| Literature DB >> 23632666 |
T Kurien1, R G Pearson, B E Scammell.
Abstract
We reviewed 59 bone graft substitutes marketed by 17 companies currently available for implantation in the United Kingdom, with the aim of assessing the peer-reviewed literature to facilitate informed decision-making regarding their use in clinical practice. After critical analysis of the literature, only 22 products (37%) had any clinical data. Norian SRS (Synthes), Vitoss (Orthovita), Cortoss (Orthovita) and Alpha-BSM (Etex) had Level I evidence. We question the need for so many different products, especially with limited published clinical evidence for their efficacy, and conclude that there is a considerable need for further prospective randomised trials to facilitate informed decision-making with regard to the use of current and future bone graft substitutes in clinical practice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23632666 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B5.30286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone Joint J ISSN: 2049-4394 Impact factor: 5.082