosenfeld; Giovanni Gregori; William J Feuer; Manuel Falcão; Brandon J Lujan; Carmen Puliafito Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: R Theodore Smith; Jan P Koniarek; Jackie Chan; Takayuki Nagasaki; Janet R Sparrow; Kevin Langton Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Janet S Sunness; Eyal Margalit; Divya Srikumaran; Carol A Applegate; Yan Tian; Daniel Perry; Barbara S Hawkins; Neil M Bressler Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 12.079