Literature DB >> 23632815

Natural history of colorectal adenomas: birth cohort analysis among 3.6 million participants of screening colonoscopy.

Hermann Brenner1, Lutz Altenhofen, Christian Stock, Michael Hoffmeister.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most colorectal cancers (CRC) develop from adenomas. Knowledge of the natural history of colorectal adenomas, which is not directly observable for ethical reasons, is crucial for designing cost-effective CRC screening strategies.
METHODS: We derived transition rates from carriage of nonadvanced adenoma to carriage of advanced adenoma to carriage of CRC by sex and age in birth cohort analyses among 3,593,420 participants in the German screening colonoscopy program in 2003-2010.
RESULTS: Transition rates from advanced adenoma to CRC carriage were similar in men and women, but monotonically and significantly increased with age. Estimated annual transition percentages [(95% confidence interval (CI)] in age groups 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, 70-74, and 75-79 years were 2.6 (2.4-2.9), 3.1 (2.8-3.3), 3.8 (3.5-4.1), 5.1 (4.8-5.5), and 5.2 (4.6-5.8) among men, and 2.5 (2.2-2.7), 2.7 (2.4-3.0), 3.8 (3.5-4.1), 5.0 (4.5-5.4), and 5.6 (4.9-6.3) among women. Estimated annual transitions from carriage of nonadvanced to carriage of advanced adenoma were in a narrow range from 3.6% to 4.7% for all age and sex groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite low annual transition rates, cumulative transition rates from advanced adenoma to CRC carriage are expected to exceed by 60%, 50%, and 40% for age intervals 55-80, 65-80, and 70-80 years, respectively, in both sexes. Cumulative transition rates from nonadvanced adenoma to CRC carriage are expected to be close to 30% for age interval 55-80 years, but less than 2% for age interval 75-80 years. IMPACT: Our results enhance the empirical basis for modeling CRC screening strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23632815     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  23 in total

1.  Multiobjective Calibration of Disease Simulation Models Using Gaussian Processes.

Authors:  Aditya Sai; Carolina Vivas-Valencia; Thomas F Imperiale; Nan Kong
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Derivation and Validation of a Scoring System to Stratify Risk for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Adults: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; Patrick O Monahan; Timothy E Stump; Elizabeth A Glowinski; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; William M Grady; David Lieberman; Thomas Seufferlein; Joseph J Sung; Petra G Boelens; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 52.329

Review 4.  Declining Bowel Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Germany.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Petra Schrotz-King; Bernd Holleczek; Alexander Katalinic; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  Interval Colorectal Cancer After Colonoscopy: Exploring Explanations and Solutions.

Authors:  Jeffrey Adler; Douglas J Robertson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 6.  Fecal immunochemical tests in combination with blood tests for colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma detection-systematic review.

Authors:  Tobias Niedermaier; Korbinian Weigl; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  The Costs and Benefits of Risk Stratification for Colorectal Cancer Screening Based On Phenotypic and Genetic Risk: A Health Economic Analysis.

Authors:  Chloe Thomas; Olena Mandrik; Catherine L Saunders; Deborah Thompson; Sophie Whyte; Simon Griffin; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2021-05-26

8.  Very-low-dose aspirin and surveillance colonoscopy is cost-effective in secondary prevention of colorectal cancer in individuals with advanced adenomas: network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Sajesh K Veettil; Siang Tong Kew; Kean Ghee Lim; Pochamana Phisalprapa; Suresh Kumar; Yeong Yeh Lee; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 9.  Colorectal cancer screening: the time to act is now.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Christian Stock; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT: maximum standard uptake value as a trigger in a semi-automated screening setting.

Authors:  Wolfgang Luboldt; Baerbel Wiedemann; Sebastian Fischer; Boris Bodelle; Hans Joachim Luboldt; Frank Grünwald; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 2.175

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.