Literature DB >> 23632666

Bone graft substitutes currently available in orthopaedic practice: the evidence for their use.

T Kurien1, R G Pearson, B E Scammell.   

Abstract

We reviewed 59 bone graft substitutes marketed by 17 companies currently available for implantation in the United Kingdom, with the aim of assessing the peer-reviewed literature to facilitate informed decision-making regarding their use in clinical practice. After critical analysis of the literature, only 22 products (37%) had any clinical data. Norian SRS (Synthes), Vitoss (Orthovita), Cortoss (Orthovita) and Alpha-BSM (Etex) had Level I evidence. We question the need for so many different products, especially with limited published clinical evidence for their efficacy, and conclude that there is a considerable need for further prospective randomised trials to facilitate informed decision-making with regard to the use of current and future bone graft substitutes in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23632666     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B5.30286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  53 in total

1.  Enhancement of the Regenerative Potential of Anorganic Bovine Bone Graft Utilizing a Polyglutamate-Modified BMP2 Peptide with Improved Binding to Calcium-Containing Materials.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bain; Paul P Bonvallet; Ramzi V Abou-Arraj; Peter Schupbach; Michael S Reddy; Susan L Bellis
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Arthroscopic Contribution of Synthetic Graft in Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthroscopic Fusions.

Authors:  Jaime A Sánchez Lázaro; Óscar Fernández Hernández; Francisco Madera González
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-12-28

3.  Clinical outcomes of treatment with cage-shaped demineralized bone plus local bone grafts vs. autogenous iliac crest bone grafts in instrumented single-level lumbar fusion: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chen-Guang Zhao; Jie Qin; Xin Wang; Gang Xu; Yong Jia; Yu-Cheng Guan; Xiang Mou; Hua Yuan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  3D Printing of Personalized Artificial Bone Scaffolds.

Authors:  Shailly H Jariwala; Gregory S Lewis; Zachary J Bushman; James H Adair; Henry J Donahue
Journal:  3D Print Addit Manuf       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.449

5.  Innovating in the medical device industry - challenges & opportunities ESB 2015 translational research symposium.

Authors:  Y Bayon; M Bohner; D Eglin; P Procter; R G Richards; J Weber; D I Zeugolis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Calcaneal Ossoscopy.

Authors:  Andreas Toepfer; Ulrich Lenze; Norbert Harrasser
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-06-20

Review 7.  [Bone substitute materials as local drug carriers : Current status of substitutes of various origins].

Authors:  K-D Kühn; C Berberich; H Bösebeck
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Gareth Turnbull; Jon Clarke; Frédéric Picard; Philip Riches; Luanluan Jia; Fengxuan Han; Bin Li; Wenmiao Shu
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-12-01

9.  3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Jason A Inzana; Diana Olvera; Seth M Fuller; James P Kelly; Olivia A Graeve; Edward M Schwarz; Stephen L Kates; Hani A Awad
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Progressing innovation in biomaterials. From the bench to the bed of patients.

Authors:  Y Bayon; M Bohner; D Eglin; M Thérin; A Montali; P Procter; J Fisher; R G Richards
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.